Corticosteroids for periorbital and orbital cellulitis

Emily Kornelsen, Sanjay Mahant, Patricia Parkin, Lily Yuxi Ren, Yohann A Reginald, Samir S Shah, Peter J Gill, Emily Kornelsen, Sanjay Mahant, Patricia Parkin, Lily Yuxi Ren, Yohann A Reginald, Samir S Shah, Peter J Gill

Abstract

Background: Periorbital and orbital cellulitis are infections of the tissue anterior and posterior to the orbital septum, respectively, and can be difficult to differentiate clinically. Periorbital cellulitis can also progress to become orbital cellulitis. Orbital cellulitis has a relatively high incidence in children and adults, and potentially serious consequences including vision loss, meningitis, and death. Complications occur in part due to inflammatory swelling from the infection creating a compartment syndrome within the bony orbit, leading to elevated ocular pressure and compression of vasculature and the optic nerve. Corticosteroids are used in other infections to reduce this inflammation and edema, but they can lead to immune suppression and worsening infection.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive corticosteroids for periorbital and orbital cellulitis, and to assess their effectiveness and safety in children and in adults separately.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2020, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 2 March 2020.

Selection criteria: We included studies of participants diagnosed with periorbital or orbital cellulitis. We excluded studies that focused exclusively on participants who were undergoing elective endoscopic surgery, including management of infections postsurgery as well as studies conducted solely on trauma patients. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. Any study that administered corticosteroids was eligible regardless of type of steroid, route of administration, length of therapy, or timing of treatment. Comparators could include placebo, another corticosteroid, no treatment control, or another intervention.

Data collection and analysis: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane.

Main results: The search yielded 7998 records, of which 13 were selected for full-text screening. We identified one trial for inclusion. No other eligible ongoing or completed trials were identified. The included study compared the use of corticosteroids in addition to antibiotics to the use of antibiotics alone for the treatment of orbital cellulitis. The study included a total of 21 participants aged 10 years and older, of which 14 participants were randomized to corticosteroids and antibiotics and 7 participants to antibiotics alone. Participants randomized to corticosteroids and antibiotics received adjunctive corticosteroids after initial antibiotic response (mean 5.13 days), at an initial dose of 1.5 mg/kg for three days followed by 1 mg/kg for another three days before being tapered over a one- to two-week period. We assessed the included study as having an unclear risk of bias for allocation concealment, masking (blinding), selective outcome reporting, and other sources of bias. Risk of bias from sequence generation and incomplete outcome data were low. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was very low, downgraded for risk of bias (-1) and imprecision (-2). Length of hospital stay was compared between the group receiving antibiotics alone compared to the group receiving antibiotics and corticosteroids (mean difference (MD) 4.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.48 to 9.08; 21 participants). There was no observed difference in duration of antibiotics between treatment groups (MD 3.00, 95% CI -0.48 to 6.48; 21 participants). Likewise, preservation of visual acuity at 12 weeks of follow-up between group was also assessed (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.22; 21 participants). Pain scores were compared between groups on day 3 (MD -0.20, 95% CI -1.02 to 0.62; 22 eyes) along with the need for surgical intervention (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.23; 21 participants). Exposure keratopathy was reported in five participants who received corticosteroids and antibiotics and three participants who received antibiotic alone (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.63; 21 participants). No major complications of orbital cellulitis were seen in either the intervention or the control group. No side effects of corticosteroids were reported, although it is unclear which side effects were assessed.

Authors' conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of periorbital and orbital cellulitis. Since there is significant variation in how corticosteroids are used in clinical practice, additional high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials is needed to inform decision making. Future studies should explore the effects of corticosteroids in children and adults separately, and evaluate different dosing and timing of corticosteroid therapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02087527.

Conflict of interest statement

EK: none known. SM: none known. PP: none known. YAR: none known. SS: none known. PG: Has received grants from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) and The Hospital for Sick Children; nonfinancial support from the EBMLive Steering Committee, and the CIHR Institute of Human Development, Child and Youth Health. He is also a member of the CMAJ Open and BMJ Evidence Based Medicine Editorial Board.

Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus standard care, outcome: 1.1 Length of hospital stay.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus standard care, outcome: 1.2 Duration of time requiring antibiotics.
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus standard care, outcome: 1.3 Proportion of participants who required surgical intervention.
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus standard care, outcome: 1.4 Pain.
7
7
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus standard care, outcome: 1.5 Periorbital edema.
8
8
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus standard care, outcome: 1.7 Amount of proptosis (mm).
9
9
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus standard care, outcome: 1.7 Conjunctival chemosis.
10
10
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus standard care, outcome: 1.8 Preservation of visual acuity at the end of the study period.
11
11
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus standard care, outcome: 1.9 Exposure keratopathy.
1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 1: Length of hospital stay
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 2: Duration of time requiring antibiotics
1.3. Analysis
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 3: Proportion of participants who required surgical intervention
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 4: Pain
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 5: Periorbital edema
1.6. Analysis
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 6: Amount of proptosis (mm)
1.7. Analysis
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 7: Conjunctival chemosis
1.8. Analysis
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 8: Preservation of visual acuity at the end of the study period
1.9. Analysis
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 9: Exposure keratopathy
1.10. Analysis
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus standard care, Outcome 10: Other adverse events

Source: PubMed

Подписаться