Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care: prospective observational study

M van Veen, Ewout W Steyerberg, Madelon Ruige, Alfred H J van Meurs, Jolt Roukema, Johan van der Lei, Henriette A Moll, M van Veen, Ewout W Steyerberg, Madelon Ruige, Alfred H J van Meurs, Jolt Roukema, Johan van der Lei, Henriette A Moll

Abstract

Objective: To validate use of the Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Emergency departments of a university hospital and a teaching hospital in the Netherlands, 2006-7.

Participants: 17,600 children (aged <16) visiting an emergency department over 13 months (university hospital) and seven months (teaching hospital).

Intervention: Nurses triaged 16,735/17,600 patients (95%) using a computerised Manchester triage system, which calculated urgency levels from the selection of discriminators embedded in flowcharts for presenting problems. Nurses over-ruled the urgency level in 1714 (10%) children, who were excluded from analysis. Complete data for the reference standard were unavailable in 1467 (9%) children leaving 13,554 patients for analysis.

Main outcome measures: Urgency according to the Manchester triage system compared with a predefined and independently assessed reference standard for five urgency levels. This reference standard was based on a combination of vital signs at presentation, potentially life threatening conditions, diagnostic resources, therapeutic interventions, and follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for high urgency (immediate and very urgent) and 95% confidence intervals for subgroups based on age, use of flowcharts, and discriminators.

Results: The Manchester urgency level agreed with the reference standard in 4582 of 13,554 (34%) children; 7311 (54%) were over-triaged and 1661 (12%) under-triaged. The likelihood ratio was 3.0 (95% confidence interval 2.8 to 3.2) for high urgency and 0.5 (0.4 to 0.5) for low urgency; though the likelihood ratios were lower for those presenting with a medical problem (2.3 (2.2 to 2.5) v 12.0 (7.8 to 18.0) for trauma) and in younger children (2.4 (1.9 to 2.9) at 0-2 months [corrected] v 5.4 (4.5 to 6.5) at 8-16 years).

Conclusions: The Manchester triage system has moderate validity in paediatric emergency care. It errs on the safe side, with much more over-triage than under-triage compared with an independent reference standard for urgency. Triage of patients with a medical problem or in younger children is particularly difficult.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4787178/bin/vanm564443.f1.jpg
Fig 1 Manchester triage system compared with reference standard
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4787178/bin/vanm564443.f2.jpg
Fig 2 Ten commonly used medical flowcharts and validity
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4787178/bin/vanm564443.f3.jpg
Fig 3 Patients triaged with discriminator fever: relation of age to validity

References

    1. Hostetler MA, Mace S, Brown K, Finkler J, Hernandez D, Krug SE, et al. Emergency department overcrowding and children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007;23:507-15.
    1. Jimenez JG, Murray MJ, Beveridge R, Pons JP, Cortes EA, Garrigos JB, et al. Implementation of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM 2003;5:315-22.
    1. Adams SL, Fontanarosa PB. Triage of ambulatory patients. JAMA 1996;276:493-4.
    1. Mackway-Jones K, ed. Emergency triage. London: BMJ Publishing, 1997.
    1. Cooke MW, Jinks S. Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill? J Accid Emerg Med 1999;16:179-81.
    1. Speake D, Teece S, Mackway-Jones K. Detecting high-risk patients with chest pain. Emerg Nurse 2003;11:19-21.
    1. Baumann MR, Strout TD. Evaluation of the emergency severity index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:219-24.
    1. Bergeron S, Gouin S, Bailey B, Amre DK, Patel H. Agreement among pediatric health care professionals with the pediatric Canadian triage and acuity scale guidelines. Pediatr Emerg Care 2004;20:514-8.
    1. Durojaiye L, O’Meara M. A study of triage of paediatric patients in Australia. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2002;14:67-76.
    1. Gravel J, Gouin S, Bailey B, Roy M, Bergeron S, Amre D. Reliability of a computerized version of the pediatric Canadian triage and acuity scale. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:864-9.
    1. 11Maldonado T, Avner JR. Triage of the pediatric patient in the emergency department: are we all in agreement? Pediatrics 2004;114:356-60.
    1. 12Van der Wulp I, van Baar ME, Schrijvers AJ. Reliability and validity of the Manchester triage system in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study. Emerg Med J 2008;25:431-4.
    1. Gouin S, Gravel J, Amre DK, Bergeron S. Evaluation of the pediatric Canadian triage and acuity scale in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:243-7.
    1. Maningas PA, Hime DA, Parker DE. The use of the Soterion rapid triage system in children presenting to the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2006;31:353-9.
    1. Roukema J, Steyerberg EW, van Meurs A, Ruige M, van der Lei J, Moll HA. Validity of the Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care. Emerg Med J 2006;23:906-10.
    1. Statistics Netherlands. Statistics local districts. .
    1. Mackway-Jones K. Triage voor de spoedeisende hulp. Manchester triage group. Maarsen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg, 2002.
    1. Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE. PRISM III: an updated pediatric risk of mortality score. Crit Care Med 1996;24:743-52.
    1. Trautner BW, Caviness AC, Gerlacher GR, Demmler G, Macias CG. Prospective evaluation of the risk of serious bacterial infection in children who present to the emergency department with hyperpyrexia (temperature of 106 degrees F or higher). Pediatrics 2006;118:34-40.
    1. Chamberlain JM, Patel KM, Pollack MM. The pediatric risk of hospital admission score: a second-generation severity-of-illness score for pediatric emergency patients. Pediatrics 2005;115:388-95.
    1. Gorelick MH, Lee C, Cronan K, Kost S, Palmer K. Pediatric emergency assessment tool (PEAT): a risk-adjustment measure for pediatric emergency patients. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:156-62.
    1. Advanced Life Support Group, Mackway-Jones K, Molyneux E, Phillips B, Wieteska S. Advanced paediatric life support. London: BMJ Publishing, 2001.
    1. Armon K, Stephenson T, MacFaul R, Eccleston P, Werneke U. An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management. Arch Dis Child 2001;85:132-42.
    1. McGovern MC, Smith MB. Causes of apparent life threatening events in infants: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:1043-8.
    1. Vergouwe Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:475-83.
    1. Hunink M, Glasziou P, Siegel P, Weeks J, Pliskin J, Elstein A, et al. Decision making in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    1. Sur DK, Bukont EL. Evaluating fever of unidentifiable source in young children. Am Fam Physician 2007;75:1805-11.
    1. Gilboy N, Tanabe P, Travers DA. The emergency severity index. Version 4: changes to ESI level 1 and pediatric fever criteria. J Emerg Nurs 2005;31:357-62.
    1. Gravel J, Manzano S, Arsenault M. Safety of a modification of the triage level for febrile children 6 to 36 months old using the pediatric Canadian triage and acuity scale. CJEM 2008;10:32-7.
    1. Twomey M, Wallis LA, Myers JE. Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales. Emerg Med J 2007;24:477-9.
    1. Cooper RJ. Emergency department triage: why we need a research agenda. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44:524-6.
    1. Bindman AB. Triage in accident and emergency departments. BMJ 1995;311:404.
    1. Windle J, Mackway-Jones K. Don’t throw triage out with the bathwater. Emerg Med J 2003;20:119-20.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться