Six-Month Pulmonary Impairment after Severe COVID-19: A Prospective, Multicentre Follow-Up Study

Paola Faverio, Fabrizio Luppi, Paola Rebora, Sara Busnelli, Anna Stainer, Martina Catalano, Luca Parachini, Anna Monzani, Stefania Galimberti, Francesco Bini, Bruno Dino Bodini, Monia Betti, Federica De Giacomi, Paolo Scarpazza, Elisa Oggionni, Alessandro Scartabellati, Luca Bilucaglia, Paolo Ceruti, Denise Modina, Sergio Harari, Antonella Caminati, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Giacomo Bellani, Giuseppe Foti, Alberto Pesci, Paola Faverio, Fabrizio Luppi, Paola Rebora, Sara Busnelli, Anna Stainer, Martina Catalano, Luca Parachini, Anna Monzani, Stefania Galimberti, Francesco Bini, Bruno Dino Bodini, Monia Betti, Federica De Giacomi, Paolo Scarpazza, Elisa Oggionni, Alessandro Scartabellati, Luca Bilucaglia, Paolo Ceruti, Denise Modina, Sergio Harari, Antonella Caminati, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Giacomo Bellani, Giuseppe Foti, Alberto Pesci

Abstract

Background: Long-term pulmonary sequelae following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia are not yet confirmed; however, preliminary observations suggest a possible relevant clinical, functional, and radiological impairment.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify and characterize pulmonary sequelae caused by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia at 6-month follow-up.

Methods: In this multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study, patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and without prior diagnosis of structural lung diseases were stratified by maximum ventilatory support ("oxygen only," "continuous positive airway pressure," and "invasive mechanical ventilation") and followed up at 6 months from discharge. Pulmonary function tests and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), 6-min walking test, chest X-ray, physical examination, and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea score were collected.

Results: Between March and June 2020, 312 patients were enrolled (83, 27% women; median interquartile range age 61.1 [53.4, 69.3] years). The parameters that showed the highest rate of impairment were DLCO and chest X-ray, in 46% and 25% of patients, respectively. However, only a minority of patients reported dyspnoea (31%), defined as mMRC ≥1, or showed restrictive ventilatory defects (9%). In the logistic regression model, having asthma as a comorbidity was associated with DLCO impairment at follow-up, while prophylactic heparin administration during hospitalization appeared as a protective factor. The need for invasive ventilatory support during hospitalization was associated with chest imaging abnormalities.

Conclusions: DLCO and radiological assessment appear to be the most sensitive tools to monitor patients with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during follow-up. Future studies with longer follow-up are warranted to better understand pulmonary sequelae.

Keywords: COVID-19; Follow-up; Pneumonia; Pulmonary fibrosis; Radiology and other imaging; Respiratory function tests.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart. CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory patterns according to study group. Restrictive ventilatory impairment was defined as a reduction in TLC with a normal FEV1/VC. CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; TLC, total lung capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; VC, vital capacity.

References

    1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical Characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–20.
    1. Tian S, Hu W, Niu L, Liu H, Xu H, Xiao SY. Pulmonary pathology of early-phase 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia in two patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15((5)):700–4.
    1. Mineo G, Ciccarese F, Modolon C, Landini MP, Valentino M, Zompatori M. Post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis in patients with H1N1 pneumonia: role of followup CT. Radiol Med. 2012;117((2)):185–200.
    1. Zhang P, Li J, Liu H, Han N, Ju J, Kou Y, et al. Long-term bone and lung consequences associated with hospital-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome: a 15-year follow-up from a prospective cohort study. Bone Res. 2020;8:8.
    1. Zhang R, Pan Y, Fanelli V, Wu S, Luo AA, Islam D, et al. Mechanical stress and the induction of lung fibrosis via the midkine signaling pathway. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192((3)):315–23.
    1. Cabrera-Benitez NE, Laffey JG, Parotto M, Spieth PM, Villar J, Zhang H, et al. Mechanical ventilation–associated lung fibrosis in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a significant contributor to poor outcome. Anesthesiology. 2014;121((1)):189–98.
    1. Zhao YM, Shang YM, Song WB, Li QQ, Xie H, Xu QF, et al. Follow-up study of the pulmonary function and related physiological characteristics of COVID-19 survivors three months after recovery. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;25:100463.
    1. van Gassel RJJ, Bels JLM, Raafs A, van Bussel BCT, van de Poll MCG, Simons SO, et al. High prevalence of pulmonary sequelae at 3 months after hospital discharge in mechanically ventilated survivors of COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203((3)):371–4.
    1. van den Borst B, Peters JB, Brink M, Schoon Y, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Schers H, et al. Comprehensive health assessment three months after recovery from acute COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020:21.
    1. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. 2021;397((10270)):220–32.
    1. Pfeifer M, Ewig S, Voshaar T, Randerath WJ, Bauer T, Geiseler J, et al. Position paper for the state-of-the-art application of respiratory support in patients with COVID-19. Respiration. 2020;99((6)):521–42.
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2007;12((12)):1495–9.
    1. Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, Barjaktarevic IZ, Cooper BG, Hall GL, et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019 update. An official American thoracic society and european respiratory society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200((8)):e70–88.
    1. Graham BL, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Cooper BG, Jensen R, Kendrick A, et al. Executive summary: 2017 ERS/ATS standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2017 Jan;49((1)):1600016.
    1. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1324–43.
    1. Holland AE, Spruit MA, Troosters T, Puhan MA, Pepin V, Saey D, et al. Official European respiratory society/American thoracic society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014;44((6)):1428–46.
    1. Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158((5 Pt 1)):1384–7.
    1. Carsin AE, Fuertes E, Schaffner E, Jarvis D, Antó JM, Heinrich J, et al. Restrictive spirometry pattern is associated with low physical activity levels. A population based international study. Respir Med. 2019 Jan;146:116–23.
    1. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:948–68.
    1. Camporota L, Vasques F, Sanderson B, Barrett NA, Gattinoni L. Identification of pathophysiological patterns for triage and respiratory support in COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8((8)):752–4.
    1. Hippensteel JA, LaRiviere WB, Colbert JF, Langouët-Astrié CJ, Schmidt EP. Heparin as a therapy for COVID-19: current evidence and future possibilities. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2020;319((2)):L211–7.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться