Motor Sequence Learning and Consolidation in Unilateral De Novo Patients with Parkinson's Disease

Xiaojuan Dan, Bradley R King, Julien Doyon, Piu Chan, Xiaojuan Dan, Bradley R King, Julien Doyon, Piu Chan

Abstract

Previous research investigating motor sequence learning (MSL) and consolidation in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) has predominantly included heterogeneous participant samples with early and advanced disease stages; thus, little is known about the onset of potential behavioral impairments. We employed a multisession MSL paradigm to investigate whether behavioral deficits in learning and consolidation appear immediately after or prior to the detection of clinical symptoms in the tested (left) hand. Specifically, our patient sample was limited to recently diagnosed patients with pure unilateral PD. The left hand symptomatic (LH-S) patients provided an assessment of performance following the onset of clinical symptoms in the tested hand. Conversely, right hand affected (left hand asymptomatic, LH-A) patients served to investigate whether MSL impairments appear before symptoms in the tested hand. LH-S patients demonstrated impaired learning during the initial training session and both LH-S and LH-A patients demonstrated decreased performance compared to controls during the next-day retest. Critically, the impairments in later learning stages in the LH-A patients were evident even before the appearance of traditional clinical symptoms in the tested hand. Results may be explained by the progression of disease-related alterations in relevant corticostriatal networks.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Experimental Design.
Fig 1. Experimental Design.
See text for details of each phase. W/U = warm-up.
Fig 2. Block Duration in Session 1…
Fig 2. Block Duration in Session 1 (A) and Session 2 (B).
Data points represent group means for each block and error bars depict standard errors. Black squares = healthy controls; blue circles = left hand asymptomatic (LH-A) patients with PD; red crosses = left hand symptomatic patients (LH-S) with PD. Thick solid lines represent group-averaged trajectories based on a single exponential fit.
Fig 3. The number of correct sequences…
Fig 3. The number of correct sequences in Session 1 (A) and Session 2 (B).
Data points represent group means for each block and error bars depict standard errors. Black squares = healthy controls; blue circles = left hand asymptomatic (LH-A) patients with PD; red crosses = left hand symptomatic patients (LH-S) with PD.
Fig 4. Performance Index (PI) in Session…
Fig 4. Performance Index (PI) in Session 1 (A) and Session 2 (B).
Data points represent group means for each block and error bars depict standard errors. Black squares = healthy controls; blue circles = left hand asymptomatic (LH-A) patients with PD; red crosses = left hand symptomatic patients (LH-S) with PD. Thick solid lines represent group-averaged trajectories based on a single exponential fit.
Fig 5. Schematic of how performance on…
Fig 5. Schematic of how performance on the MSL task may reflect disease progression.
All participants completed the MSL task with their non-dominant left hand. X’s denote the affected side and the size of the X represents the relative magnitude of the impairment. Squares indicate that the right (contralateral) striatum is more critical for the execution of the MSL task since the left hand was used. In the left hand symptomatic (LH-S) group, the MSL task targeted the more affected right striatum. In contrast, in the left hand asymptomatic (LH-A) group, motor deficits were limited to the right side; thus, the MSL task targeted the less affected right striatum. In the control group, the MSL task targeted the intact right striatum. Comparison of the experimental groups may represent progression of PD. Please note that this schematic is intended to depict the laterality aspect of the research approach and does not address changes within striatal subregions as a function of MSL training. These details are discussed in the main text.

References

    1. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature. 1995;377: 155–158.
    1. Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, et al. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95: 861–8.
    1. Walker MP, Brakefield T, Hobson JA, Stickgold R. Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Nature. 2003;425: 616–620.
    1. Doyon J, Benali H. Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15: 161–7.
    1. Debas K, Carrier J, Orban P, Barakat M, Lungu O, Vandewalle G, et al. Brain plasticity related to the consolidation of motor sequence learning and motor adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107: 17839–17844. 10.1073/pnas.1013176107
    1. Doyon J, Bellec P, Amsel R, Penhune V, Monchi O, Carrier J, et al. Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning. Behav Brain Res. 2009;199: 61–75. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.012
    1. Albouy G, King BR, Maquet P, Doyon J. Hippocampus and striatum: Dynamics and interaction during acquisition and sleep-related motor sequence memory consolidation. Hippocampus. 2013;23: 985–1004. 10.1002/hipo.22183
    1. Albouy G, Fogel S, King BR, Laventure S, Benali H, Karni A, et al. Maintaining vs. Enhancing Motor Sequence Memories: Respective Roles of Striatal and Hippocampal Systems. Neuroimage. 2015;108: 423–34. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.049
    1. Fogel SM, Albouy G, Vien C, Popovicci R, King BR, Hoge R, et al. fMRI and sleep correlates of the age-related impairment in motor memory consolidation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35: 3625–3645. 10.1002/hbm.22426
    1. Helmuth LL, Mayr U, Daum I. Sequence learning in Parkinson’s disease: a comparison of spatial-attention and number-response sequences. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38: 1443–51.
    1. Stefanova ED, Kostic VS, Ziropadja L, Markovic M, Ocic GG. Visuomotor skill learning on serial reaction time task in patients with early Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2000;15: 1095–103.
    1. Smith J, Siegert RJ, McDowall J, Abernethy D. Preserved implicit learning on both the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain Cogn. 2001;45: 378–91.
    1. Ghilardi M-F, Eidelberg D, Silvestri G, Ghez C. The differential effect of PD and normal aging on early explicit sequence learning. Neurology. 2003;60: 1313–9.
    1. Deroost N, Kerckhofs E, Coene M, Wijnants G, Soetens E. Learning sequence movements in a homogenous sample of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44: 1653–62.
    1. Siegert RJ, Taylor KD, Weatherall M, Abernethy DA. Is implicit sequence learning impaired in Parkinson’s disease? A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology. 2006;20: 490–5.
    1. Muslimovic D, Post B, Speelman JD, Schmand B. Motor procedural learning in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2007;130: 2887–97.
    1. Seidler RD, Tuite P, Ashe J. Selective impairments in implicit learning in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res. 2007;1137: 104–10.
    1. Doyon J. Motor sequence learning and movement disorders. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008;21: 478–483. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328304b6a3
    1. Kwak Y, Muller MLTM, Bohnen NI, Dayalu P, Seidler RD. Effect of dopaminergic medications on the time course of explicit motor sequence learning in parkinson’s disease. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103: 942–949. 10.1152/jn.00197.2009
    1. Stephan MA, Meier B, Zaugg SW, Kaelin-Lang A. Motor sequence learning performance in Parkinson’s disease patients depends on the stage of disease. Brain Cogn. 2011;75: 135–40. 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.10.015
    1. Terpening Z, Naismith S, Melehan K, Gittins C, Bolitho S, Lewis SJG. The contribution of nocturnal sleep to the consolidation of motor skill learning in healthy ageing and Parkinson’s disease. J Sleep Res. 2013;22: 398–405. 10.1111/jsr.12028
    1. Ruitenberg MFL, Duthoo W, Santens P, Notebaert W, Abrahamse EL. Sequential movement skill in Parkinson’s disease: A state-of-the-art. Cortex. 2015;65C: 102–112.
    1. Kwak Y, Müller MLTM, Bohnen NI, Dayalu P, Seidler RD. l-DOPA changes ventral striatum recruitment during motor sequence learning in Parkinson’s disease. Behav Brain Res. 2012;230: 116–24. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.02.006
    1. Kwak Y, Bohnen NI, Müller MLTM, Dayalu P, Seidler RD. Striatal denervation pattern predicts levodopa effects on sequence learning in Parkinson’s disease. J Mot Behav. 2013;45: 423–9. 10.1080/00222895.2013.817380
    1. Doyon J, Gaudreau D, Laforce R, Castonguay M, Bédard PJ, Bédard F, et al. Role of the striatum, cerebellum, and frontal lobes in the learning of a visuomotor sequence. Brain Cogn. 1997;34: 218–45.
    1. Doyon J, Laforce R, Bouchard G, Gaudreau D, Roy J, Poirier M, et al. Role of the striatum, cerebellum and frontal lobes in the automatization of a repeated visuomotor sequence of movements. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36: 625–41.
    1. Agostino R, Currà A, Soldati G, Dinapoli L, Chiacchiari L, Modugno N, et al. Prolonged practice is of scarce benefit in improving motor performance in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2004;19: 1285–93.
    1. Wu T, Hallett M. A functional MRI study of automatic movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2005;128: 2250–9.
    1. Lehericy S, Benali H, Van de Moortele PF, Pelegrini-Issac M, Waechter T, Ugurbil K, et al. Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 12566–12571.
    1. Kish SJ, Shannak K, Hornykiewicz O. Uneven pattern of dopamine loss in the striatum of patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Pathophysiologic and clinical implications. N Engl J Med. 1988;318: 876–80.
    1. Middleton FA, Strick PL. Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits. Brain Res Rev. 2000;31: 236–50.
    1. Fearnley JM, Lees AJ. Ageing and Parkinson’s disease: substantia nigra regional selectivity. Brain. 1991;114: 2283–301.
    1. Marsden CD. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 1990;335: 948–52.
    1. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rüb U, de Vos RAI, Jansen Steur ENH, Braak E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24: 197–211.
    1. Braak H, Bohl JR, Müller CM, Rüb U, de Vos RAI, Del Tredici K. Stanley Fahn Lecture 2005: The staging procedure for the inclusion body pathology associated with sporadic Parkinson’s disease reconsidered. Mov Disord. 2006;21: 2042–51.
    1. Siderowf A, Lang AE. Premotor Parkinson’s disease: concepts and definitions. Mov Disord. 2012;27: 608–16. 10.1002/mds.24954
    1. Marek KL, Seibyl JP, Zoghbi SS, Zea-Ponce Y, Baldwin RM, Fussell B, et al. [123I] beta-CIT/SPECT imaging demonstrates bilateral loss of dopamine transporters in hemi-Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 1996;46: 231–7.
    1. Tessa C, Diciotti S, Lucetti C, Baldacci F, Cecchi P, Giannelli M, et al. fMRI changes in cortical activation during task performance with the unaffected hand partially reverse after ropinirole treatment in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19: 265–8. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.07.018
    1. Schwarz J, Linke R, Kerner M, Mozley PD, Trenkwalder C, Gasser T, et al. Striatal dopamine transporter binding assessed by [I-123]IPT and single photon emission computed tomography in patients with early Parkinson’s disease: implications for a preclinical diagnosis. Arch Neurol. 2000;57: 205–8.
    1. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. Elsevier; 1971;9: 97–113.
    1. Cockrell JR, Folstein MF. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24: 689–92.
    1. Williams JR, Hirsch ES, Anderson K, Bush AL, Goldstein SR, Grill S, et al. A comparison of nine scales to detect depression in Parkinson disease: which scale to use? Neurology. 2012;78: 998–1006. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824d587f
    1. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17: 37–49.
    1. Jankovic J, Kapadia AS. Functional decline in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58: 1611–5.
    1. Doyon J, Korman M, Morin A, Dostie V, Tahar A, Benali H, et al. Contribution of night and day sleep vs. simple passage of time to the consolidation of motor sequence and visuomotor adaptation learning. Exp Brain Res. 2009;195: 15–26. 10.1007/s00221-009-1748-y
    1. Robertson EM, Pascual-Leone A, Miall RC. Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5: 576–582.
    1. Korman M, Doyon J, Doljansky J, Carrier J, Dagan Y, Karni A. Daytime sleep condenses the time course of motor memory consolidation. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10: 1206–1213.
    1. Miyachi S, Hikosaka O, Lu X. Differential activation of monkey striatal neurons in the early and late stages of procedural learning. Exp Brain Res. 2002;146: 122–6.
    1. Miyachi S, Hikosaka O, Miyashita K, Kárádi Z, Rand MK. Differential roles of monkey striatum in learning of sequential hand movement. Exp Brain Res. 1997;115: 1–5.
    1. Nahmias C, Garnett ES, Firnau G, Lang A. Striatal dopamine distribution in parkinsonian patients during life. J Neurol Sci. 1985;69: 223–30.
    1. Penhune VB, Doyon J. Dynamic cortical and subcortical networks in learning and delayed recall of timed motor sequences. J Neurosci. 2002;22: 1397–1406.
    1. Marsden CD, Obeso JA. The functions of the basal ganglia and the paradox of stereotaxic surgery in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 1994;117: 877–897.
    1. King BR, Fogel SM, Albouy G, Doyon J. Neural correlates of the age-related changes in motor sequence learning and motor adaptation in older adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7: 142 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00142
    1. Wilson JK, Baran B, Pace-Schott EF, Ivry RB, Spencer RMC. Sleep modulates word-pair learning but not motor sequence learning in healthy older adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33: 991–1000. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.06.029
    1. Spencer RMC, Gouw AM, Ivry RB. Age-related decline of sleep-dependent consolidation. Learn Mem. 2007;14: 480–484.
    1. Brown RM, Robertson EM, Press DZ. Sequence skill acquisition and off-line learning in normal aging. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2009;4: e6683.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться