A random spatial sampling method in a rural developing nation

Michelle C Kondo, Kent D W Bream, Frances K Barg, Charles C Branas, Michelle C Kondo, Kent D W Bream, Frances K Barg, Charles C Branas

Abstract

Background: Nonrandom sampling of populations in developing nations has limitations and can inaccurately estimate health phenomena, especially among hard-to-reach populations such as rural residents. However, random sampling of rural populations in developing nations can be challenged by incomplete enumeration of the base population.

Methods: We describe a stratified random sampling method using geographical information system (GIS) software and global positioning system (GPS) technology for application in a health survey in a rural region of Guatemala, as well as a qualitative study of the enumeration process.

Results: This method offers an alternative sampling technique that could reduce opportunities for bias in household selection compared to cluster methods. However, its use is subject to issues surrounding survey preparation, technological limitations and in-the-field household selection. Application of this method in remote areas will raise challenges surrounding the boundary delineation process, use and translation of satellite imagery between GIS and GPS, and household selection at each survey point in varying field conditions. This method favors household selection in denser urban areas and in new residential developments.

Conclusions: Random spatial sampling methodology can be used to survey a random sample of population in a remote region of a developing nation. Although this method should be further validated and compared with more established methods to determine its utility in social survey applications, it shows promise for use in developing nations with resource-challenged environments where detailed geographic and human census data are less available.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cantones and aldeas of Santiago Atitlán, Guatemala. Note: Blue uni-directional hatch represents canton and aldea boundaries. Red hatch represents sampled areas.

References

    1. Levy PS, Lemeshow S. Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. New York: Wiley; 1991.
    1. Bostoen K, Bilukha OO, Fenn B, Morgan OW, Tam CC, Veen A, Checchi F. Methods for health surveys in difficult settings: charting progress, moving forward. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2007;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-4-13.
    1. Siri JG, Lindblade KA, Rosen DH, Onyango B, Vulule JM, Slutsker L, Wilson ML. A census-weighted, spatially-stratified household sampling strategy for urban malaria epidemiology. Malar J. 2008;7:315.
    1. Kolbe AR, Hutson RA. Human rights abuse and other criminal violations in Port-au-Prince, Haiti: a random survey of households. Lancet. 2006;368:864–873. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69211-8.
    1. World Health Organization. Training for Mid-Level Managers: The EPI Coverage Survey. Geneva: WHO Expanded Programme on Immunization; 1991.
    1. Roberts L, Despines M. Mortality in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Lancet. 1999;353:2249–2250.
    1. Grandesso F, Sanderson F, Kruijt J, Koene T, Brown V. Mortality and malnutrition among populations living in South Darfur, Sudan: results of 3 surveys, September 2004. JAMA. 2005;293:1490–1494. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.12.1490.
    1. Grais RF, Rose AMC, Guthmann J-P. Don’t spin the pen: two alternative methods for second-stage sampling in urban cluster surveys. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2007;4:8. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-4-8.
    1. Brogan D, Flagg EW, Deming M, Waldman R. Increasing the accuracy of the expanded programme on immunization’s cluster survey design. Ann Epidemiol. 1994;4:302–311. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90086-8.
    1. Lemeshow S, Tserkovnyi AG, Tulloch JL, Dowd JE, Lwanga SK, Keja J. A computer simulation of the EPI survey strategy. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14:473–481. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.3.473.
    1. Turner AG, Magnani RJ, Shuaib M. A not quite as quick but much cleaner alternative to the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) cluster survey design. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:198–203. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.1.198.
    1. Berry BJ, Baker AM. In: Spatial Analysis. Berry BJ, Marble DF, editor. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1968. Geographic sampling; pp. 91–100.
    1. Caeiro S, Painho M, Goovaerts P, Costa H, Sousa S. Spatial sampling design for sediment quality assessment in estuaries. Environ Model Softw. 2003;18:853–859. doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00103-8.
    1. Williams MS. New approach to areal sampling in ecological surveys. For Ecol Manag. 2001;154:11–22. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00601-0.
    1. Kumar N. Spatial sampling design for a demographic and health survey. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2007;26:581–599. doi: 10.1007/s11113-007-9044-7.
    1. Kondo MC, Rivera R, Rullman S Jr. Protecting the idyll but not the environment: second homes, amenity migration and rural exclusion in Washington State. Landsc Urban Plan. 2012;106:174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.003.
    1. Kolbe AR, Hutson RA, Shannon H, Trzcinski E, Miles B, Levitz N, Puccio M, James L, Noel JR, Muggah R. Mortality, crime and access to basic needs before and after the Haiti earthquake: a random survey of Port-au-Prince households. Med Confl Surviv. 2010;26:281–297. doi: 10.1080/13623699.2010.535279.
    1. Shannon H, Hutson R, Kolbe A, Stringer B, Haines T. Choosing a survey sample when data on the population are limited: a method using global positioning systems and aerial and satellite photographs. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2012;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-9-5.
    1. Bose SK, Bream KDW, Barg FK, Band RA. Willingness to pay for emergency referral transport in a developing setting: a geographically randomized study. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:793–800. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01382.x.
    1. Kaiser R, Spiegel PB, Henderson AK, Gerber ML. The application of geographic information systems and global positioning systems in humanitarian emergencies: lessons learned, programme implications and future research. Disasters. 2003;27:127–140. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00224.
    1. Municipio de Santiago Atitlán. Plan de Desarrollo Municipal, Municipio de Santiago Atitlán. 2010.
    1. Nagata JM, Valeggia CR, Barg FK, Bream KDW. Body mass index, socio-economic status and socio-behavioral practices among Tz’utujil Maya women. Econ Hum Biol. 2009;7:96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2009.02.002.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться