A comparison of Kneipp hydrotherapy with conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: protocol of a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial

Martin Schencking, Adriane Otto, Tobias Deutsch, Hagen Sandholzer, Martin Schencking, Adriane Otto, Tobias Deutsch, Hagen Sandholzer

Abstract

Background: The increasing age of the population, especially in the western world, means that the prevalence of osteoarthritis is also increasing, with corresponding socioeconomic consequences. Although there is no curative intervention at present, in accordance with US and European guidelines, pharmacotherapeutic and non-pharmacological approaches aim at pain control and the reduction of functional restriction.It has been established that hydrotherapy for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee joint using serial cold and warm water stimulation not only improves the range of movement but also reduces pain significantly and increases quality of life over a period of up to three months. Weight reduction is important for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. In addition, conventional physiotherapy and exercise therapy have both been shown, at a high level of evidence, to be cost-effective and to have long-term benefits for pain relief, movement in the affected joint, and patient quality of life.

Methods/design: The study design consists of a prospective randomised controlled three-armed clinical trial, which will be carried out at a specialist clinic for integrative medicine, to investigate the clinical effects of hydrotherapy on osteoarthritis of the knee or hip joint, in comparison with conventional physiotherapy.One hundred and eighty patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of hip or knee will be randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups: hydrotherapy, physiotherapy, and both physiotherapy and hydrotherapy of the affected joint. In the first group, patients will receive Kneipp hydrotherapy daily, with water applied in the form of alternate cold and warm thigh affusions (alternating cold and warm water stimulation is particularly relevant to the knee and hip regions).Patients in the second group will receive physiotherapy of the hip or knee joint three times a week. Patients in the physiotherapy-hydrotherapy combination group will receive both joint-specific physiotherapy three times a week and alternate cold and warm thigh affusions every day. Follow-up assessments will be on three levels: clinical assessment by the investigator; subjective patient assessment consisting of a patient diary, and questionnaires on admission and at the end of the treatment phase; and a final telephone assessment by the external evaluation centre. Assessments will be made at baseline, after two weeks of inpatient treatment, and finally after a further ten weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome measure will be pain intensity of the affected joint in the course of inpatient treatment, judged by the patient and the investigator. Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life and joint-specific pain and mobility in the course of the study. Statistical analysis of the results will be on an intention-to-treat basis.

Conclusion: This study methodology has been conceived according to the standards of the CONSORT recommendations. The results will contribute to establishing hydrotherapy as a non-invasive, non-interventional, reasonably priced, therapeutic option with few side effects, in the concomitant treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Trial registration number: NCT 00950326.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00950326.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Alternate thigh affusion according to Kneipp – flow direction (repeated cold/warm water stimulation). The thigh affusion is poured starting from the back of the foot up the outer aspect of the back of the leg, slowly over the buttocks ("starting away from the heart going towards the heart"), from there moving to the front aspect of the leg, lingering in the groin, and finally pouring the water over the inner aspect of the leg downwards.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart describing the participant flow through the study. Diagramm over the participant flow through recruitment, randomization, baseline measurement, post-treatment and 3 month follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schedule of data acquisition. [pq = physicians questionnaire]. EQ-5D = EuroQol questionnaire; AIMS2-SF = Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale.

