Improvements in clinical response between 12 and 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on etanercept therapy with or without methotrexate

A Kavanaugh, L Klareskog, D van der Heijde, J Li, B Freundlich, M Hooper, A Kavanaugh, L Klareskog, D van der Heijde, J Li, B Freundlich, M Hooper

Abstract

Background: Whereas many patients respond quickly to treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, some patients may experience significant but delayed responses.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical response between 12 and 24 weeks in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis from the Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes.

Methods: Clinical response was assessed at 24 weeks in 12-week non-responders, according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria. The proportion of subjects who successfully maintained response to 52 weeks was analysed, as were radiographic outcomes.

Results: Data from 682 subjects were included in the analysis. Non and partial responders in all three groups (etanercept, methotrexate and etanercept plus methotrexate) at week 12 showed an improvement in responses at week 24. Over 80% of the week 24 ACR20/50/70 responders in the etanercept plus methotrexate arm sustained their response to 52 weeks. In the etanercept arms, a delayed clinical response was not associated with increased radiographic progression at week 52.

Conclusion: A significant proportion of non and partial responders to etanercept with or without methotrexate therapy at week 12 achieved a good clinical response or improved their overall clinical response at week 24. Discontinuing TNF inhibitor therapy at 12 weeks may be premature in some rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AK has conducted clinical studies funded by Amgen. LK has received research grants and/or served on advisory committees for the following companies: Wyeth, Schering–Plough; Abbott, Roche, Bristol Meyers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Amgen and Centocor. DvdH is a consultant and/or has received research grants from the following companies: Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Merck, Wyeth, UCB and Roche. BF is a full-time employee of Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. JL and MH are full-time employees of Amgen Inc.

Figures

Figure 1. Improvement and sustainability of American…
Figure 1. Improvement and sustainability of American College of Rheumatology response. ACR, American College of Rheumatology; ETN, etanercept; MTX, methotrexate; N, total of subgroup; NR, non-responder; R, responder.
Figure 2. Mean DAS28 scores in EULAR…
Figure 2. Mean DAS28 scores in EULAR (moderate or good) responders and non-responders. DAS28, Disease Activity Score using 28 joints; ETN, etanercept; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; MTX, methotrexate; N, total of subgroup; NR, non-responder; R, responder.

References

    1. Klareskog L, van der Heijde D, de Jager JP, et al. Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:675–81
    1. Van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Rodriguez-Valverde V, et al. Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:1063–74
    1. Bathon JM, Martin RW, Fleischmann RM, et al. A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1586–93
    1. Weinblatt ME, Kremer JM, Bankhurst AD, et al. A trial of etanercept, a recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor:Fc fusion protein, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate. N Engl J Med 1999;340:253–9
    1. Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, et al. Disconnect between inflammation and joint destruction after treatment with etanercept plus methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3119–25
    1. Smolen JS, Han C, Bala M, et al. Evidence of radiographic benefit of treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had no clinical improvement: a detailed subanalysis of data from the Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis With Concomitant Therapy study. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1020–30
    1. Emery P, Reginster J-Y, Appelboom T, et al. WHO Collaborating Centre consensus meeting on anti-cytokine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2001;40:699–702
    1. Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, et al. Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2006. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65Suppl:iii2–15
    1. Konttinen YT, Seitsalo S, Lehto M, Santavirta S. Current management: management of rheumatic diseases in the ra of biological anti-rheumatic drugs. Acta Orthop 2005;76:614–19
    1. Ledingham J, Deighton C. Update on the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for prescribing TNFalpha blockers in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (update of previous guidelines of April 2001). Rheumatology 2005;44:157–63
    1. Mok C-C. Consensus statements on the indications and monitoring of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for rheumatic diseases in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Bull Rheum Dis 2005;5:19–25
    1. Rodriguez-Valverde V, Caliz RC, Alvaro Alvaro-Gracia JM, et al. III Actualizacion del consenso de la Sociedad Espanola de Reumatologia sobre terapia biologica en la artritis reumatoide. Reumatol Clin 2006;2Supl 2:S52–9
    1. Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, et al. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2793–806
    1. Genovese MC, Becker J-C, Schiff M, et al. Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1114–23
    1. Iannone F, Trotta F, Monteccuco C, et al. Etanercept maintains the clinical benefit achieved by infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who discontinued infliximab because of side effects. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:249–52

Source: PubMed

Подписаться