Closed-loop neuromuscular electrical stimulation using feedforward-feedback control and textile electrodes to regulate grasp force in quadriplegia

John Ciancibello, Kevin King, Milad Alizadeh Meghrazi, Subash Padmanaban, Todd Levy, Richard Ramdeo, Malgorzata Straka, Chad Bouton, John Ciancibello, Kevin King, Milad Alizadeh Meghrazi, Subash Padmanaban, Todd Levy, Richard Ramdeo, Malgorzata Straka, Chad Bouton

Abstract

Background: Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation is routinely used in physical rehabilitation and more recently in brain-computer interface applications for restoring movement in paralyzed limbs. Due to variable muscle responses to repeated or sustained stimulation, grasp force levels can change significantly over time. Here we develop and assess closed-loop methods to regulate individual finger forces to facilitate functional movement. We combined this approach with custom textile-based electrodes to form a light-weight, wearable device and evaluated in paralyzed study participants.

Methods: A textile-based electrode sleeve was developed by the study team and Myant, Corp. (Toronto, ON, Canada) and evaluated in a study involving three able-body participants and two participants with quadriplegia. A feedforward-feedback control structure was designed and implemented to accurately maintain finger force levels in a quadriplegic study participant.

Results: Individual finger flexion and extension movements, along with functional grasping, were evoked during neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Closed-loop control methods allowed accurate steady state performance (< 15% error) with a settling time of 0.67 s (SD = 0.42 s) for individual finger contact force in a participant with quadriplegia.

Conclusions: Textile-based electrodes were identified to be a feasible alternative to conventional electrodes and facilitated individual finger movement and functional grasping. Furthermore, closed-loop methods demonstrated accurate control of individual finger flexion force. This approach may be a viable solution for enabling grasp force regulation in quadriplegia.

Trial registration: NCT, NCT03385005. Registered Dec. 28, 2017.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsCEB holds various patents in the bioelectronic medicine field and is a shareholder in Sanguistat, a company focused on bleeding reduction/suppression, and is a founder and shareholder of Neuvotion, LLC, a company focused on movement restoration in paralysis, related to the reviewed work.

© The Author(s) 2019.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The sleeve is comprised of a nylon base material and silver thread forming circular electrode sites (128) that cover the forearm and facilitate stimulation of flexor and extensor muscles to produce a wide variety of wrist and hand movements
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The feedforward-feedback control architecture included a feedforward block (fi) which uses the desired force (Fdesired) as an input to produce a computed current output. The output of the feedforward block is added to the feedback controller output and this sum is provided to the Alpha Omega Stimulator as the command input. The feedback controller is a proportional-integral (PI) type, providing current commands to the Alpha Omega stimulator
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Textile-based electrodes in sleeve form. (a) Natural hand position when stimulation is off (b) Stimulation turned on, evoking index finger flexion and pinch-type movement (subject NMES05). (c) and (d) Stimulation evoked a cylindrical grasp with sufficient force to hold a full (750 mL) water bottle against gravity in two study participants with quadriplegia (NMES04 and NMES05 respectively)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Open and closed-loop responses during neuromuscular stimulation. a Force produced for various stimulation amplitudes and linear fit (blue). b and c Example open-loop responses to neuromuscular electrical stimulation. d Representative closed-loop response to a desired force step input; between 8 and 10s the controller automatically increases the current delivered to the target muscle to compensate for muscle fatigue
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Closed-loop response to increasing and decreasing target (desired) forces. a The target force is increased from 2.5 to 5 N causing a rapid response that overshoots the final desired value, but settles within +/− 10% of the final value in less than 1 s. b The target force is decreased from 5 to 2.5 N associated with a rapid response, settling within 1 s

References

    1. Ajiboye AB, Willett FR, Young DR, Memberg WD, Murphy BA, Miller JP, et al. Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Lancet. 2017. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30601-3.
    1. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004. 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371.
    1. Annetta NV, Friend J, Schimmoeller A, Buck VS, Friedenberg DA, Bouton CE, et al. A high definition noninvasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation system for cortical control of combinatorial rotary hand movements in a human with tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019;66(4). 10.1109/TBME.2018.2864104.
    1. Armour BS, Courtney-Long EA, Fox MH, Fredine H, Cahill A. Prevalence and causes of paralysis - United States, 2013. Am J Public Health. 2016. 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303270.
    1. Bao X, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Zhang J, Lü X, Wang Z. Electrode placement on the forearm for selective stimulation of finger extension/flexion. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190936.
    1. Bouton CE, Shaikhouni A, Annetta NV, Bockbrader MA, Friedenberg DA, Nielson DM, et al. Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia. Nature. 2016;533. 10.1038/nature17435.
    1. Cooper G, Barker AT, Heller BW, Good T, Kenney LPJ, Howard D. The use of hydrogel as an electrode-skin interface for electrode array FES applications. Med Eng Phys. 2011. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.03.008.
    1. Cornwall R, Hausman MR. Implanted neuroprostheses for restoration of hand function in tetraplegic patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004. 10.5435/00124635-200403000-00002.
    1. Crago PE, Nakai RJ, Chizeck HJ. Feedback regulation of hand grasp opening and contact force during stimulation of paralyzed muscle. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991. 10.1109/10.68205.
    1. Frankel MA, Mathews VJ, Clark GA, Normann RA, Meek SG. Control of dynamic limb motion using fatigue-resistant asynchronous intrafascicular multi-electrode stimulation. Front Neurosci. 2016. 10.3389/fnins.2016.00414.
    1. Friedenberg DA, Schwemmer MA, Landgraf AJ, Annetta NV, Bockbrader MA, Bouton CE, et al. Neuroprosthetic-enabled control of graded arm muscle contraction in a paralyzed human. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1). 10.1038/s41598-017-08120-9.
    1. Ho JS, Yeh AJ, Neofytou E, Kim S, Tanabe Y, Patlolla B, et al. Wireless power transfer to deep-tissue microimplants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. 10.1073/pnas.1403002111.
    1. Huerta PT, Volpe BT. Transcranial magnetic stimulation, synaptic plasticity and network oscillations. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2009. 10.1186/1743-0003-6-7.
    1. Lemay MA, Crago PE, Katorgi M, Chapman GJ. Automated tuning of a closed-loop hand grasp Neuroprosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993. 10.1109/10.237697.
    1. Seo D, Neely RM, Shen K, Singhal U, Alon E, Rabaey JM, et al. Wireless recording in the peripheral nervous system with ultrasonic neural dust. Neuron. 2016. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.034.
    1. Sharma G, Friedenberg DA, Annetta N, Glenn B, Bockbrader M, Majstorovic C, et al. Using an artificial neural bypass to restore cortical control of rhythmic movements in a human with quadriplegia. Sci Rep. 2016;6. 10.1038/srep33807.
    1. Sheffler LR, Chae J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. 2007. 10.1002/mus.20758.
    1. Troyk PR, Brown IE, Moore WH, Loeb GE. Development of BION/spl trade/ technology for functional electrical stimulation: bidirectional telemetry. 2005.
    1. Yoshida K, Horch K. Closed-loop control of ankle position using muscle afferent feedback with functional neuromuscular stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996. 10.1109/10.481986.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться