Feasibility of a blended group treatment (bGT) for major depression: uncontrolled interventional study in a university setting

Raphael Schuster, Isabelle Fichtenbauer, Verena Maria Sparr, Thomas Berger, Anton-Rupert Laireiter, Raphael Schuster, Isabelle Fichtenbauer, Verena Maria Sparr, Thomas Berger, Anton-Rupert Laireiter

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the feasibility of a novel blended (face-to-face and computer-based) group intervention for the reduction of depressive symptoms in major depression.

Design: Patient-centred uncontrolled interventional study.

Setting: University setting in a general community sample. A multimodal recruitment strategy (public health centres and public areas) was applied.

Participants: Based on independent interviews, 26 participants, diagnosed with major depressive disorder (81% female; 23% comorbidity >1 and 23% comorbidity >2), entered treatment.

Intervention: Acceptance and mindfulness based, as well as self-management and resource-oriented psychotherapy principles served as the theoretical basis for the low-threshold intervention. The blended format included face-to-face sessions, complemented with multimedia presentations and a platform featuring videos, online work sheets, an unguided group chat and remote therapist-patient communication.

Main outcome measures: The Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire.

Results: Large to very large within group effect sizes were found on self-reported depression (F(2, 46.37)=25.69, p<0.001; d=1.80), general health (F(2,46.73)=11.47, p<0.001; d=1.32), personal resources (F(2,43.36)=21.17, p<0.001; d=0.90) and mindfulness (F(2,46.22)=9.40, p<0.001; d=1.12) after a follow-up period of 3 months. Treatment satisfaction was high, and 69% ranked computer and multimedia use as a therapeutic factor. Furthermore, participants described treatment intensification as important advantage of the blended format. Half of the patients (48%) would have preferred more time for personal exchange.

Conclusion: The investigated blended group format seems feasible for the reduction of depressive symptoms in major depression. The development of blended interventions can benefit from assuring that highly structured treatments actually meet patients' needs. As a next step, the intervention should be tested in comparative trials in routine care.

Trial registration number: DRKS00010894; Pre-results.

Keywords: blended group therapy; blended therapy; depression; group therapy; online interventions; therapeutic factors.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study’s flow chart.

References

    1. Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry 2016;3:171–8. 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00505-2
    1. Tomlinson M, Rudan I, Saxena S, et al. . Setting priorities for global mental health research. Bull World Health Organ 2009;87:438–46. 10.2471/BLT.08.054353
    1. Wykes T, Haro JM, Belli SR, et al. . Mental health research priorities for Europe. Lancet Psychiatry 2015;2:1036–42. 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00332-6
    1. Cuijpers P, Riper H, Andersson G. Internet-based treatment of depression. Curr Opin Psychol 2015;4:131–5. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.026
    1. Păsărelu CR, Andersson G, Bergman Nordgren L, et al. . Internet-delivered transdiagnostic and tailored cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cogn Behav Ther 2017;46:1–28. 10.1080/16506073.2016.1231219
    1. Andersson G, Titov N. Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry 2014;13:4–11. 10.1002/wps.20083
    1. Emmelkamp PM, David D, Beckers T, et al. . Advancing psychotherapy and evidence-based psychological interventions. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2014;23(Suppl 1):58–91. 10.1002/mpr.1411
    1. Titov N, Dear BF, Staples LG, et al. . Mindspot clinic: an accessible, efficient, and effective online treatment service for anxiety and depression. Psychiatr Serv 2015;66:1043–50. 10.1176/appi.ps.201400477
    1. Hedman E, Ljótsson B, Kaldo V, et al. . Effectiveness of Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for depression in routine psychiatric care. J Affect Disord 2014;155:49–58. 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.023
    1. Kenter R, Warmerdam L, Brouwer-Dudokdewit C, et al. . Guided online treatment in routine mental health care: an observational study on uptake, drop-out and effects. BMC Psychiatry 2013;13:43 10.1186/1471-244X-13-43
    1. Ebert DD, Hannig W, Tarnowski T, et al. . [Web-based rehabilitation aftercare following inpatient psychosomatic treatment]. Rehabilitation 2013;52:164–72. 10.1055/s-0033-1345191
    1. Erbe D, Eichert HC, Riper H, et al. . Blending face-to-face and internet-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders in adults: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e306 10.2196/jmir.6588
    1. van der Vaart R, Witting M, Riper H, et al. . Blending online therapy into regular face-to-face therapy for depression: content, ratio and preconditions according to patients and therapists using a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry 2014;14:355 10.1186/s12888-014-0355-z
    1. Kooistra LC, Wiersma JE, Ruwaard J, et al. . Blended vs. face-to-face cognitive behavioural treatment for major depression in specialized mental health care: study protocol of a randomized controlled cost-effectiveness trial. BMC Psychiatry 2014;14:290 10.1186/s12888-014-0290-z
    1. Kaiser T, Laireiter AR. DynAMo: a modular platform for monitoring process, outcome, and algorithm-based treatment planning in psychotherapy. JMIR Med Inform 2017;5:e20 10.2196/medinform.6808
    1. Månsson KN, Skagius Ruiz E, Gervind E, et al. . Development and initial evaluation of an Internet-based support system for face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy: a proof of concept study. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e280 10.2196/jmir.3031
    1. Ly KH, Trüschel A, Jarl L, et al. . Behavioural activation versus mindfulness-based guided self-help treatment administered through a smartphone application: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2014;4:e003440 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003440
    1. Selmi PM, Klein MH, Greist JH, et al. . An investigation of computer-assisted cognitive-behavior therapy in the treatment of depression. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1982;14:181–5. 10.3758/BF03202150
    1. Selmi PM, Klein MH, Greist JH, et al. . Computer-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression. Am J Psychiatry 1990;147:51–6. 10.1176/ajp.147.1.51
    1. Newman MG, Kenardy J, Herman S, et al. . The use of hand-held computers as an adjunct to cognitive-behavior therapy. Comput Human Behav 1996;12:135–43. 10.1016/0747-5632(95)00024-0
    1. Wright JH, Wright AS, Salmon P, et al. . Development and initial testing of a multimedia program for computer-assisted cognitive therapy. Am J Psychother 2002;56:76.
    1. Wright JH, Wright AS, Albano AM, et al. . Computer-assisted cognitive therapy for depression: maintaining efficacy while reducing therapist time. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:1158–64. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1158
    1. Kleiboer A, Smit J, Bosmans J, et al. . European COMPARative Effectiveness research on blended Depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED): study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries. Trials 2016;17:387 10.1186/s13063-016-1511-1
    1. Waller G. Evidence-based treatment and therapist drift. Behav Res Ther 2009;47:119–27. 10.1016/j.brat.2008.10.018
    1. Ruwaard J, Kok R. Wild West eHealth: Time to hold our horses. European Health Psychologist 2015;17:45–9.
    1. Schuster R, Berger T, Laireiter A-R. Computer und Psychotherapie – geht das zusammen? Zum Stand der Entwicklung von Online-und gemischten Interventionen in der Psychotherapie. Psychotherapeut 2017. 10.1007/s00278-017-0214-8
    1. Riedel M. Modelle der Psychotherapieversorgung in Österreich; Endbericht; Studie im Auftrag des Hauptverbandes der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger. 2015. (accessed 3 Apr 2015).
    1. Weber R, Strauss B. Group psychotherapy in Germany. Int J Group Psychother 2015;65:513–25. 10.1521/ijgp.2015.65.4.513
    1. Yalom ID, Leszcz M. Theory and practice of group psychotherapy. 5th edn New York: Basic books, 2005.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression in adults: recognition and management. Clinical Guideline 90. 2009.
    1. Gruber K, Moran PJ, Roth WT, et al. . Computer-assisted cognitive behavioral group therapy for social phobia. Behav Ther 2001;32:155–65. 10.1016/S0005-7894(01)80050-2
    1. Przeworski A, Newman MG. Palmtop computer-assisted group therapy for social phobia. J Clin Psychol 2004;60:179–88. 10.1002/jclp.10246
    1. Newman MG, Przeworski A, Consoli AJ, et al. . A randomized controlled trial of ecological momentary intervention plus brief group therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy 2014;51:198–206. 10.1037/a0032519
    1. Miloff A, Marklund A, Carlbring P. The challenger app for social anxiety disorder: New advances in mobile psychological treatment. Internet Interv 2015;2:382–91. 10.1016/j.invent.2015.08.001
    1. Schuster R, Leitner I, Carlbring P, et al. . Exploring blended group interventions for depression: Randomised controlled feasibility study of a blended computer- and multimedia-supported psychoeducational group intervention for adults with depressive symptoms. Internet Interv 2017;8:63–71. 10.1016/j.invent.2017.04.001
    1. Ellis LA, Collin P, Hurley PJ, et al. . Young men’s attitudes and behaviour in relation to mental health and technology: implications for the development of online mental health services. BMC Psychiatry 2013;13:119 10.1186/1471-244X-13-119
    1. Grawe K. Psychological therapy. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 2004.
    1. Rehm LP. Self-management therapy for depression. Behav Res Ther 1984;6:83–98. 10.1016/0146-6402(84)90004-3
    1. Ly KH, Topooco N, Cederlund H, et al. . Smartphone-Supported versus Full Behavioural Activation for Depression: A Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS One 2015;10:e0126559 10.1371/journal.pone.0126559
    1. Kooistra LC, Ruwaard J, Wiersma JE, et al. . Development and initial evaluation of blended cognitive behavioural treatment for major depression in routine specialized mental health care. Internet Interv 2016;4:61–71. 10.1016/j.invent.2016.01.003
    1. Delgadillo J, Kellett S, Ali S, et al. . A multi-service practice research network study of large group psychoeducational cognitive behavioural therapy. Behav Res Ther 2016;87:155–61. 10.1016/j.brat.2016.09.010
    1. Margraf J. Mini-DIPS: diagnostisches kurz-interview bei psychischen störungen. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2013.
    1. Margraf J, Schneider S, Ehlers A, et al. . DIPS diagnostisches interview bei psychischen störungen: interviewleitfaden. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2013.
    1. DeLucia-Waack JL, Kalodner CR, Riva M. Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.
    1. Hautzinger M, Bailer M. Allgemeine Depressions Skala (ADS). Manual. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz, 1993.
    1. Hautzinger M, Bailer M, Hofmeister D, et al. . Allgemeine depressions skala. manual. 2nd edn Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 2012.
    1. Goldberg DP, Williams PA. A users’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson, 1988.
    1. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, et al. . The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 1997;27:191–7. 10.1017/S0033291796004242
    1. Schmitz N, Kruse J, Tress W. Psychometric properties of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in a German primary care sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999;100:462–8. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb10898.x
    1. Cano A, Sprafkin RP, Scaturo DJ, et al. . Mental health screening in primary care: a comparison of 3 brief measures of psychological distress. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2001;3:206–10.
    1. Jack M. Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Ressourcen und Selbstmanagementfahigkeiten (FERUS). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 2007.
    1. Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;84:822–48. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
    1. Michalak J, Heidenreich T, Ströhle G, et al. . Die deutsche Version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) Psychometrische Befunde zu einem Achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Z Klin Psychol Psychother 2008;37:200–8. 10.1026/1616-3443.37.3.200
    1. Brooke J. et al. . SUS: “A quick and dirty” usability scale : Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL, Usability evaluation in industry. London, UK: Taylor, 1996:189–94.
    1. Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 2009;4:114–23.
    1. Schmidt J, Lamprecht F, Wittmann WW. Zufriedenheit mit der stationären Versorgung. Entwicklung eines Fragebogens und erste Validitätsuntersuchungen. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie 1989;39:248–55.
    1. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, et al. . Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann 1979;2:197–207. 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6
    1. Ibm C. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM, Corp, 2016.
    1. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:12–19. 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
    1. Lambert MJ, Ogles BM. Using clinical significance in psychotherapy outcome research: the need for a common procedure and validity data. Psychother Res 2009;19:493–501. 10.1080/10503300902849483
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175–91. 10.3758/BF03193146
    1. Zumbach J. Lernen mit neuen medien. Instruktions psychologische grundlagen. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer, 2010.
    1. Bauer S, Wolf M, Haug S, et al. . The effectiveness of internet chat groups in relapse prevention after inpatient psychotherapy. Psychother Res 2011;21:219–26. 10.1080/10503307.2010.547530
    1. Schulz A, Stolz T, Vincent A, et al. . A sorrow shared is a sorrow halved? A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing internet-based clinician-guided individual versus group treatment for social anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther 2016;84:14–26. 10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.001
    1. Schuster R. Patients’ experiences of blended Group Therapy for Depression – Part 1: Fit and Implications for the Group Setting. 2017.
    1. Zwerenz R, Becker J, Knickenberg RJ, et al. . Online self-help as an add-on to inpatient psychotherapy: efficacy of a new blended treatment approach. Psychother Psychosom 2017;86:341–50. 10.1159/000481177
    1. Berger T, Krieger T, Sude K, et al. . Evaluating an e-mental health program ("deprexis") as adjunctive treatment tool in psychotherapy for depression: Results of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord 2018;227 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.021
    1. Topooco N, Riper H, Araya R, et al. . Attitudes towards digital treatment for depression: a European stakeholder survey. Internet Interv 2017;8:1–9. 10.1016/j.invent.2017.01.001
    1. Nicholas J, Boydell K, Christensen H. mHealth in psychiatry: time for methodological change. Evid Based Ment Health 2016;19:33–4. 10.1136/eb-2015-102278
    1. Yardley L, Spring BJ, Riper H, et al. . Understanding and promoting effective engagement with digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med 2016;51:833–42. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.015
    1. Kenter RMF, van de Ven PM, Cuijpers P, et al. . Costs and effects of internet cognitive behavioral treatment blended with face-to-face treatment: results from a naturalistic study. Internet Interv 2015;2:77–83. 10.1016/j.invent.2015.01.001
    1. El Alaoui S, Hedman E, Kaldo V, et al. . Effectiveness of Internet-based cognitive-behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder in clinical psychiatry. J Consult Clin Psychol 2015;83:902–14. 10.1037/a0039198
    1. Lindner P, Nyström MBT, Hassmén P, et al. . Who seeks ICBT for depression and how do they get there? Effects of recruitment source on patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Internet Interv 2015;2:221–5. 10.1016/j.invent.2015.04.002

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться