Haplotype and phenotype analysis of six recurrent BRCA1 mutations in 61 families: results of an international study

S L Neuhausen, S Mazoyer, L Friedman, M Stratton, K Offit, A Caligo, G Tomlinson, L Cannon-Albright, T Bishop, D Kelsell, E Solomon, B Weber, F Couch, J Struewing, P Tonin, F Durocher, S Narod, M H Skolnick, G Lenoir, O Serova, B Ponder, D Stoppa-Lyonnet, D Easton, M C King, D E Goldgar, S L Neuhausen, S Mazoyer, L Friedman, M Stratton, K Offit, A Caligo, G Tomlinson, L Cannon-Albright, T Bishop, D Kelsell, E Solomon, B Weber, F Couch, J Struewing, P Tonin, F Durocher, S Narod, M H Skolnick, G Lenoir, O Serova, B Ponder, D Stoppa-Lyonnet, D Easton, M C King, D E Goldgar

Abstract

Several BRCA1 mutations have now been found to occur in geographically diverse breast and ovarian cancer families. To investigate mutation origin and mutation-specific phenotypes due to BRCA1, we constructed a haplotype of nine polymorphic markers within or immediately flanking the BRCA1 locus in a set of 61 breast/ovarian cancer families selected for having one of six recurrent BRCA1 mutations. Tests of both mutations and family-specific differences in age at diagnosis were not significant. A comparison of the six mutations in the relative proportions of cases of breast and ovarian cancer was suggestive of an effect (P = .069), with 57% of women presumed affected because of the 1294 del 40 BRCA1 mutation having ovarian cancer, compared with 14% of affected women with the splice-site mutation in intron 5 of BRCA1. For the BRCA1 mutations studied here, the individual mutations are estimated to have arisen 9-170 generations ago. In general, a high degree of haplotype conservation across the region was observed, with haplotype differences most often due to mutations in the short-tandem-repeat markers, although some likely instances of recombination also were observed. For several of the instances, there was evidence for multiple, independent, BRCA1 mutational events.

References

    1. Lancet. 1991 Jul 13;338(8759):82-3
    1. Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Jul;2(7):1007-14
    1. Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Jul;2(7):1015-22
    1. Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Aug;2(8):1123-8
    1. Nat Genet. 1992 Nov;2(3):204-11
    1. Science. 1994 Oct 7;266(5182):66-71
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):18-32
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):265-71
    1. JAMA. 1995 Feb 15;273(7):535-41
    1. Hum Mol Genet. 1994 Nov;3(11):1919-26
    1. Nat Genet. 1994 Dec;8(4):387-91
    1. Nat Genet. 1994 Dec;8(4):392-8
    1. Nat Genet. 1994 Dec;8(4):399-404
    1. Nat Genet. 1995 Feb;9(2):152-9
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jun;56(6):1315-9
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jul;57(1):1-7
    1. Nat Genet. 1995 Jun;10(2):208-12
    1. Nat Genet. 1995 Oct;11(2):198-200
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jul;57(1):189
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Apr;68(4):820-3
    1. Genomics. 1989 Nov;5(4):874-9

Source: PubMed

Подписаться