The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research

Jonas F Ludvigsson, Petra Otterblad-Olausson, Birgitta U Pettersson, Anders Ekbom, Jonas F Ludvigsson, Petra Otterblad-Olausson, Birgitta U Pettersson, Anders Ekbom

Abstract

Swedish health care and national health registers are dependent on the presence of a unique identifier. This paper describes the Swedish personal identity number (PIN) and explores ethical issues of its use in medical research. A ten-digit-PIN is maintained by the National Tax Board for all individuals that have resided in Sweden since 1947. Until January 2008, an estimated 75,638 individuals have changed PIN. The most common reasons for change of PIN are incorrect recording of date of birth or sex among immigrants or newborns. Although uncommon, change of sex always leads to change of PIN since the PIN is sex-specific. The most common reasons for re-use of PIN (n = 15,887), is when immigrants are assigned a PIN that has previously been assigned to someone else. This is sometimes necessary since there is a shortage of certain PIN combinations referring to dates of birth in the 1950s and 1960s. Several ethical issues can be raised pro and con the use of PIN in medical research. The Swedish PIN is a useful tool for linkages between medical registers and allows for virtually 100% coverage of the Swedish health care system. We suggest that matching of registers through PIN and matching of national health registers without the explicit approval of the individual patient is to the benefit for both the individual patient and for society.

Conflict of interest statement

JFL, AE—None.

POO is employed at the National Board of Health and Welfare.

BP is employed at the National Tax Board.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Calculation of the check digit of the PIN. Each digit in the PIN is multiplied by 2 or 1 in alternating fashion. The products are summed up, but products consisting of two digits (*) are first summed up themselves (i.e. 12 = 1 + 2 = 3). In this case, the sum of products treated this way, is 36. # The last digit in the product sum (in this case 6) is extracted from 10 (the difference being “4”). If the product sum ends with “0” (e.g. 10, 20, 30, 40 etc.), the check digit “0” is assigned since “10” cannot function as the check digit
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Potential linkage between different registers involving patient identification from the National Board of Health and Welfare. ICD International Classification of Disease Code. (Used in the paper “A population-based study of coeliac disease, neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases” [9]). NBHW National Board of Health and Welfare. SS Statistics Sweden
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Linkage of own data. * Data collected by the researcher. # Matched controls identified by Statistics Sweden (Box 1). SS Statistics Sweden (Statistiska Centralbyrån, SCB). NBHW National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen)

References

    1. Johannesson I. The total population register of statistics Sweden. New possibilities and better quality. Örebro: Statistics Sweden; 2002.
    1. Lunde AS, Lundeborg S, Lettenstrom GS, Thygesen L, Huebner J. The person-number systems of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Israel. Vital Health Stat. 1980;2(84):1–59.
    1. Personnummer och samordningsnummer. SOU 2008:60. (Personal identity number and coordination number). In: Finance Do. Stockholm: Department of Finance; 2008.
    1. Andersson RE, Olaison G, Tysk C, Ekbom A. Appendectomy and protection against ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):808–814. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441104.
    1. Ludvigsson JF, Montgomery SM, Ekbom A. Risk of pancreatitis in 14,000 individuals with celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(11):1347–1353. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.06.002.
    1. Hjern A, Lindblad F, Vinnerljung B. Suicide, psychiatric illness, and social maladjustment in intercountry adoptees in Sweden: a cohort study. Lancet. 2002;360(9331):443–448. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09674-5.
    1. Pettersson A, Akre O, Richiardi L, Ekbom A, Kaijser M. Maternal smoking and the epidemic of testicular cancer—a nested case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(9):2044–2046. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22523.
    1. Pukkala E, Andersen A, Berglund G, Gislefoss R, Gudnason V, Hallmans G, Jellum E, Jousilahti P, Knekt P, Koskela P, Kyyronen PP, Lenner P, Luostarinen T, Love A, Ogmundsdottir H, Stattin P, Tenkanen L, Tryggvadottir L, Virtamo J, Wadell G, Widell A, Lehtinen M, Dillner J. Nordic biological specimen banks as basis for studies of cancer causes and control–more than 2 million sample donors, 25 million person years and 100,000 prospective cancers. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(3):286–307. doi: 10.1080/02841860701203545.
    1. Ludvigsson JF, Olsson T, Ekbom A, Montgomery SM. A population-based study of coeliac disease, neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(11):1317–1327.
    1. Personnummer—dess konstruktion och hantering inom Statistiska Centralbyrån. (Personal identity number—its design and use at Statistics Sweden). Statistics Sweden, Background Facts, Population and Welfare Statistics: Örebro; 2007.
    1. Socialstyrelsens allmänna råd. Medicinsk åldersutredning av invandrarbarn och adoptivbarn. SOSFS 1993:11. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare (Gunnar Fahlberg); 1993.
    1. Personnummeret i CPR-systemet Copenhagen. Det Centrale Personregister; 2008.
    1. Kaijser M, Akre O, Cnattingius S, Ekbom A. Preterm birth, low birth weight, and risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(3):607–609. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.049.
    1. Ludvigsson JF, Wahlstrom J, Grunewald J, Ekbom A, Montgomery SM. Coeliac disease and risk of tuberculosis: a population based cohort study. Thorax. 2007;62(1):23–28. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.059451.
    1. Ye W, Lagergren J, Weiderpass E, Nyren O, Adami HO, Ekbom A. Alcohol abuse and the risk of pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2002;51(2):236–239. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.2.236.
    1. Cnattingius S, Akre O, Lambe M, Ockene J, Granath F. Will an adverse pregnancy outcome influence the risk of continued smoking in the next pregnancy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1680–6.
    1. Johnsson L, Hansson MG, Eriksson S, Helgesson G. Patients’ refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2008;337:a345. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a345.
    1. Hansson MG. For the safety and benefit of current and future patients. Pathobiology. 2007;74(4):198–205. doi: 10.1159/000104445.
    1. Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ. 1994;309(6948):184–188.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться