A 6-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, clinical safety study of lumiracoxib and rofecoxib in osteoarthritis patients

Kirstin Stricker, Sue Yu, Gerhard Krammer, Kirstin Stricker, Sue Yu, Gerhard Krammer

Abstract

Background: Lumiracoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) with a superior gastrointestinal (GI) safety profile as compared to traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, ibuprofen and naproxen). This safety study compared the GI tolerability, the blood pressure (BP) profile and the incidence of oedema with lumiracoxib and rofecoxib in the treatment of OA. Rofecoxib was withdrawn worldwide due to an associated increased risk of CV events and lumiracoxib has been withdrawn from Australia, Canada, Europe and a few other countries following reports of suspected adverse liver reactions.

Methods: This randomised, double-blind study enrolled 309 patients (aged greater than or equal to 50 years) with primary OA across 51 centres in Europe. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either lumiracoxib 400 mg od (four times the recommended dose in OA) (n = 154) or rofecoxib 25 mg od (n = 155). The study was conducted for 6 weeks and assessments were performed at Weeks 3 and 6. The primary safety measures were the incidence of predefined GI adverse events (AEs) and peripheral oedema. The secondary safety measures included effect of treatment on the mean sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (msSBP and msDBP). Tolerability of lumiracoxib 400 mg was assessed by the incidence of AEs.

Results: Lumiracoxib and rofecoxib displayed similar GI safety profiles with no statistically significant difference in predefined GI AEs between the two groups (43.5% vs. 37.4%, respectively). The incidence and severity of individual predefined GI AEs was comparable between the two groups. The incidence of peripheral oedema was low and identical in both the groups (n = 9, 5.8%). Only one patient in the lumiracoxib group and three patients in the rofecoxib group had a moderate or severe event. At Week 6 there was a significantly lower msSBP and msDBP in the lumiracoxib group compared to the rofecoxib group (p < 0.05). A similar percentage of patients in both groups showed an improvement in target joint pain and disease activity. The tolerability profile was similar in both the treatment groups.

Conclusion: Lumiracoxib 400 mg od (four times the recommended dose in OA) provided a comparable GI safety profile to rofecoxib 25 mg od (therapeutic dose). However, lumiracoxib was associated with a significantly better BP profile as compared to rofecoxib.

Trial registration number: NCT00637949.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow diagram. †Patients with multiple occurrences of a major protocol violation (PV) were counted only once in that category of PV.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence of peripheral oedema in patients treated with lumiracoxib and rofecoxib (safety population). The incidence of peripheral oedema at Week 6. Pairwise comparisons tested at the two-sided 5% significance level. p-value computed using Fisher's exact test. OA, osteoarthritis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lumiracoxib shows better blood pressure profile as compared to rofecoxib (safety population). msSBP – Mean sitting systolic blood pressure. msDBP – Mean sitting diastolic blood pressure. p-value computed from ANCOVA on mean blood pressure at Day 42 with centre, treatment, and baseline blood pressure value. Mean change from baseline at Week 6. OA, osteoarthritis.

References

    1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:646–656.
    1. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:1905–1915. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200009)43:9<1905::AID-ANR1>;2-P.
    1. Laine L. Approaches to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in the high-risk patient. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:594–606. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.21907.
    1. Wolfe MM. NSAIDs and the gastrointestinal mucosa. Hosp Pract (Minneap) 1996;31:37–44.
    1. Talley N, Evans J, Fleming K, Harmsen W, Zinmeister A, Melton L., III Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and dyspepsia in the elderly. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:1345–1350. doi: 10.1007/BF02065549.
    1. Laine L. The gastrointestinal effects of nonselective NSAIDs and COX-2-selective inhibitors. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002;32:25–32. doi: 10.1053/sarh.2002.37217.
    1. Singh G, Ramey DR, Morfeld D, Shi H, Hatoum HT, Fries JF. Gastrointestinal tract complications of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective observational cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1530–1536. doi: 10.1001/archinte.156.14.1530.
    1. Singh G, Triadafilopoulos G. Epidemiology of NSAID induced gastrointestinal complications. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1999;56:18–24.
    1. Goldstein JL, Correa P, Zhao WW, Burr AM, Hubbard RC, Verburg KM, Geis GS. Reduced incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers with celecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, compared to naproxen in patients with arthritis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1019–1027. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03740.x.
    1. Langman MJ, Jensen DM, Watson DJ, Harper SE, Zhao PL, Quan H, Bolognese JA, Simon TJ. Adverse upper gastrointestinal effects of rofecoxib compared with NSAIDs. Jama. 1999;282:1929–1933. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.20.1929.
    1. Merck & Company, Inc. Merck announces voluntary worldwide withdrawal of VIOXX
    1. FDA
    1. Kearney PM, Baigent C, Godwin J, Halls H, Emberson JR, Patrono C. Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials. Bmj. 2006;332:1302–1308. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7553.1302.
    1. Singh G, Wu O, Langhorne P, Madhok R. Risk of acute myocardial infarction with nonselective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R153. doi: 10.1186/ar2047.
    1. Zelenakas K, Fricke JR, Jr, Jayawardene S, Kellstein D. Analgesic efficacy of single oral doses of lumiracoxib and ibuprofen in patients with postoperative dental pain. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58:251–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2004.00156.x.
    1. Willburger RE, Mysler E, Derbot J, Jung T, Thurston HJ, Kreiss A, Litschig S, Krammer G, Tate GA. Lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily is comparable to indomethacin 50 mg three times daily for the treatment of acute flares of gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1126–1132. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem090.
    1. Chan VW, Clark AJ, Davis JC, Wolf RS, Kellstein D, Jayawardene S. The post-operative analgesic efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib compared with placebo and naproxen after total knee or hip arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:1491–1500. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00782.x.
    1. Kyle C, Zachariah J, Kasangra M, Andrews C, Ellis G, Kinch H. Lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily is comparable to naproxen 500 mg twice daily for treatment of acute muscular pain following soft tissue injury [abstract] Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:241.
    1. Pavelka K, Zamani O, Alten R, Yu S, Litschig S, Sloan VS. Lumiracoxib is effective and well tolerated in the long-term treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:353.
    1. Fleischmann R, Tannenbaum H, Patel NP, Notter M, Sallstig P, Reginster J-Y. Retention on treatment with lumiracoxib in patients with osteoarthritis [abstract] Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:S165. doi: 10.1016/S1063-4584(07)60750-X.
    1. Schnitzer TJ, Burmester GR, Mysler E, Hochberg MC, Doherty M, Ehrsam E, Gitton X, Krammer G, Mellein B, Matchaba P, et al. Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), reduction in ulcer complications: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:665–674. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16893-1.
    1. Farkouh ME, Kirshner H, Harrington RA, Ruland S, Verheugt FW, Schnitzer TJ, Burmester GR, Mysler E, Hochberg MC, Doherty M, et al. Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), cardiovascular outcomes: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:675–684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16894-3.
    1. Hawkey CJ, Weinstein W, Smalley WE, Richard D, Krammer G, Sallstig P, Mellein B, Matchaba P. DDW. Washington DC; 2007. Significant early reduction of ulcer complications with lumiracoxib compared with naproxen at Day 8 of treatment in TARGET.
    1. Farkouh ME, Verheugt FWK, Kirshner H, Ruland S, Sallstig P, Stricker K, Krammer G, Mellein B, Gitton X, Matchaba P, et al. Lumiracoxib provides superior blood pressure profile compared to NSAIDs after 4 weeks of treatment. Poster No 1692, ACR/ARHP 2006 Annual Scientific Meeting, Washington.
    1. Traversa G, Bianchi C, Da Cas R, Abraha I, Menniti-Ippolito F, Venegoni M. Cohort study of hepatotoxicity associated with nimesulide and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. BMJ. 2003;327:18–22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.18.
    1. Hawkey CJ, Weinstein WM, Stricker K, Murphy V, Richard D, Krammer G, Rebuli R. Comparison of the gastrointestinal safety of lumiracoxib with traditional NSAIDs early after the initiation of treatment: findings from the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET) Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:838–845.
    1. Johnson AG, Nguyen TV, Day RO. Do nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs affect blood pressure? A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:289–300.
    1. Aw TJ, Haas SJ, Liew D, Krum H. Meta-analysis of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and their effects on blood pressure. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:490–496. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.5.IOI50013.
    1. Cannon CP, Curtis SP, FitzGerald GA, Krum H, Kaur A, Bolognese JA, Reicin AS, Bombardier C, Weinblatt ME, Heijde D van der, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) programme: a randomised comparison. Lancet. 2006;368:1771–1781. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69666-9.
    1. Singh G, Miller JD, Huse DM, Pettitt D, D'Agostino RB, Russell MW. Consequences of increased systolic blood pressure in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:714–719.
    1. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–1913. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8.
    1. Grover SA, Coupal L, Zowall H. Treating osteoarthritis with cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors: what are the benefits of avoiding blood pressure destabilization? Hypertension. 2005;45:92–97.
    1. MacDonald TM, Richard D, Lheritier T, Krammer G. Improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with osteoarthritis treated with lumiracoxib: randomized controlled trial of lumiracoxib versus ibuprofen [abstract] J Clin Hypertens. 2007;9:A91–A92.
    1. Whitehead A, Simmonds M, Mellein B, Friede T, Gitton X, Sallstig P. Blood pressure profile of lumiracoxib is similar to placebo in arthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:S168–S169. doi: 10.1016/S1063-4584(07)60757-2.
    1. Zacher J, Hasler P, Martín Mola E, Mellein B, Krammer G, Gitton X. Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET) of lumiracoxib versus NSAIDs: incidence of de-novo hypertension and oedema. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:483.
    1. FDA p. 10.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться