Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for patients with diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews

Spyros Kitsiou, Guy Paré, Mirou Jaana, Ben Gerber, Spyros Kitsiou, Guy Paré, Mirou Jaana, Ben Gerber

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is a common chronic disease that places an unprecedented strain on health care systems worldwide. Mobile health technologies such as smartphones, mobile applications, and wearable devices, known as mHealth, offer significant and innovative opportunities for improving patient to provider communication and self-management of diabetes.

Objective: The purpose of this overview is to critically appraise and consolidate evidence from multiple systematic reviews on the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for patients with diabetes to inform policy makers, practitioners, and researchers.

Methods: A comprehensive search on multiple databases was performed to identify relevant systematic reviews published between January 1996 and December 2015. Two authors independently selected reviews, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using AMSTAR.

Results: Fifteen systematic reviews published between 2008 and 2014 were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the reviews varied considerably and most of them had important methodological limitations. Focusing on systematic reviews that offered the most direct evidence, this overview demonstrates that on average, mHealth interventions improve glycemic control (HbA1c) compared to standard care or other non-mHealth approaches by as much as 0.8% for patients with type 2 diabetes and 0.3% for patients with type 1 diabetes, at least in the short-term (≤12 months). However, limitations in the overall quality of evidence suggest that further research will likely have an important impact in these estimates of effect.

Conclusions: Findings are consistent with clinically relevant improvements, particularly with respect to patients with type 2 diabetes. Similar to home telemonitoring, mHealth interventions represent a promising approach for self-management of diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Screen and selection process.
Fig 1. Screen and selection process.
Fig 2. Citation matrix of previously published…
Fig 2. Citation matrix of previously published reports of randomized controlled and cross-over trials included in the systematic reviews (all references are available in S4 Appendix).
Fig 3. Citation matrix of previously published…
Fig 3. Citation matrix of previously published observational, non-randomized controlled, and uncontrolled trials included in the systematic reviews (all references are available in S4 Appendix).

References

    1. Tuttle KR, Bakris GL, Bilous RW, Chiang JL, de Boer IH, Goldstein-Fuchs J, et al. Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(4):510–33. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.08.001
    1. American Diabetes Association. 9. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care. Diabetes Care. 2016;39 Suppl 1:S72–80.
    1. American Diabetes Association. 8. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management. Diabetes Care. 2016;39 Suppl 1:S60–71.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):1033–46. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3609540. 10.2337/dc12-2625
    1. WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
    1. WHO. Global Health Estimates: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex and Country, 2000–2012. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
    1. Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, Duker P, Funnell MM, Fischl AH, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Educ. 2015;41(4):417–30. 10.1177/0145721715588904
    1. Nagelkerk J, Reick K, Meengs L. Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(2):151–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03799.x
    1. International Telecommunication Union. ICT facts and \ures. Geneva, Switzerland: International Telecommunication Union, 2014.
    1. Goyal S, Cafazzo JA. Mobile phone health apps for diabetes management: current evidence and future developments. QJM. 2013;106(12):1067–9. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3840330. 10.1093/qjmed/hct203
    1. Cafazzo JA, Casselman M, Hamming N, Katzman DK, Palmert MR. Design of an mHealth app for the self-management of adolescent type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e70 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3799540. 10.2196/jmir.2058
    1. Hall AK, Cole-Lewis H, Bernhardt JM. Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:393–415. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4406229. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122855
    1. Kitsiou S, Pare G, Jaana M. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological quality. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e150 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3785977. 10.2196/jmir.2770
    1. Kitsiou S, Paré G, Jaana M. Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015;17(3):e63 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4376138. 10.2196/jmir.4174
    1. Paré G, Trudel M-C, Jaana M, Kitsiou S. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management. 2015;52(2):183–99.
    1. Worswick J, Wayne SC, Bennett R, Fiander M, Mayhew A, Weir MC, et al. Improving quality of care for persons with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews—what does the evidence tell us? Syst Rev. 2013;2:26 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3667096. 10.1186/2046-4053-2-26
    1. Becker LA, Oxman AD. Overviews of Reviews In: Higgins JPT, Becker LA, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008. p. 607–31.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000097 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2707599. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
    1. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013–20. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
    1. Baron J, McBain H, Newman S. The impact of mobile monitoring technologies on glycosylated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2012;6:1185–96. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3570854. 10.1177/193229681200600524
    1. Buhi ER, Trudnak TE, Martinasek MP, Oberne AB, Fuhrmann HJ, McDermott RJ. Mobile phone-based behavioural interventions for health: A systematic review. Health Education Journal. 2013;72:564–83.
    1. Cole-Lewis H, Kershaw T. Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiologic Reviews. 2010;32:56–69. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3082846. 10.1093/epirev/mxq004
    1. de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online). 2012;12:CD007459 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2
    1. Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3548655. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362
    1. Herbert L, Owen V, Pascarella L, Streisand R. Text message interventions for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics. 2013;15:362–70. 10.1089/dia.2012.0291
    1. Holtz B, Lauckner C. Diabetes management via mobile phones: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18:175–84. 10.1089/tmj.2011.0119
    1. Krishna S, Boren SA. Diabetes self-management care via cell phone: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2:509–17. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2769746. 10.1177/193229680800200324
    1. Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas EA. Healthcare via cell phones: A systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2009;15:231–40. 10.1089/tmj.2008.0099
    1. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, Cao J, Chen J, Mo X, et al. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011;28(4):455–63. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03180.x
    1. Pal K, Eastwood SV, Michie S, Farmer AJ, Barnard ML, Peacock R, et al. Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013;3:CD008776.
    1. Russell-Minda E, Jutai J, Speechley M, Bradley K, Chudyk A, Petrella R. Health technologies for monitoring and managing diabetes: a systematic review. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2009;3:1460–71. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2787048. 10.1177/193229680900300628
    1. Saffari M, Ghanizadeh G, Koenig HG. Health education via mobile text messaging for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes. 2014;8(4):275–85. 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.03.004
    1. Sutcliffe P, Martin S, Sturt J, Powell J, Griffiths F, Adams A, et al. Systematic review of communication technologies to promote access and engagement of young people with diabetes into healthcare. BMC Endocr Disord. 2011;11:1 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3024230. 10.1186/1472-6823-11-1
    1. Tao D, Or CK. Effects of self-management health information technology on glycaemic control for patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(3):133–43. 10.1177/1357633X13479701
    1. Pal K, Eastwood SV, Michie S, Farmer A, Barnard ML, Peacock R, et al. Computer-based interventions to improve self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1759–66. 10.2337/dc13-1386
    1. Paré G, Tate M, Johnstone D, Kitsiou S. Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews. European Journal of Information Systems. 2016;25(6):493–508.
    1. Pillay J, Armstrong MJ, Butalia S, Donovan LE, Sigal RJ, Chordiya P, et al. Behavioral Programs for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(11):836–47. 10.7326/M15-1399
    1. Gerber BS, Solomon MC, Shaffer TL, Quinn MT, Lipton RB. Evaluation of an internet diabetes self-management training program for adolescents and young adults. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007;9(1):60–7. 10.1089/dia.2006.0058
    1. Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e104 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4004144. 10.2196/jmir.2968
    1. Breland JY, Yeh VM, Yu J. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines among diabetes self-management apps. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(3):277–86. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3771007. 10.1007/s13142-013-0205-4
    1. Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, Nilsen W, Allison SM, Mermelstein R. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Transl Behav Med. 2011;1(1):53–71. 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться