Acceptability of conditions in a community-led cash transfer programme for orphaned and vulnerable children in Zimbabwe

Morten Skovdal, Laura Robertson, Phyllis Mushati, Lovemore Dumba, Lorraine Sherr, Constance Nyamukapa, Simon Gregson, Morten Skovdal, Laura Robertson, Phyllis Mushati, Lovemore Dumba, Lorraine Sherr, Constance Nyamukapa, Simon Gregson

Abstract

Evidence suggests that a regular and reliable transfer of cash to households with orphaned and vulnerable children has a strong and positive effect on child outcomes. However, conditional cash transfers are considered by some as particularly intrusive and the question on whether or not to apply conditions to cash transfers is an issue of controversy. Contributing to policy debates on the appropriateness of conditions, this article sets out to investigate the overall buy-in of conditions by different stakeholders and to identify pathways that contribute to an acceptability of conditions. The article draws on data from a cluster-randomized trial of a community-led cash transfer programme in Manicaland, eastern Zimbabwe. An endpoint survey distributed to 5167 households assessed community members' acceptance of conditions and 35 in-depth interviews and 3 focus groups with a total of 58 adults and 4 youth examined local perceptions of conditions. The study found a significant and widespread acceptance of conditions primarily because they were seen as fair and a proxy for good parenting or guardianship. In a socio-economic context where child grants are not considered a citizen entitlement, community members and cash transfer recipients valued the conditions associated with these grants. The community members interpreted the fulfilment of the conditions as a proxy for achievement and merit, enabling them to participate rather than sit back as passive recipients of aid. Although conditions have a paternalistic undertone and engender the sceptics' view of conditions being pernicious and even abominable, it is important to recognize that community members, when given the opportunity to participate in programme design and implementation, can take advantage of conditions and appropriate them in a way that helps them manage change and overcome the social divisiveness or conflict that otherwise may arise when some people are identified to benefit and others not.

Keywords: Cash transfers; community acceptability; conditions; orphaned children; social protection.

Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2013.

References

    1. Adato M, Bassett L. Social protection to support vulnerable children and families: the potential of cash transfers to protect education, health and nutrition. AIDS Care. 2009;21(suppl. 1):60–75.
    1. Akresh R, de Walque D, Kazianga H. Cash Transfers and Child Schooling: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation of the Role of Conditionality. 2013. Impact Evaluation Series No. 82. Washington: World Bank.
    1. Arnold C, Conway T, Greenslade M. Cash Transfers Evidence Paper. London: Department for International Development; 2011.
    1. Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research. 2001;1:385–405.
    1. Baird S, McIntosh C, Özler B. Cash or condition? Evidence from a cash transfer experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2011;126:1709–53.
    1. Barber SL, Gertler PJ. Empowering women: how Mexico's conditional cash transfer programme raised prenatal care quality and birth weight. Journal of Development Effectiveness. 2010;2:51–73.
    1. Campbell C, Skovdal M, Mupambireyi Z, Gregson S. Exploring children's stigmatisation of AIDS-affected children in Zimbabwe through drawings and stories. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] Social Science and Medicine. 2010;71:975–85.
    1. DD, CRS. The Feasibility Study for a Pilot Cash Transfer (CT) Project. Harare: Development Data (DD) and Catholic Relief Services (CRS); 2007.
    1. Devereux S, Marshall J, MacAskill J, Pelham L. Making Cash Count—Lessons from Cash Transfer Schemes in East and Southern Africa for Support the Most Vulnerable Children and Households. Save the Children UK: HelpAge International and Institute of Development Studies; 2005. , accessed 15 April 2013.
    1. Egbo B. Gender, Literacy, and Life Chances in Sub-Saharan Africa. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd; 2000.
    1. Ellis F. ‘We Are All Poor Here’: economic difference, social divisiveness and targeting cash transfers in sub-saharan Africa. Journal of Development Studies. 2012;48:201–14.
    1. Forde I, Bell R, Marmot MG. Using conditionality as a solution to the problem of low uptake of essential services among disadvantaged communities: a social determinants view. American Journal of Public Health. 2011;101:1365–9.
    1. Freeland N. Superfluous, pernicious, atrocious and abominable? The case against conditional cash transfers. IDS Bulletin. 2007;38:75–8.
    1. Gaarder M. Conditional versus unconditional cash: a commentary. Journal of Development Effectiveness. 2012;4:130–3.
    1. Gregson S, Gonese E, Hallett TB, et al. HIV decline in Zimbabwe due to reductions in risky sex? Evidence from a comprehensive epidemiological review. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2010;39:1311–23.
    1. Halperin DT, Mugurungi O, Hallett TB, et al. A surprising prevention success: why did the HIV epidemic decline in Zimbabwe? PLoS Medicine. 2011;8:e1000414.
    1. Handa S, Davis B. The experience of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean. Development Policy Review. 2006;24:513–36.
    1. Lagarde M, Haines A, Palmer N. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009. The impact of conditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in low and middle income countries. CD008137. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008137.
    1. MacAuslan I, Riemenschneider N. Richer but resented: what do cash transfers do to social relations? IDS Bulletin. 2011;42:60–6.
    1. Nyamukapa CA, Gregson S, Wambe M, et al. Causes and consequences of psychological distress among orphans in eastern Zimbabwe. AIDS Care: Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV. 2010;22:988–96.
    1. Robertson L, Mushati P, Eaton J, et al. Household-based cash transfer targeting strategies in Zimbabwe: are we reaching the most vulnerable children? Social Science and Medicine. 2012;75:2503–8.
    1. Robertson L, Mushati P, Eaton J, et al. Effects of unconditional and conditional cash transfers on child health and development in Zimbabwe: a cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet. 2013;381:1283–92.
    1. Saucedo Delgado OA. The gendered reading of conditionality in antipoverty programmes: unintended effects on Mexican rural households' interactions with public health institutions. Bulletin of Latin American Research. 2013;32:61–77.
    1. Schubert B, Slater R. Social cash transfers in low-income African countries: conditional or unconditional? Development Policy Review. 2006;24:571–8.
    1. Schüring E. Conditions, Conditionality, Conditionalities, Responsibilities—Finding Common Ground. Maastricht: Maastricht University (Maastricht Graduate School of Governance); 2010.
    1. Scott J, Marshall G. A Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. Skovdal M, Mushati P, Robertson L, et al. Social acceptability and perceived impact of a community-led cash transfer programme in Zimbabwe. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:342.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться