Using mixed methods in health research

Shema Tariq, Jenny Woodman, Shema Tariq, Jenny Woodman

Abstract

Mixed methods research is the use of quantitative and qualitative methods in a single study or series of studies. It is an emergent methodology which is increasingly used by health researchers, especially within health services research. There is a growing literature on the theory, design and critical appraisal of mixed methods research. However, there are few papers that summarize this methodological approach for health practitioners who wish to conduct or critically engage with mixed methods studies. The objective of this paper is to provide an accessible introduction to mixed methods for clinicians and researchers unfamiliar with this approach. We present a synthesis of key methodological literature on mixed methods research, with examples from our own work and that of others, to illustrate the practical applications of this approach within health research. We summarize definitions of mixed methods research, the value of this approach, key aspects of study design and analysis, and discuss the potential challenges of combining quantitative and qualitative methods and data. One of the key challenges within mixed methods research is the successful integration of quantitative and qualitative data during analysis and interpretation. However, the integration of different types of data can generate insights into a research question, resulting in enriched understanding of complex health research problems.

References

    1. Harding G, Gantley M. Qualitative methods: beyond the cookbook. Fam Pract 1998; 15: 76–9
    1. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2007; 7: 85–85
    1. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2007
    1. Woodman J, Allister J, Rafi I, et al. A simple approach to improve recording of concerns about child maltreatment in primary care records: developing a quality improvement intervention. Br J Gen Pract 2012; 62: e478–86
    1. Woodman J, Freemantle N, Allister J, de Lusignan S, Gilbert R, Petersen I. Variation in recorded child maltreatment concerns in UK primary care records: a cohort study using the health improvement network (THIN) database. PLoS One 2012; 7: e49808–e49808
    1. Tariq S, Elford J, Cortina-Borja M, Tookey PA. On behalf of the National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood. The association between ethnicity and late presentation to antenatal care among pregnant women living with HIV in the UK and Ireland. AIDS Care 2012; 24: 978–85
    1. Tariq S, Pillen A, Tookey PA, Brown AE, Elford J. The impact of African ethnicity and migration on pregnancy in women living with HIV in the UK: design and methods. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 596–596
    1. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: 1–274
    1. Raven M, Doran K, Kostrowski S, Gillespie C, Elbel B. An intervention to improve care and reduce costs for high-risk patients with frequent hospital admissions: a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 270–270
    1. Nicca D, Fierz K, Happ MB, Spirig R. Symptom management in HIV/AIDS Symptom Management in HIV/AIDS: a mixed methods approach to describe collaboration and concordance between persons living with HIV and their close support persons. J Mix Methods Res 2012;3:217–35.
    1. Greene J, Caracelli V, Graham W. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal 1989; 11: 255–74
    1. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 42–5
    1. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008; 13: 92–8
    1. Benning A, Ghaleb M, Suokas A, et al. Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation. BMJ 2011; 342: d195–d195
    1. Krein Sarah L, Kowalski C, Damschroder L, Forman J, Kaufman S, Saint S. Preventing ventilator associated pneumonia in the United States: a multicenter mixed methods study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29: 933–40
    1. Stoller EP, Webster NJ, Blixen CE, et al. Alcohol consumption decisions among nonabusing drinkers diagnosed with hepatitis C. J Mix Methods Res 2009; 3: 65–86
    1. Montgomery CM, Gafos M, Lees S, et al. Re-framing microbicide acceptability: findings from the MDP301 trial. Cult Health Sex 2010; 12: 649–62
    1. Harden A, Brunton G, Fletcher A, Oakley A. Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage: systematic review integrating controlled trials and qualitative studies. BMJ 2009; 339: b4254–b4254
    1. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010; 341: 4587–4587
    1. Caracelli V, Greene J. Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal 1993; 15: 195–207
    1. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998
    1. Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health 2000; 23: 246–55
    1. Bryman A. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mix Methods Res 2007; 1: 8–22
    1. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 2004; 33: 14–26
    1. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1996] 1962
    1. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or dysfunctional? Team working in mixed-methods research. Qual Health Res 2008; 18: 1574–85

Source: PubMed

Подписаться