References

    1. Buckwalter JA, Saltzman C, Brown T. The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004:S6–15. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000143938.30681.9d.
    1. Aigner T, Rose J, Martin J, Buckwalter J. Aging theories of primary osteoarthritis: from epidemiology to molecular biology. Rejuvenation Res. 2004;7:134–145. doi: 10.1089/1549168041552964.
    1. Lohmander LS, Gerhardsson d V, Rollof J, Nilsson PM, Engstrom G. Incidence of severe knee and hip osteoarthritis in relation to different measures of body mass: a population-based prospective cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:490–496. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.089748.
    1. Bijlsma JW, Knahr K. Strategies for the prevention and management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Best Pract Res ClinRheumatol. 2007;21:59–76. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2006.08.013.
    1. Berman BM, Lao L, Langenberg P, Lee WL, Gilpin AMK, Hochberg M. Effectiveness of Acupuncture as Adjunctive Therapy in Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Ann intern Med. 2004;141:901–910.
    1. Leardini G, Mascia MT, Stisi S, Sandri G, Franceschini M. [Sanitary costs of osteoarthritis] Reumatismo. 2001;53:316–322.
    1. Solignac M. [COART France 2003 report on new socioeconomic data on osteoarthritis in France] Presse Med. 2004;33:S4–S6.
    1. Zochling J, March L, Lapsley H, Cross M, Tribe K, Brooks P. Use of complementary medicines for osteoarthritis–a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:549–554. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.010637.
    1. Biggee BA, McAlindon T. Glucosamine for osteoarthritis: part I, review of the clinical evidence. Med Health R I. 2004;87:176–179.
    1. Ernst E. Complementary and alternative medicine inrheumatology. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000;14:731–749. doi: 10.1053/berh.2000.0110.
    1. Bartels EM, Lund H, Hagen KB, Dagfinrud H, Christensen R, Danneskiold-Samsøe B. Aquatic exercise for the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007. p. CD005523.
    1. Verhagen AP, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Boers M, Cardoso JR, Lambeck J, de Bie R, de Vet HCW. Balneotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004. p. CD000518.
    1. Brosseau L, Yonge KA, Welch V, Marchand S, Judd M, Wells GA, Tugwell P. Thermotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003. p. CD004522.
    1. Fransen M, McConnell S. Exercise for osteoarthritis ofthe knee. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008. p. CD004376.
    1. Katz P, Lee F. Racial/ethnic differences in the use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with arthritis. J ClinRheumatol. 2007;13:3–11.
    1. Doering TJ, Thiel J, Steuernagel B, Johannes B, Konitzer M, Niederstadt C, et al. [Changes of cognitive brain functions in the elderly by Kneipp therapy] Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2001;8:80–84. doi: 10.1159/000057200.
    1. Goedsche K, Forster M, Kroegel C, Uhlemann C. [Repeated cold water stimulations (hydrotherapy according to Kneipp) in patients withCOPD] Forsch Komplementmed. 2007;14:158–166. doi: 10.1159/000101948.
    1. Foley A, et al. Does hydrotherapy improve strength and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis – a randomised controlled trial comparing a gym based and a hydrotherapy based strengthening programme. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:1162–1167. doi: 10.1136/ard.2002.005272.
    1. Franke K. [The value of minor hydrotherapy (Kneipp method) for the prevention and rehabilitation of arthritis and vascular collagendiseases.] Hippokrates. 1961;32:92–94.
    1. Koeppen S, Kostka F. [Hydrotherapy of cardiovascular diseases in the hospital and in practice (Kneipp therapy).] Med Klin. 1960;55:185–188.
    1. Koeppen S, Kostka F. [Kneipp therapy of cardiovascular diseases in clinics.] Hippokrates. 1959;30:201–205.
    1. Ring J, Teichmann W. [Immunological changes duringhydrotherapy] Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1977;102:1625–1630.
    1. Kreutzfeldt A, Albrecht B, Müller K. [Einfluß des Wassertretens nach Kneipp auf die Immunregulation] Phys Med Rehab Kuror. 2003;13:208–214. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41367.
    1. Silva LE, Valim V, Pessanha AP, Oliveira LM, Myamoto S, Jones A, Natour J. Hydrotherapy versus conventional land-based exercise for the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised clinicaltrial. Phys Ther. 2008;88:12–21.
    1. Stener-Victorin E, Kruse-Smidje C, Jung K. Comparison between electro-acupuncture and hydrotherapy, both in combination with patient education and patient education alone, on the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:179–185. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200405000-00008.
    1. Bachmann R, Schleinkofer G. Natürlich gesund mit Kneipp. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2000.
    1. Lange AK, Vanwanseele B, Fiatarone Singh MA. Strength training for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1488–1494. doi: 10.1002/art.24118.
    1. Bulthuis Y, Mohammad S, Braakman-Jansen LM, Drossaers-Bakker KW, Laar MA van de. Cost-effectiveness of intensive exercise therapy directly following hospital discharge in patients with arthritis: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:247–254. doi: 10.1002/art.23332.
    1. Jamtvedt G, Dahm KT, Christie A, Moe RH, Haavardsholm E, Holm I, Hagen KB. Physical therapy interventions for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: an overview of systematic reviews. Phys Ther. 2008;88:123–136.
    1. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HU. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: What is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997;72:95–7. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00005-5.
    1. Maxwell C. Sensitivity and accuracy of the visual analogue scale: a psycho-physical classroom experiment. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978;6:15–24.
    1. Rosemann T, Szecsenyi J. Cultural adaption and validation of a German version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS2) Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15:1128–33. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.03.021.
    1. Lequesne M. Clinical and roentgenologic follow-up of hip and knee arthrosis-methods and results. Z Rheumatol. 1994;53:243–9.
    1. Grimmig H, Melzer C, Ludwig FJ, Daalmann HH. Using the Lequesne questionnaires for patients with hip and knee disabilities in daily routine to reflect the quality of outcome in rehabilitation. ZOrthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002;140:452–9. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33399.
    1. Maurischat C, Ehlebracht-König I, Kühn A, Bullinger M. Structural validity of the Short form 36 (SF 36) in patients with rheumaticdiseases. Z Rheumatol. 2005;64:255–64. doi: 10.1007/s00393-005-0676-x.
    1. Bullinger M. Assessment of health related qualitiy of life with the SF-36 Health Survey. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 1996;35:XVII–XXVII.
    1. Botolfsen P, Helbostad JL, Moe-Nielssen R, Wall JC. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Expanded Timed Up and Go test in older people with impaired mobility. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13:94–106. doi: 10.1002/pri.394.
    1. Arnold CM, Faulkner RA. The history of falls and the association of the timed up and go test to falls and near falls in older adults with hip osteoarthritis. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-7-17.
    1. Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, Koh DR, Nq SC, Yoon KH, Vasoo S, Li SC, Thumboo J. A comparison of the EuroQol-5D and the Health Utility Index mark 3 in patients with rheumatic disease. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:2268–74.
    1. Elders MJ. The increasing impact of arthritis on publichealth. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2000;60:6–8.
    1. ADT-Panel 2008, Zentralinstitut für die Kassenärztliche Versorgung in Deutschland
    1. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gangier JJ, Altmann DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, Oxman AD, Moher D. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008;337:a2390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2390.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться