Pain cognitions and impact of low back pain after participation in a self-management program: a qualitative study

Lise Joern, Alice Kongsted, Line Thomassen, Jan Hartvigsen, Susanne Ravn, Lise Joern, Alice Kongsted, Line Thomassen, Jan Hartvigsen, Susanne Ravn

Abstract

Background: Benefits from low back pain (LBP) treatments seem to be related to patients changing their pain cognitions and developing an increased sense of control. Still, little is known about how these changes occur. The objective of this study was to gain insights into possible shifts in the understanding of LBP and the sense of being able to manage pain among patients participating in a LBP self-management intervention.

Methods: Using a qualitative study and a content analytic framework, we investigated the experiences of patients with LBP who participated in 'GLA:D® Back', a group-based structured patient education and exercise program. Data were generated through qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted between January 2019 and October 2019. Interviews focused on experiences with pain and were analysed using a thematic analytical approach. The Common Sense Model and self-efficacy theory formed the theoretical framework for the interpretations. Participants were sampled to represent people who were either dissatisfied or satisfied with their participation in GLA:D® Back. Fifteen participants aged 26-62, eight women and seven men, were interviewed from February to April 2020.

Results: Four main themes, corresponding to the characterisation of four patient groups, were identified: 'Feeling miscast, 'Maintaining reservations', 'Struggling with habits' and 'Handling it'. The participants within each group differed in how they understood, managed, and communicated about their LBP. Some retained the perception of LBP as a threatening disease, some expressed a changed understanding that did not translate into new behaviors, while others had changed their understanding of pain and their reaction to pain.

Conclusions: The same intervention was experienced very differently by different people dependent on how messages and communication resonated with the individual patient's experiences and prior understanding of LBP. Awareness of the ways that individuals' understanding of LBP interact with behaviour and physical activities appear central for providing adaptive professional support and meeting the needs of individual patients.

Keywords: Back pain; Common sense model; Pain perceptions; Self-efficacy; Self-management.

Conflict of interest statement

GLA:D® is a non-profit initiative hosted at the University of Southern Denmark and the GLA:D® trademark is property of the University of Southern Denmark. The GLA:D initiative is developed in close collaboration with the SDU Research and Innovation Organisation, including legal reviews. The researchers do not have any personal financial benefits from working with the project. AK’s position at University of Southern Denmark is partly funded by the Danish Foundation for Chiropractic Research and Post Graduate Education. AK is co-developer of GLA:D® Back and an Associate Editor for Chiropractic and Manual Therapies. JH holds research grants from Danish an international funders and is co-developer of GLA:D® Back.

© 2022. The Author(s).

References

    1. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Cross M, et al. Prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years due to musculoskeletal disorders for 195 countries and territories 1990–2017. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(4):702–714. doi: 10.1002/art.41571.
    1. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22.
    1. Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356–2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X.
    1. Lee H, Hubscher M, Moseley GL, et al. How does pain lead to disability? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies in people with back and neck pain. Pain. 2015;156(6):988–997. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000146.
    1. Bunzli S, Smith A, Schutze R, et al. Beliefs underlying pain-related fear and how they evolve: a qualitative investigation in people with chronic back pain and high pain-related fear. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e008847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008847.
    1. Miles CL, Pincus T, Carnes D, et al. Can we identify how programmes aimed at promoting self-management in musculoskeletal pain work and who benefits? A systematic review of sub-group analysis within RCTs. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(8):775.e1–11.
    1. O'Neill A, O'Sullivan K, O'Sullivan P, et al. Examining what factors mediate treatment effect in chronic low back pain: a mediation analysis of a cognitive functional therapy clinical trial. Eur J Pain. 2020;24(9):1765–1774. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1624.
    1. Fordham B, Ji C, Hansen Z, et al. Explaining how cognitive behavioral approaches work for low back pain: mediation analysis of the back skills training trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42(17):E1031–E9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002066.
    1. Kongsted A, Ris I, Kjaer P, et al. GLA:D® Back: implementation of group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of back pain - protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2443-1.
    1. Kjaer P, Kongsted A, Ris I, et al. GLA:D® Back group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of back pain-development, theories and scientific evidence. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2334-x.
    1. Leventhal H, Phillips LA, Burns E. The common-sense model of self-regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. J Behav Med. 2016;39(6):935–946. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2.
    1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theori. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co; 1997.
    1. Breland JY, Wong JJ, McAndrew LM. Are Common Sense Model constructs and self-efficacy simultaneously correlated with self-management behaviors and health outcomes: a systematic review. Health Psychology Open. 2020;7(1):2055102919898846. doi: 10.1177/2055102919898846.
    1. Lau-Walker M. A conceptual care model for individualized care approach in cardiac rehabilitation–combining both illness representation and self-efficacy. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11(Pt 1):103–117. doi: 10.1348/135910705X41914.
    1. Baumann LJ, Leventhal H. I can tell when my blood pressure is up, can't I? Health Psychol. 1985;4(3):203–218. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.203.
    1. Bunzli S, Smith A, Schutze R, et al. Making sense of low back pain and pain-related fear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(9):628–636. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7434.
    1. Meyer D, Leventhal H, Gutmann M. Common-sense models of illness: the example of hypertension. Health Psychol. 1985;4(2):115–135. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.4.2.115.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
    1. Ris I, Broholm D, Hartvigsen J, et al. Adherence and characteristics of participants enrolled in a standardised programme of patient education and exercises for low back pain, GLA:D® Back—a prospective observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04329-y.
    1. Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, Boyle E, et al. GLA:D®Back: group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of persistent back pain - feasibility of implementing standardised care by a course for clinicians. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:65. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0448-z.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
    1. Holland P, Clayton S. Navigating employment retention with a chronic health condition: a meta-ethnography of the employment experiences of people with musculoskeletal disorders in the UK. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(8):1071–1086. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1519041.
    1. Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, et al. A synthesis of qualitative research exploring the barriers to staying in work with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):566–572. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1049377.
    1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    1. Grønne DT, Ris I, Kongsted A et al. [GLAD Danmark Årsrapport 2020]. University of Southern Denmark; 2020.
    1. O'Keeffe M, O'Sullivan P, Purtill H, et al. Cognitive functional therapy compared with a group-based exercise and education intervention for chronic low back pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(13):782–789. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100780.
    1. O'Sullivan PB, Caneiro JP, O'Keeffe M, et al. Cognitive functional therapy: an integrated behavioral approach for the targeted management of disabling low back pain. Phys Ther. 2018;98(5):408–423. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy022.
    1. de Raaij EJ, Ostelo RW, Maissan F, et al. The association of illness perception and prognosis for pain and physical function in patients with noncancer musculoskeletal pain: a systematic literature review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(10):789–800. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.8072.
    1. Dijkstra A, Vlaeyen JW, Rijnen H, et al. Readiness to adopt the self-management approach to cope with chronic pain in fibromyalgic patients. Pain. 2001;90(1–2):37–45. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00384-5.
    1. Marshall SJ, Biddle SJ. The transtheoretical model of behavior change: a meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise. Ann Behav Med. 2001;23(4):229–246. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2304_2.
    1. Walton H, Spector A, Tombor I, et al. Measures of fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions: a systematic review of measure quality. Br J Health Psychol. 2017;22(4):872–903. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12260.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться