Secondary Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety Trial Data of the Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine in Children and Adolescents in Colombia

Humberto Reynales, Gabriel Carrasquilla, Betzana Zambrano, Margarita Cortés S, Tifany Machabert, Jin Jing, Sophie Pallardy, Owen Haney, Martha Faccini, Juliana Quintero, Fernando Noriega, Humberto Reynales, Gabriel Carrasquilla, Betzana Zambrano, Margarita Cortés S, Tifany Machabert, Jin Jing, Sophie Pallardy, Owen Haney, Martha Faccini, Juliana Quintero, Fernando Noriega

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of the recombinant, live, attenuated, tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) against virologically-confirmed dengue (VCD) has been documented in a phase 3 trial in Latin America (CYD15, NCT01374516). This is a descriptive secondary analysis of the efficacy and safety of CYD-TDV in participants from Colombia.

Methods: Data from 9740 Colombian participants 9-16 years of age who were randomized 2:1 to receive CYD-TDV or placebo were assessed to describe the vaccine efficacy of CYD-TDV against VCD and severe VCD. Estimation was made of the relative risk (RR) for hospitalized VCD cases and severe hospitalized VCD cases after the first dose of CYD-TDV, as well as a description of the incidence of hospitalized dengue from the start of the study and per year of the study until study completion.

Results: During the active phase of the trial in Colombia, the efficacy of CYD-TDV was 67.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 58.3-74.7] against symptomatic VCD due to any serotype from injection 1 (month 0) to 25 months postinjection 1. Over 6 years, the RR across all 4 serotypes was 0.166 (95% CI: 0.09-0.29) in hospitalized VCD patients and 0.154 (95% CI: 0.04-0.50) in patients with severe hospitalized VCD.

Conclusions: Analysis of the data from Colombia mimics the efficacy observed in CYD15 during the active surveillance follow-up (25 months), but with a sustained beneficial RR for dengue hospitalizations on the subsequent years of follow-up. In Colombia, where seroprevalence has been demonstrated to be high in several regions of the country, CYD-TDV is a useful tool to consider as part of an integrated control strategy against endemic dengue, a disease with a high economic impact on the health system.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Vaccine efficacy against symptomatic VCD due to any of the 4 serotypes by study phase and dengue serostatus at baseline in Colombia. Serostatus determined by PRNT (measured or imputed) at Month 0. n and N are average numbers from 10 iterations of multiple imputations. Study group classified as randomized (Subjects classified according to the injection assigned at randomization). N indicates total number of subjects selected in sub-cohort; n, number of subjects fulfilling the item listed; N/A, not available.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Risk of dengue hospitalization occurring after Month 0 by time period, in participants who were seropositive (A) or seronegative (B) at baseline in Colombia. Serostatus determined by PRNT (measured or imputed) at Month 0. n and N are average numbers from 10 iterations of multiple imputations. Study group as treated (Subjects classified as CYD-TDV group if received at least 1 injection of CYD-TDV vaccine). Beyond Year 2 Hospital phase means until the end of the study. N indicates total number of subjets selected in sub-cohort; n, number of subjects fulfilling the item listed.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Vaccine efficacy against symptomatic VCD between doses in participants who were seropositive (A) or seronegative (B) at baseline in Colombia. Serostatus Determined By Prnt (Measured Or Imputed) At Month 0 In A Subcohort Of Participants. N And N Are Average Numbers From 10 Iterations Of Multiple Imputations. Study Group Classified As Randomized (Subjects Classified According To The Injection Assigned At Randomization). Eap Indicates End Of The Active Phase; N: Total Number Of Subjets Selected In Sub-Cohort; N, Number Of Subjects Fulfilling The Item Listed.

References

    1. Castrillón JC, Castaño JC, Urcuqui S. [Dengue in Colombia: ten years of database records]. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2015;32:142–149.
    1. Masyeni S, Yohan B, Somia IKA, et al. Dengue infection in international travellers visiting Bali, Indonesia. J Travel Med. 2018;25.
    1. Riddell A, Babiker ZO. Imported dengue fever in East London: a 6-year retrospective observational study. J Travel Med. 2017;24.
    1. Halstead S, Wilder-Smith A. Severe dengue in travellers: pathogenesis, risk and clinical management. J Travel Med. 2019;26.
    1. Jentes ES, Lash RR, Johansson MA, et al. Evidence-based risk assessment and communication: a new global dengue-risk map for travellers and clinicians. J Travel Med. 2016;23.
    1. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Casos Reportados de Dengue en las Americas: Pan American Health Organization. Available at: .
    1. Instituto Nacional De Salud. Epidemiological week number 51, 2013. Boletín Epidemiológico Semanal 2013. Available at: .
    1. Instituto Nacional De Salud. Epidemiological week number 52, 2014. Boletín Epidemiológico Semanal 2014. Available at: .
    1. Instituto Nacional De Salud. Epidemiological week number 52, 2015. Boletín Epidemiológico Semanal 2015. Available at: .
    1. Instituto Nacional De Salud. Epidemiological week number 52, 2016. Boletín Epidemiológico Semanal 2016. Available at: .
    1. Instituto Nacional De Salud. Epidemiological week number 52, 2017. Boletín Epidemiológico Semanal 2017. Available at: .
    1. Villar LA, Rojas DP, Besada-Lombana S, et al. Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Colombia (2000-2011): a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003499.
    1. Mattar S, Morales V, Cassab A, et al. Effect of climate variables on dengue incidence in a tropical Caribbean municipality of Colombia, Cerete, 2003-2008. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17:e358–e359.
    1. Instituto Nacional de Salud DdVyAdreSP. Boletín Epidemiológico Semanal 2019. Available at: .
    1. Londoño-Rentería B, Cárdenas JC, Giovanni JE, et al. Aedes aegypti anti-salivary gland antibody concentration and dengue virus exposure history in healthy individuals living in an endemic area in Colombia. Biomedica. 2015;35:572–581.
    1. Dayan G, Arredondo JL, Carrasquilla G, et al. Prospective cohort study with active surveillance for fever in four dengue endemic countries in Latin America. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:18–23.
    1. Jiménez MM, Arias J, Carrasquilla G. Seroprevalence of dengue infection in the municipalities of Armenia, Calarcá, La Tebaida and Montenegro in Quindío, 2014. Biomedica. 2017;37:34–41.
    1. Velandia-Romero ML, Coronel-Ruiz C, Castro-Bonilla L, et al. Prevalence of dengue antibodies in healthy children and adults in different Colombian endemic areas. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;91:9–16.
    1. Castro Rodríguez R, Carrasquilla G, Porras A, et al. The burden of dengue and the financial cost to Colombia, 2010-2012. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94:1065–1072.
    1. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Estrategia de Gestión Integrada para la prevención y control del dengue en la Región de las Américas 2017 July 2018. Available at: .
    1. Villar L, Dayan GH, Arredondo-García JL, et al. ; CYD15 Study Group. Efficacy of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in children in Latin America. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:113–123.
    1. Sridhar S, Luedtke A, Langevin E, et al. Effect of dengue serostatus on dengue vaccine safety and efficacy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:327–340.
    1. Barlow WE. Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design. Biometrics. 1994;50:1064–1072.
    1. Prentice R. A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika. 1986;73:1–11.
    1. Rubin D. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponsein Surveys. 1987New York: John Wiley.
    1. Dengue vaccine: WHO position paper – September 2018. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2018;93:457–76.
    1. Dengue vaccine: WHO position paper, september 2018 – recommendations. Vaccine. 2019;37:4848–9.
    1. Carabali M, Lim JK, Velez DC, et al. Dengue virus serological prevalence and seroconversion rates in children and adults in Medellin, Colombia: implications for vaccine introduction. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;58:27–36.
    1. L’Azou M, Assoukpa J, Fanouillere K, et al. Dengue seroprevalence: data from the clinical development of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in 14 countries (2005-2014). Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018;112:158–168.
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Smith PG, Luo R, et al. Pre-vaccination screening strategies for the use of the CYD-TDV dengue vaccine: a meeting report. Vaccine. 2019;37:5137–5146.
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Hombach J, Ferguson N, et al. Deliberations of the Strategic Advisory Group of experts on immunization on the use of CYD-TDV dengue vaccine. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:e31–e38.
    1. Flasche S, Smith PG. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for a rapid dengue test. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:465–466.
    1. Luo R, Fongwen N, Kelly-Cirino C, et al. Rapid diagnostic tests for determining dengue serostatus: a systematic review and key informant interviews. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:659–666.
    1. Bonaparte M, Zheng L, Garg S, et al. Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests and conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to determine prior dengue infection. J Travel Med. 2019.
    1. Sanofi Pasteur. DENGVAXIA®: Full Prescribing Information 2019 December 2019. Available at: .
    1. Wilder-Smith A. Serostatus-dependent performance of the first licensed dengue vaccine: implications for travellers. Journal of Travel Medicine. 2018;25.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться