The effects of instructions on dual-task walking and cognitive task performance in people with Parkinson's disease

Valerie E Kelly, Alexis J Eusterbrock, Anne Shumway-Cook, Valerie E Kelly, Alexis J Eusterbrock, Anne Shumway-Cook

Abstract

Gait impairments are prevalent among people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Instructions to focus on walking can improve walking in PD, but the use of such a cognitive strategy may be limited under dual-task walking conditions, when walking is performed simultaneously with concurrent cognitive or motor tasks. This study examined how dual-task performance of walking and a concurrent cognitive task was affected by instructions in people with PD compared to healthy young and older individuals. Dual-task walking and cognitive task performance was characterized under two sets of instructions as follows: (1) focus on walking and (2) focus on the cognitive task. People with PD and healthy adults walked faster when instructed to focus on walking. However, when focused on walking, people with PD and young adults demonstrated declines in the cognitive task. This suggests that dual-task performance is flexible and can be modified by instructions in people with PD, but walking improvements may come at a cost to cognitive task performance. The ability to modify dual-task performance in response to instructions or other task and environmental factors is critical to mobility in daily life. Future research should continue to examine factors that influence dual-task performance among people with PD.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gait speed (a), response latency (b), and response accuracy (c) for all groups in the single-task (ST; for reference) and both dual-task conditions. Red squares show data for healthy young adults. Orange triangles show data for healthy older adults. Purple circles show data for people with PD. Symbols represent means and bars show standard errors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effects of instructions on walking DTEs (a) and composite cognitive task DTEs (b) for the healthy young adults (red bars), healthy older adults (orange bars), and people with PD (purple bars).

References

    1. Wielinski CL, Erickson-Davis C, Wichmann R, Walde-Douglas M, Parashos SA. Falls and injuries resulting from falls among patients with Parkinson’s disease and other Parkinsonian syndromes. Movement Disorders. 2005;20(4):410–415.
    1. Muslimović D, Post B, Speelman JD, Schmand B, De Haan RJ. Determinants of disability and quality of life in mild to moderate Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2008;70(23):2241–2247.
    1. Post B, Merkus MP, De Haan RJ, Speelman JD. Prognostic factors for the progression of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Movement Disorders. 2007;22(13):1839–1851.
    1. Gray P, Hildebrand K. Fall risk factors in Parkinson’s disease. The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 2000;32(4):222–228.
    1. O’Shea S, Morris ME, Iansek R. Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks. Physical Therapy. 2002;82(9):888–897.
    1. Bond JM, Morn’s M. Goal-directed secondary motor tasks: their effects on gait in subjects with Parkinson disease. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2000;81(1):110–116.
    1. Galletly R, Brauer SG. Does the type of concurrent task affect preferred and cued gait in people with Parkinson’s disease? Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2005;51(3):175–180.
    1. Rochester L, Hetherington V, Jones D, et al. Attending to the task: interference effects of functional tasks on walking in Parkinson’s disease and the roles of cognition, depression, fatigue, and balance. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004;85(10):1578–1585.
    1. Yogev G, Giladi N, Peretz C, Springer S, Simon ES, Hausdorff JM. Dual tasking, gait rhythmicity, and Parkinson’s disease: which aspects of gait are attention demanding? European Journal of Neuroscience. 2005;22(5):1248–1256.
    1. Jones D, Rochester L, Birleson A, et al. Everyday walking with Parkinson’s disease: understanding personal challenges and strategies. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2008;30(16):1213–1221.
    1. Parkinson J. An essay on the shaking palsy. In: Gardner-Thorpe C, editor. James Parkinson, 1755–1824. London, UK: Exeter; 1988.
    1. Behrman AL, Teitelbaum P, Cauraugh JH. Verbal instructional sets to normalise the temporal and spatial gait variables in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 1998;65(4):580–582.
    1. Canning CG. The effect of directing attention during walking under dual-task conditions in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2005;11(2):95–99.
    1. Morris ME, Iansek R, Matyas TA, Summers JJ. Stride length regulation in Parkinson’s disease: normalization strategies and underlying mechanisms. Brain. 1996;119(2):551–568.
    1. Lohnes CA, Earhart GM. The impact of attentional, auditory, and combined cues on walking during single and cognitive dual tasks in Parkinson disease. Gait and Posture. 2011;33(3):478–483.
    1. Kelly VE, Eusterbrock AJ, Shumway-Cook A. A review of dual-task walking deficits in people with Parkinson’s disease: motor and cognitive contributions, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Parkinsons Disease. 2012;2012918719
    1. Bloem BR, Grimbergen YAM, van Dijk JG, Munneke M. The “posture second” strategy: a review of wrong priorities in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2006;248(1-2):196–204.
    1. Dalrymple-Alford JC, MacAskill MR, Nakas CT, et al. The MoCA: well-suited screen for cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2010;75(19):1717–1725.
    1. Siu KC, Chou LS, Mayr U, Van Donkelaar P, Woollacott MH. Does inability to allocate attention contribute to balance constraints during gait in older adults? Journals of Gerontology A. 2008;63(12):1364–1369.
    1. Kelly VE, Janke AA, Shumway-Cook A. Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults. Experimental Brain Research. 2010;207(1-2):65–73.
    1. Brach JS, Berlin JE, VanSwearingen JM, Newman AB, Studenski SA. Too much or too little step width variability is associated with a fall history in older persons who walk at or near normal gait speed. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2005;2, article 21
    1. Lord S, Baker K, Nieuwboer A, Burn D, Rochester L. Gait variability in Parkinson’s disease: an indicator of non-dopaminergic contributors to gait dysfunction? Journal of Neurology. 2011;258(4):566–572.
    1. Chen CJ, Chou LS. Center of mass position relative to the ankle during walking: a clinically feasible detection method for gait imbalance. Gait and Posture. 2010;31(3):391–393.
    1. Sawers A, Hahn ME. Regulation of whole-body frontal plane balance varies within a step during unperturbed walking. Gait and Posture. 2012;36(2):322–324.
    1. Kelly VE, Eusterbrock AJ, Shumway-Cook A. Factors influencing dynamic prioritization during dual-task walking in healthy young adults. Gait and Posture. 2013;37(1):131–134.
    1. Yogev-Seligmann G, Rotem-Galili Y, Mirelman A, Dickstein R, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. How does explicit prioritization alter walking during dual-task performance? Effects of age and sex on gait speed and variability. Physical Therapy. 2010;90(2):177–186.
    1. Siu KC, Woollacott MH. Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources. Gait and Posture. 2007;25(1):121–126.
    1. Richardson JTE. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review. 2011;6(2):135–147.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press; 1988.
    1. Tomlinson CL, Stowe R, Patel S, Rick C, Gray R, Clarke CE. Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders. 2010;25(15):2649–2653.
    1. Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. Do we always prioritize balance when walking? Towards an integrated model of task prioritization. Movement Disorders. 2012;27(6):765–770.
    1. Yogev-Seligmann G, Rotem-Galili Y, Dickstein R, et al. Effects of explicit prioritization on dual task walking in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Gait and Posture. 2012;35(4):641–646.
    1. Bloem BR, Valkenburg VV, Slabbekoorn M, Van Dijk JG. The multiple tasks test. Strategies in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Brain Research. 2001;137(3-4):478–486.
    1. Hollman JH, Childs KB, McNeil ML, Mueller AC, Quilter CM, Youdas JW. Number of strides required for reliable measurements of pace, rhythm and variability parameters of gait during normal and dual task walking in older individuals. Gait and Posture. 2010;32(1):23–28.
    1. Lord S, Howe T, Greenland J, et al. Gait variability in older adults: a structured review of testing protocol and clinimetric properties. Gait and Posture. 2011;34(4):443–450.
    1. Galna B, Lord S, Rochester L. Is gait variability reliable in older adults and Parkinson’s disease? Towards an optimal testing protocol. Gait and Posture. In press.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться