Secondhand tobacco smoke: an occupational hazard for smoking and non-smoking bar and nightclub employees
Miranda R Jones, Heather Wipfli, Shahida Shahrir, Erika Avila-Tang, Jonathan M Samet, Patrick N Breysse, Ana Navas-Acien, FAMRI Bar Study Investigators, Wifred Agbenyikey, Mira B Aghi, Mitali Chakrabarty, Marta Angueira, George Bakhturidze, Carmen Barco, Joaquin Barnoya, Marcia Bassier-Paltoo, Jamil H Chowdhury, Rita Damayanti, Beatriz Goja, Nipapun Kungskulniti, Punyarat Lapvongwatana, Vladimir Levshin, Chimedsuren Ochir, Oluwakemi Odukoya, Zheng Pin-Pin, Krzysztof Przewozniak, Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu, Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez, Rachel Rowena Garcia, Lia Losonczy, Arayik Sargsyan, Dao Thanh Huyen, Denis Vinnikov, Kyryll Zhyvotovskyy, Miranda R Jones, Heather Wipfli, Shahida Shahrir, Erika Avila-Tang, Jonathan M Samet, Patrick N Breysse, Ana Navas-Acien, FAMRI Bar Study Investigators, Wifred Agbenyikey, Mira B Aghi, Mitali Chakrabarty, Marta Angueira, George Bakhturidze, Carmen Barco, Joaquin Barnoya, Marcia Bassier-Paltoo, Jamil H Chowdhury, Rita Damayanti, Beatriz Goja, Nipapun Kungskulniti, Punyarat Lapvongwatana, Vladimir Levshin, Chimedsuren Ochir, Oluwakemi Odukoya, Zheng Pin-Pin, Krzysztof Przewozniak, Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu, Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez, Rachel Rowena Garcia, Lia Losonczy, Arayik Sargsyan, Dao Thanh Huyen, Denis Vinnikov, Kyryll Zhyvotovskyy
Abstract
Background: In the absence of comprehensive smoking bans in public places, bars and nightclubs have the highest concentrations of secondhand tobacco smoke, posing a serious health risk for workers in these venues.
Objective: To assess exposure of bar and nightclub employees to secondhand smoke, including non-smoking and smoking employees.
Methods: Between 2007 and 2009, the authors recruited approximately 10 venues per city and up to five employees per venue in 24 cities in the Americas, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. Air nicotine concentrations were measured for 7 days in 238 venues. To evaluate personal exposure to secondhand smoke, hair nicotine concentrations were also measured for 625 non-smoking and 311 smoking employees (N=936).
Results: Median (IQR) air nicotine concentrations were 3.5 (1.5-8.5) μg/m(3) and 0.2 (0.1-0.7) μg/m(3) in smoking and smoke-free venues, respectively. Median (IQR) hair nicotine concentrations were 6.0 (1.6-16.0) ng/mg and 1.7 (0.5-5.5) ng/mg in smoking and non-smoking employees, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, education, living with a smoker, hair treatment and region, a twofold increase in air nicotine concentrations was associated with a 30% (95% CI 23% to 38%) increase in hair nicotine concentrations in non-smoking employees and with a 10% (2% to 19%) increase in smoking employees.
Conclusions: Occupational exposure to secondhand smoke, assessed by air nicotine, resulted in elevated concentrations of hair nicotine among non-smoking and smoking bar and nightclub employees. The high levels of airborne nicotine found in bars and nightclubs and the contribution of this exposure to employee hair nicotine concentrations support the need for legislation measures that ensure complete protection from secondhand smoke in these venues.
Keywords: Nicotine; cotinine; environmental tobacco smoke; global health; harm reduction; human rights; litigation; low/middle-income country; national capacity building; prevalence; secondhand smoke; smoking-caused disease; surveillance and monitoring; tobacco smoke pollution; workplace.
Figures
Source: PubMed