Once-weekly versus twice-weekly carfilzomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis of two phase I/II studies

Sara Bringhen, Roberto Mina, Maria Teresa Petrucci, Gianluca Gaidano, Stelvio Ballanti, Pellegrino Musto, Massimo Offidani, Stefano Spada, Giulia Benevolo, Elena Ponticelli, Piero Galieni, Michele Cavo, Tommaso Caravita Di Toritto, Francesco Di Raimondo, Vittorio Montefusco, Antonio Palumbo, Mario Boccadoro, Alessandra Larocca, Sara Bringhen, Roberto Mina, Maria Teresa Petrucci, Gianluca Gaidano, Stelvio Ballanti, Pellegrino Musto, Massimo Offidani, Stefano Spada, Giulia Benevolo, Elena Ponticelli, Piero Galieni, Michele Cavo, Tommaso Caravita Di Toritto, Francesco Di Raimondo, Vittorio Montefusco, Antonio Palumbo, Mario Boccadoro, Alessandra Larocca

Abstract

Twice-weekly carfilzomib is approved at 27 and 56 mg/m2 to treat relapsed multiple myeloma patients. In the phase III study ARROW, once-weekly 70 mg/m 2 carfilzomib prolonged the median progression-free survival of relapsed multiple myeloma patients in comparison with twice-weekly 27 mg/m2 carfilzomib, without adding significant toxicity. Data were pooled from two phase I/II studies of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who received nine induction cycles of carfilzomib (either 70 mg/m2 once-weekly or 36 mg/m2 twice-weekly), cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, followed by carfilzomib maintenance. Overall, 121 transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were analyzed (once-weekly, n=63; twice-weekly, n=58). We found no significant difference in median progression-free survival [35.7 months (95%CI: 23.7-not reached, NR) vs 35.5 months (95%CI: 24.3-NR); HR: 1.39; P=0.26] and 3-year overall survival [70% [95%CI: 59%-84%) vs 72% (95%CI: 60%-85%); HR: 1.27; P=0.5] between once-weekly and twice-weekly carfilzomib. From the start of maintenance, 3-year progression-free survival [47% (95%CI: 33%-68%) vs 51% (95%CI: 38%-70%); HR: 1.04; P=0.92] and overall survival [72% (95%CI: 58%-89%) vs 73% (95%CI: 59%-90%); HR: 0.82; P=0.71] were similar in the once- versus twice-weekly carfilzomib. The rate of grade 3-5 hematologic (24% vs 30%; P=0.82) and non-hematologic (38% vs 41%; P=0.83) adverse events was similar in the two groups. Once-weekly 70 mg/m2 carfilzomib as induction and maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients was as safe and effective as twice-weekly 36 mg/m2 carfilzomib and provided a more convenient schedule. The trials are registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: 01857115 (IST-CAR-561) and 01346787 (IST-CAR-506).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01346787.

Copyright© 2019 Ferrata Storti Foundation.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Analysis profile. N: number; AE: adverse events; PD: progressive disease; SPM: second primary malignancy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Once-weekly versus twice-weekly carfilzomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (A) Intention-to-treat progression-free survival (ITT PFS). (B) Intention-to-treat progression-free survival 2 (ITT PFS-2). (C) Intention-to-treat overall survival (ITT OS). (Note that PFS-2 was calculated from the date of enrollment to the date of second relapse/progression or death or the date the patient was last known to be in remission.)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Analysis from start of maintenance therapy. (A) Progression-free survival from start of maintenance therapy (PFS_m). (B) Progression-free survival 2 from start of maintenance therapy (PFS-2_m). (C) Overall survival from start of maintenance therapy (OS_m). (Note that PFS-2 was calculated from the date of enrollment to the date of second relapse/progression or death or the date the patient was last known to be in remission.)

References

    1. Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, et al. Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia. 2014;28(5):1122–1128.
    1. San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Persistent Overall Survival Benefit and No Increased Risk of Second Malignancies With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone Versus Melphalan-Prednisone in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(4):448–455.
    1. Bringhen S, Larocca A, Rossi D, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients. Blood. 2010;116(23):4745–4753.
    1. Dytfeld D, Jasielec J, Griffith KA, et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2014;99(9):e162–164.
    1. Facon T, Lee JH, Moreau P, et al. Phase 3 Study (CLARION) of Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone (KMP) v Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone (VMP) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM). Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17(1):e26–e27.
    1. Bringhen S, Petrucci MT, Larocca A, et al. Carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a multicenter, phase 2 study. Blood. 2014;124(1):63–69.
    1. Bringhen S, D’Agostino M, De Paoli L, et al. Phase 1/2 study of weekly carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone in newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible myeloma. Leukemia. 2018;32(4):979–985.
    1. Berenson JR, Cartmell A, Bessudo A, et al. CHAMPION-1: a phase 1/2 study of once-weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;127(26):3360–3368.
    1. Moreau P, Mateos M-V, Berenson JR, et al. Once weekly versus twice weekly carfilzomib dosing in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (A.R.R.O.W.): interim analysis results of a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19(7):953–964.
    1. National Cancer Institute [USA]. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version. 4.0. US Department of Health and Human Services; May 28, 2009.
    1. Sonneveld P, Avet-Loiseau H, Lonial S, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood. 2016;127(24):2955–2962.
    1. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos M-V, et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: An International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood. 2015;125(13):2068–2074.
    1. Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):142–152.
    1. Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Griffith KA, et al. A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012; 120(9):1801–1809.
    1. Gay F, Rota Scalabrini D, Belotti A, et al. Updated efficacy and MRD data according to risk-status in newly diagnosed myeloma patients treated with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or cyclosphosphamide: Results from the FORTE trial. HemaSphere 2018;2(S1):6 [Abstract #S109, EHA 2018 23rd Congress].
    1. Gay F, Foà R, Musto P, et al. Updated efficacy data and MRD analysis according to risk status in newly diagnosed myeloma patients treated with carfilzomib + lenalidomide or cyclophosphamide (FORTE trial). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15_suppl) [Abstract #8009, ASCO 2018 Annual Meeting].
    1. Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Palumbo A, et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(1):27–38.
    1. Dimopoulos MA, Goldschmidt H, Niesvizky R, et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1327–1337.
    1. Boccia RV, Bessudo A, Agajanian R, et al. A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 1b Study of Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients (CHAMPION-2). Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017; 17(7):433–437.
    1. Sonneveld P, Asselbergs E, Zweegman S, et al. Phase 2 study of carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction/consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2015; 125(3):449–456.
    1. Chng W-J, Goldschmidt H, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib–dexamethasone vs bortezomib–dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR. Leukemia. 2017;31(6):1368–1374.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться