A new measurement for posterior tilt predicts reoperation in undisplaced femoral neck fractures: 113 consecutive patients treated by internal fixation and followed for 1 year

Henrik Palm, Kasper Gosvig, Michael Krasheninnikoff, Steffen Jacobsen, Peter Gebuhr, Henrik Palm, Kasper Gosvig, Michael Krasheninnikoff, Steffen Jacobsen, Peter Gebuhr

Abstract

Background and purpose: Preoperative posterior tilt in undisplaced (Garden I-II) femoral neck fractures is thought to influence rates of reoperation. However, an exact method for its measurement has not yet been presented. We designed a new measurement for posterior tilt on preoperative lateral radiographs and investigated its association with later reoperation.

Patients and methods: A consecutive series of 113 patients, > or = 60 years of age with undisplaced (Garden I-II) femoral neck fractures treated with two parallel implants, was assessed regarding patient characteristics, radiographs, and rate of reoperation within the first year. In a subgroup of 50 randomly selected patients, reliability tests for measurement of posterior tilt were performed.

Results: Intra- and interclass coefficients for the new measurement were > or = 0.94. 23% (26/113) of patients were reoperated and increased posterior tilt was an accurate predictor of failure (p = 0.002). 14/25 of posteriorly tilted fractures > or = 20 degrees were reoperated, as compared to 12/88 of fractures with less tilt (p < 0.001). In multiple logistic regression analysis including sex, age, ASA score, cognitive function, new mobility score, time from admission to operation, surgeon's expertise, postoperative reduction, and implant positioning, a preoperative posterior tilt of > or = 20 degrees was the only significant predictor of reoperation (p < 0.001).

Interpretation: The new measurement for posterior tilt appears to be reliable and able to predict reoperation in patients with undisplaced (Garden I-II) femoral neck fractures.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preoperative anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of a 60-year-old male patient who sustained a Garden I–II femoral neck fracture. The posterior tilt is measured as the angle (α) between the mid-collum line (MCL) and the radius collum line (RCL), which is drawn from the center (c) of the caput circle to the crossing of the caput circle and the mid-collum line.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution of posterior tilt and rates of reoperation in the 113 patients who were operated on with internal fixation for a Garden I–II femoral neck fracture. Numbers in parenthesis are (reoperated patients / patients) in the relevant group.

References

    1. Alho A, Benterud JG, Ronningen H, Hoiseth A. Radiographic prediction of early failure in femoral neck fracture. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62:422–6.
    1. Alho A, Benterud JG, Ronningen H, Hoiseth A. Predicture of disturbed healing in femoral neck fracture. Radiographic analysis of 149 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63:639–44.
    1. American Society of Anasthesiologits A new classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:111.
    1. Bjorgul K, Reikeras O. Outcome of undisplaced and moderately displaced femoral neck fractures. A prospective study of 466 patients treated by internal fixation. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:498–504.
    1. Conn KS, Parker MJ. Undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures: results of internal fixation in 375 patients (Review). Clin Orthop. 2004;(421):249–54.
    1. Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Kristensen BB, Jensen PS, Kehlet H. Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on rehabilitation and pain after hip fracture surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:1197–204.
    1. Garden RS. Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1961;43:647–63.
    1. Mjorud J, Skaro O, Solhaug JH, Thorngren KG. A randomised study in all cervical hip fractures osteosynthesis with Hansson hook-pins versus AO-screws in 199 consecutive patients followed for two years. Injury. 2006;37:768–77.
    1. Muller ME. Classification and international AO-documentation of femur fractures. Unfallheilkunde. 1980;83:251–9.
    1. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(Suppl)
    1. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification, Database and Outcomes Committee Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;10(Suppl)
    1. Palm H, Jacobsen S, Krasheninnikoff M, Foss NB, Kehlet H, Gebuhr P. Influence of surgeon's experience and supervision on reoperation rate after hip fracture surgery. Injury. 2007;38:775–9. Hip Fracture Study Group.
    1. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993;75:797–8.
    1. Parker MJ, Stockton G, Gurusamy K. Internal fixation implants for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2001;(4) Art. No.: CD0001467. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
    1. Parker MJ, Raghavan R, Gurusamy K. Incidence of fracture-healing complications after femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop. 2007;(458):175–9.
    1. Quereshi KN, Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a ten-question mental test in the institutionalised elderly. Age Ageing. 1974;3:152–7.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться