Defining the Location of the Adductor Canal Using Ultrasound

Wan Yi Wong, Siska Bjørn, Jennie Maria Christin Strid, Jens Børglum, Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen, Wan Yi Wong, Siska Bjørn, Jennie Maria Christin Strid, Jens Børglum, Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen

Abstract

Background and objectives: The precise location of the adductor canal remains controversial among anesthesiologists. In numerous studies of the analgesic effect of the so-called adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty, the needle insertion point has been the midpoint of the thigh, determined as the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and base of patella. "Adductor canal block" may be a misnomer for an approach that is actually an injection into the femoral triangle, a "femoral triangle block." This block probably has a different analgesic effect compared with an injection into the adductor canal. We sought to determine the exact location of the adductor canal using ultrasound and relate it to the midpoint of the thigh.

Methods: Twenty-two volunteers were examined using ultrasound. The proximal end of the adductor canal was identified where the medial border of the sartorius muscle intersects the medial border of the adductor longus muscle. The distal end of the adductor canal is the adductor hiatus, which was also visualized ultrasonographically.

Results: The mean distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the midpoint of the thigh was 22.9 cm (range, 20.3-24.9 cm). The mean distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the proximal end of the adductor canal was 27.4 cm (range, 24.0-31.4 cm). Consequently, the mean distance from the midpoint of the thigh to the proximal end of the adductor canal was 4.6 cm (range, 2.3-7.0 cm).

Conclusions: In all volunteers, the midpoint of the thigh was proximal to the beginning of the adductor canal, suggesting that an injection performed at this level is in fact a femoral triangle block.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The first row shows three ultrasound images at different levels. The second row shows the identical ultrasound images with color markings. A1 and A2 are at the level of the femoral triangle (FT) corresponding to the red arrows in Figure 2. B1 and B2 depict the beginning of the AC defined as the apex of the FT, where the medial border of the sartorius muscle intersects the medial border of the adductor longus muscle (white arrow in B2). This level corresponds to the blue arrows in Figure 2. C1 and C2 depict the distal end of the AC corresponding to the green arrows in Figure 2. AL (purple), adductor longus muscle; AM (orange), adductor magnus muscle; asterisk (blue), femoral vein; asterisk (red), femoral artery; F, femur; S (green), sartorius muscle; SM (yellow), semimembranosus muscle; VM (blue), vastus medialis muscle.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The figure shows the thighs of 4 volunteers. The midpoint of the thigh (red arrow) is defined as half the distance between the ASIS (pink asterisk) and the base of patella (orange stippled line) corresponding to the ultrasound images in Figure 1A. The proximal end of the AC (blue arrow) is defined by the intersection of the medial border of the sartorius muscle (yellow stippled line) and the medial border of the adductor longus muscle (cyan stippled line) corresponding to the ultrasound images in Figure 1B. The distal end of the AC is defined as the adductor hiatus (green arrow) corresponding to the ultrasound images in Figure 1C.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The figure shows the ultrasonographic visualization of the adductor canal with the characteristic double contour of the VAM (cyan arrows). AM, adductor magnus muscle; femoral artery (red asterisk); S, sartorius muscle; VM, vastus medialis muscle.

References

    1. Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Pedersen EM, Børglum J. Defining adductor canal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39:253–254.
    1. Jaeger P, Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Brøndum V, Dahl JB. Reply to Dr Bendtsen. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39:254–255.
    1. Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Børglum J. Basic topography of the saphenous nerve in the femoral triangle and the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:391–392.
    1. Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Børglum J. The optimal analgesic block for total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:711–719.
    1. Jæger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:409–415.
    1. Jæger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:526–532.
    1. Sørensen JK, Jæger P, Dahl JB, Gottschau B, Stephensen SL, Grevstad U. The isolated effect of adductor canal block on quadriceps femoris muscle strength after total knee arthroplasty: a triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with individual patient analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:553–558.
    1. Manickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VW, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:578–580.
    1. Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Sørensen AM, Dahl JB. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery: preliminary results. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:14–19.
    1. Jenstrup MT, Jæger P, Lund J, et al. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:357–364.
    1. Andersen HL, Gyrn J, Møller L, Christensen B, Zaric D. Continuous saphenous nerve block as supplement to single-dose local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:106–111.
    1. Cunningham DJ, Robinson A. Cunningham's Text-book of Anatomy. Edinburgh: Henry Frowde; 1915.
    1. Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Apaydin N, Oakes WJ, Salter EG. Anatomy and potential clinical significance of the vastoadductor membrane. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29:569–573.
    1. Agur AMR, Dalley AF. Grant's Atlas of Anatomy. 12th ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009; 383.
    1. Standring S. Gray's Anatomy. 39th ed Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005:1470.
    1. Andersen HL, Zaric D. Adductor canal block or midthigh saphenous nerve block: same same but different name! Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39:256–257.
    1. Özer H, Tekdemir I, Elhan A, Turanli S, Engebretsen L. A clinical case and anatomical study of the innervation supply of the vastus medialis muscle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12:119–122.
    1. Burckett-St Laurant D, Peng P, Giron Arango L, et al. The nerves of the adductor canal and the innervation of the knee: an anatomic study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:321–327.
    1. Kennedy JC, Alexander IJ, Hayes KC. Nerve supply of the human knee and its functional importance. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:329–335.
    1. Anagnostopoulou S, Anagnostis G, Saranteas T, Mavrogenis AF, Paraskeuopoulos T. Saphenous and infrapatellar nerves at the adductor canal: anatomy and implications in regional anesthesia. Orthopedics. 2016;39:e259–e262.
    1. Goffin P, Lecoq JP, Ninane V, et al. Interfascial spread of injectate after adductor canal injection in fresh human cadavers. Anesth Analg. 2016;123:501–503.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться