Comparison of relative oxycodone consumption in surgical pleth index-guided analgesia versus conventional analgesia during sevoflurane anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial

Young Ju Won, Byung Gun Lim, So Hyun Lee, Sangwoo Park, Heezoo Kim, Il Ok Lee, Myoung Hoon Kong, Young Ju Won, Byung Gun Lim, So Hyun Lee, Sangwoo Park, Heezoo Kim, Il Ok Lee, Myoung Hoon Kong

Abstract

Background: The surgical pleth index (SPI) is proposed for titration of analgesic drugs during general anesthesia. Several reports have investigated the effect of SPI on the consumption of opioids including remifentanil, fentanyl, and sufentanil during anesthesia, but there are no reports about oxycodone. We aimed to investigate intravenous oxycodone consumption between SPI-guided analgesia and conventional analgesia practices during sevoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

Methods: Forty-five patients undergoing elective thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to an SPI group (SPI-guided analgesia group, n = 23) or a control group (conventional analgesia group, n = 22). Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane to achieve bispectral index values between 40 and 60. In the SPI group, oxycodone 1 mg was administered intravenously at SPI values over 50; in the control group, oxycodone 1 mg was administered intravenously at the occurrence of tachycardia or hypertension event. Intraoperative oxycodone consumption and extubation time were recorded. The number of hemodynamic and somatic movement events was recorded, as were postoperative pain and recovery scores.

Results: Patients' characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperative oxycodone consumption in the SPI group was significantly lower than the control group (3.5 ± 2.4 vs 5.1 ± 2.4 mg; P = 0.012). Extubation time was significantly shorter in the SPI group (10.6 ± 3.5 vs 13.4 ± 4.6 min; P = 0.026). Hemodynamic and somatic movement events during anesthesia were comparable between the groups, as were numeric rating scales for pain and modified Aldrete scores at postanesthesia care unit.

Conclusions: SPI-guided analgesia reduces intravenous oxycodone consumption and extubation time compared with conventional analgesia based on clinical parameters during sevoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A flowchart describing patient recruitment, randomization, and withdrawal. Initially, 48 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups as follows: the surgical pleth index-guided analgesia group (SPI group) or the conventional analgesia group (control group). Finally, 45 patients (23 in the SPI group and 22 in the control group) completed this study. SPI = surgical pleth index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change of bispectral index (BIS) (A), surgical pleth index (SPI) values (B), and end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations (C) at major time points during general anesthesia in each group. The graphs show mean values ± standard deviation of each variable for every time points during general anesthesia. All data were collected at baseline, 1 minute after intubation (Intu+1 min), 5 minute after intubation (Intu+5 min), incision, 5 minute after incision (incision+5 min), 10 minute after incision (incision+10 min), 20 minute after incision (incision+20 min), 30 minute after incision (incision+30 min), 60 minute after incision (incision+60 min), end of surgery, and extubation. BIS values were well maintained between 40 and 60 during the surgery in both groups. For the SPI value and end-tidal sevoflurane concentration, there were no significant differences between the groups. SPI group: the surgical pleth index-guided analgesia group; control group: the conventional analgesia group. BIS = bispectral index, SPI = surgical pleth index.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change of numeric rating scale (NRS) scores (A) and modified Aldrete scores (B) at postanesthesia care unit (PACU) in each group. The graphs show mean values ± standard deviation of each variable for every time points. For each score, there were no significant differences between the groups. SPI group: the surgical pleth index-guided analgesia group, control group: the conventional analgesia group. NRS = numeric rating scale, PACU = postanesthesia care unit, SPI = surgical pleth index.

References

    1. Gruenewald M, Ilies C. Monitoring the nociception-anti-nociception balance. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2013; 27:235–247.
    1. Hamunen K, Kontinen V, Hakala E, et al. Effect of pain on autonomic nervous system indices derived from photoplethysmography in healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:838–844.
    1. Huiku M, Uutela K, van Gils M, et al. Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:447–455.
    1. Thee C, Ilies C, Gruenewald M, et al. Reliability of the surgical pleth index for assessment of postoperative pain: a pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32:44–48.
    1. Chen X, Thee C, Gruenewald M, et al. Comparison of surgical stress index-guided analgesia with standard clinical practice during routine general anesthesia: a pilot study. Anesthesiology 2010; 112:1175–1183.
    1. Bergmann I, Gohner A, Crozier TA, et al. Surgical pleth index-guided remifentanil administration reduces remifentanil and propofol consumption and shortens recovery times in outpatient anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110:622–628.
    1. Struys MM, Vanpeteghem C, Huiku M, et al. Changes in a surgical stress index in response to standardized pain stimuli during propofol-remifentanil infusion. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:359–367.
    1. Gruenewald M, Willms S, Broch O, et al. Sufentanil administration guided by surgical pleth index vs standard practice during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomized controlled pilot study. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112:898–905.
    1. Koch S, Ahlburg P, Spangsberg N, et al. Oxycodone vs. fentanyl in the treatment of early post-operative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised double-blind study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52:845–850.
    1. Wennervirta J, Hynynen M, Koivusalo AM, et al. Surgical stress index as a measure of nociception/antinociception balance during general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52:1038–1045.
    1. Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Ilies C, et al. Influence of different remifentanil concentrations on the performance of the surgical stress index to detect a standardized painful stimulus during sevoflurane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:586–593.
    1. Colombo R, Raimondi F, Corona A, et al. Comparison of the surgical pleth index with autonomic nervous system modulation on cardiac activity during general anaesthesia: a randomised cross-over study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31:76–84.
    1. Ledowski T, Ang B, Schmarbeck T, et al. Monitoring of sympathetic tone to assess postoperative pain: skin conductance vs surgical stress index. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:727–731.
    1. Park JH, Lim BG, Kim H, et al. Comparison of surgical pleth index-guided analgesia with conventional analgesia practices in children: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2015; 122:1280–1287.
    1. Colombo R, Raimondi F, Rech R, et al. Surgical pleth index guided analgesia blunts the intraoperative sympathetic response to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minerva Anestesiol 2015; 81:837–845.
    1. Remy C, Marret E, Bonnet F. Effects of acetaminophen on morphine side-effects and consumption after major surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:505–513.
    1. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78:606–617.
    1. Chen X, Thee C, Gruenewald M, et al. Correlation of surgical pleth index with stress hormones during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Sci World J 2012; 2012:879158.
    1. Magee LA, Namouz-Haddad S, Cao V, et al. Labetalol for hypertension in pregnancy. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2015; 14:453–461.
    1. Ahonen J, Jokela R, Uutela K, et al. Surgical stress index reflects surgical stress in gynaecological laparoscopic day-case surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:456–461.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться