Comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study

Gudrun Höskuldsdottir, My Engström, Araz Rawshani, Frida Lenér, Ville Wallenius, Lars Fändriks, Karin Mossberg, Björn Eliasson, Gudrun Höskuldsdottir, My Engström, Araz Rawshani, Frida Lenér, Ville Wallenius, Lars Fändriks, Karin Mossberg, Björn Eliasson

Abstract

Objectives: To compare long-term effects and complications of medical treatment (MT) of obesity including very low energy diet with bariatric surgery.

Design and setting: This prospective study conducted in a clinical setting recruited individuals with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 referred for obesity treatment. Demographic and anthropometric data, laboratory samples, and questionnaire replies were collected at baseline and 2 years.

Participants and interventions: 971 individuals were recruited 2015-2017. 382 received MT, 388 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and 201 sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes included changes in anthropometric measures, metabolic variables and safety. These were analysed using a linear regression model. A logistic regression model was used to analyse composite variables for treatment success (secondary outcomes). A random forest (RF) model was used to examine the importance of 15 clinical domains as predictors for successful treatment.

Results: Two-year data were available for 667 individuals (68.7%). Regarding primary outcomes, the decrease in excess BMI was 27.5%, 82.5% and 70.3% and proportion achieving a weight of >10% was 45.3%, 99.6% and 95.6% for MT, RYGB and SG, respectively (p<0.001). The groups were comparable regarding levels of vitamins, minerals and haemoglobin or safety measures. Likelihood for success (secondary outcome) was higher in the surgical groups (RYGB: OR 5.3 (95% CI 3.9 to 7.2) vs SG: OR 4.3 ((95% CI 3.0 to 6.2)) in reference to MT. Baseline anthropometry had the strongest predictive value for treatment success, according to the RF model.

Conclusions: In clinical practice, bariatric surgery by RYGB or SG is most effective, but meaningful weight loss is achievable by MT with strict caloric restriction and stepwise introduction of a normal diet. All treatments showed positive effects on well-being, cardiovascular risk factors, and levels of vitamins and minerals at 2-year follow-up and groups were similar regarding safety measures.

Trial registration number: NCT03152617.

Keywords: adult surgery; diabetes & endocrinology; nutrition & dietetics.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: BE reports personal fees (expert panels, lectures) from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Navamedic, NovoNordisk, RLS Global, and grants and personal fees from Sanofi, all outside the submitted work.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in clinical variables presented as estimated means with 95% CIs. Missing data patterns, before and after imputation with multiple imputation by chained equations. AUDIT, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; BE, binge eating; BN, bulimia nervosa; BNC, bulimia nervosa with compensatory behaviour; CR, cognitive restraint; EE, emotional eating; EQ-5D, EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire; MT, medical Treatment; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; QEWPR, Questionnaire on eating and weight patterns, revised; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SG, sleeve gastrectomy; SGQ, Saltin Grimby Questionnaire; TFEQ, three-Factor Eating Questionnaire; UE, uncontrolled eating.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Likelihood for successful or unsuccessful treatment. Successful treatment is defined as as a decrease in excess body mass index (BMI) of at least 50% or a BMI of less than 30 kg/m2 at 2-year follow-up without the need for surgical treatment or hospital ward during the follow-up period. Unsuccessful treatment is defined as a loss of less than 25% of excess BMI (EBMI) or the need for surgical or hospital ward during the follow-up period. MT, medical treatment; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SG, sleeve gastrectomy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predictive value of 15 clinical domains on the success of obesity treatment (A) and for different treatment groups (B–D). ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ALAT, alanine aminotransferase; ASAT, aspartate aminotransferase; AUDIT, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; BAI, Becks Anxiety Inventory; BMI, body mass index; CV, cardiovascular; DM, diabetes mellitus; EQ-5D, EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HDL, high density lipoprotein; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PPI, proton-pump inhibitors; QEWP, Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns; SGQ, Saltin Grimby Questionnaire; T4, thyroxine; TFEQ, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire; TG, triglycerides; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

References

    1. Dai H, Alsalhe TA, Chalghaf N, et al. . The global burden of disease attributable to high body mass index in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: an analysis of the global burden of disease study. PLoS Med 2020;17:e1003198. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003198
    1. Dawes AJ, Maggard-Gibbons M, Maher AR, et al. . Mental health conditions among patients seeking and undergoing bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2016;315:150–63. 10.1001/jama.2015.18118
    1. Ma C, Avenell A, Bolland M, et al. . Effects of weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2017;359:j4849. 10.1136/bmj.j4849
    1. Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. . Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2007;357:741–52. 10.1056/NEJMoa066254
    1. Wiggins T, Guidozzi N, Welbourn R, et al. . Association of bariatric surgery with all-cause mortality and incidence of obesity-related disease at a population level: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2020;17:e1003206. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003206
    1. Sjöström L, Lindroos A-K, Peltonen M, et al. . Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2683–93. 10.1056/NEJMoa035622
    1. Sundbom M, Hedberg J, Marsk R, et al. . Substantial decrease in comorbidity 5 years after gastric bypass: a population-based study from the Scandinavian obesity surgery registry. Ann Surg 2017;265:1166–71. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001920
    1. Eliasson B, Liakopoulos V, Franzén S, et al. . Cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery in Sweden: a nationwide, matched, observational cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:847–54. 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00334-4
    1. Nuzzo A, Czernichow S, Hertig A, et al. . Prevention and treatment of nutritional complications after bariatric surgery. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6:238–51. 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30331-9
    1. Järvholm K, Bruze G, Peltonen M, et al. . 5-year mental health and eating pattern outcomes following bariatric surgery in adolescents: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2020;4:210–9. 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30024-9
    1. Neovius M, Bruze G, Jacobson P, et al. . Risk of suicide and non-fatal self-harm after bariatric surgery: results from two matched cohort studies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018;6:197–207. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30437-0
    1. Kauppila JH, Santoni G, Tao W, et al. . Risk factors for suicide after bariatric surgery in a population-based nationwide study in five Nordic countries. Ann Surg 2022;275:e410–4. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004232
    1. Liakopoulos V, Svensson Ann-M, Naslund I, et al. . The pros and cons of gastric bypass surgery in obese individuals with type 2 Diabetes—Nationwide, matched, observational cohort study. Diabetes 2018;67. 10.2337/db18-131-OR
    1. Carlsson LMS, Sjöholm K, Jacobson P, et al. . Life expectancy after bariatric surgery in the Swedish obese subjects study. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1535–43. 10.1056/NEJMoa2002449
    1. Kauppila JH, Tao W, Santoni G, et al. . Effects of obesity surgery on overall and disease-specific mortality in a 5-Country population-based study. Gastroenterology 2019;157:119–27. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.048
    1. Lean ME, Leslie WS, Barnes AC, et al. . Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2018;391:541–51. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33102-1
    1. Parretti HM, Jebb SA, Johns DJ, et al. . Clinical effectiveness of very-low-energy diets in the management of weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 2016;17:225–34. 10.1111/obr.12366
    1. Sjöström L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial - a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med 2013;273:219–34. 10.1111/joim.12012
    1. Höskuldsdóttir G, Mossberg K, Wallenius V, et al. . Design and baseline data in the BAriatic surgery substitution and nutrition study (BASUN): a 10-year prospective cohort study. BMC Endocr Disord 2020;20:23. 10.1186/s12902-020-0503-z
    1. Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Gerber RA, et al. . Psychometric analysis of the three-factor eating questionnaire-R21: results from a large diverse sample of obese and non-obese participants. Int J Obes 2009;33:611–20. 10.1038/ijo.2009.74
    1. Borges MBF, Morgan CM, Claudino AM, et al. . Validation of the Portuguese version of the questionnaire on eating and weight Patterns-Revised (QEWP-R) for the screening of binge eating disorder. Braz J Psychiatry 2005;27:319–22. 10.1590/S1516-44462005000400012
    1. Grimby G, Börjesson M, Jonsdottir IH, et al. . The "saltin-grimby physical activity level scale" and its application to health research. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015;25:119–25. 10.1111/sms.12611
    1. Krops LA, Wolthuizen L, Dijkstra PU, et al. . Reliability of translation of the RAND 36-item health survey in a post-rehabilitation population. Int J Rehabil Res 2018;41:128–37. 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000265
    1. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan VH. EQ-5D scores for diabetes-related comorbidities. Value Health 2016;19:1002–8. 10.1016/j.jval.2016.05.018
    1. Steer RA BA. Beck anxiety inventory. In: Wood CP, ed. Evaluating stress: a book of resources. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education, 1997: 23–40.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–13. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
    1. Babor TF H-BJ, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. AUDIT: the alcohol use disorders identification test guidelines for use in primary care. 2nd edn. World Health Organization, 2001.
    1. Strobl C, Boulesteix A-L, Kneib T, et al. . Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:307. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-307
    1. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med 2021. 10.1056/NEJMoa2032183
    1. Frias JP, Nauck MA, Van J, et al. . Efficacy and safety of LY3298176, a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet 2018;392:2180–93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32260-8
    1. Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, et al. . Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319:241–54. 10.1001/jama.2017.20313
    1. Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Vetter D, et al. . Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus roux-Y-gastric bypass for morbid obesity-3-year outcomes of the prospective randomized swiss multicenter bypass or sleeve study (SM-BOSS). Ann Surg 2017;265:466–73. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001929
    1. Han Y, Jia Y, Wang H, et al. . Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies. Int J Surg 2020;76:101–10. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.035
    1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. . Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes — 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2017;376:641–51. 10.1056/NEJMoa1600869
    1. Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. . Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2013;347:f5934. 10.1136/bmj.f5934
    1. Benaiges D, Climent E, Goday A, et al. . Mid-term results of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared-results of the SLEEVEPASS and SM-BOSS trials. Ann Transl Med 2018;6:S83. 10.21037/atm.2018.10.70
    1. Hofsø D, Fatima F, Borgeraas H, et al. . Gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes (Oseberg): a single-centre, triple-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019;7:912–24. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30344-4
    1. Jassil FC, Carnemolla A, Kingett H, et al. . Protocol for a 1-year prospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: the BARI-LIFESTYLE observational study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020659. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020659

Source: PubMed

Подписаться