Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study

Girijesh Prasad, Pawel Herman, Damien Coyle, Suzanne McDonough, Jacqueline Crosbie, Girijesh Prasad, Pawel Herman, Damien Coyle, Suzanne McDonough, Jacqueline Crosbie

Abstract

Background: There is now sufficient evidence that using a rehabilitation protocol involving motor imagery (MI) practice in conjunction with physical practice (PP) of goal-directed rehabilitation tasks leads to enhanced functional recovery of paralyzed limbs among stroke sufferers. It is however difficult to confirm patient engagement during an MI in the absence of any on-line measure. Fortunately an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) can provide an on-line measure of MI activity as a neurofeedback for the BCI user to help him/her focus better on the MI task. However initial performance of novice BCI users may be quite moderate and may cause frustration. This paper reports a pilot study in which a BCI system is used to provide a computer game-based neurofeedback to stroke participants during the MI part of a protocol.

Methods: The participants included five chronic hemiplegic stroke sufferers. Participants received up to twelve 30-minute MI practice sessions (in conjunction with PP sessions of the same duration) on 2 days a week for 6 weeks. The BCI neurofeedback performance was evaluated based on the MI task classification accuracy (CA) rate. A set of outcome measures including action research arm test (ARAT) and grip strength (GS), was made use of in assessing the upper limb functional recovery. In addition, since stroke sufferers often experience physical tiredness, which may influence the protocol effectiveness, their fatigue and mood levels were assessed regularly.

Results: Positive improvement in at least one of the outcome measures was observed in all the participants, while improvements approached a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the ARAT. The on-line CA of MI induced sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) modulation patterns in the form of lateralized event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (ERS) effects, for novice participants was in a moderate range of 60-75% within the limited 12 training sessions. The ERD/ERS change from the first to the last session was statistically significant for only two participants.

Conclusions: Overall the crucial observation is that the moderate BCI classification performance did not impede the positive rehabilitation trends as quantified with the rehabilitation outcome measures adopted in this study. Therefore it can be concluded that the BCI supported MI is a feasible intervention as part of a post-stroke rehabilitation protocol combining both PP and MI practice of rehabilitation tasks. Although these findings are promising, the scope of the final conclusions is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a control group.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An illustration of a Brain-Computer Interface: (a) Main components of a BCI. (b) Timings of a ball-basket game paradigm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A Type-2 Fuzzy Classifier: (a) A two-dimensional cluster in the feature space and the corresponding T1 fuzzy rule. (b) Footprint of a Gaussian interval type-2 fuzzy set with uncertain mean m∈[m1,m2]. (c) Illustrative comparison of a one-rule T2FLS and T1FLS-based classifiers (Δm and Δc define the initial bounds of uncertainty modeled in the system. (d) Structure of a sample T2 fuzzy rule base (the domain of the antecedents' membership functions is normalised).
Figure 3
Figure 3
BCI Classification accuracies over the feedback sessions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Quantification of synchronized/desynchronized EEG activity within the adjusted μ and β bands over 12 recording sessions for all participants: a) ERD/ERSμ(C3L)ERD/ERSμ(C4L), ERD/ERSμ(C3R) and ERD/ERSμ(C4R) b) ERD/ERSβ(C3L), ERD/ERSμ(C4L), ERD/ERSβ(C3R), and ERD/ERSβ(C4R). The ratios in the μ band are represented as ERD/ERSμ(xy) and that in the β band as ERD/ERSβ(xy), where x may denote the EEG channels C3 or C4 and y may denote either left upper limb MI (L) or right upper limb MI (R).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Recording of rehabilitation outcome measures with respect to time-points wi_j, where i represents the week and j represents the session number: (a) Motricity Index score (/100). (b) ARAT Score (/57). (c) NHPT Score (/6). (d) Grip strength (lbs.).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Monitoring of Fatigue: (a) Visual analog scores (VAS) for fatigue plotted with respect to time-points wi_j, where i represents the week and j the session number. (b) Dependency between CA results and fatigue VAS-plot of the subject-wise CA percentile rank (inter-subject mean with standard deviation) matched with fatigue VAS quartiles (i.e. inter-quartile ranges). (c) Dependency between CA results and fatigue VAS-plot of the inter-subject variance of subject-wise CA percentile ranks matched with fatigue VAS quartiles (i.e. inter-quartile ranges).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Monitoring of Mood: (a) Visual analog scores (VAS) for mood plotted with respect to time-points wi_j, where i represents the week and j the session number. (b) Dependency between CA results and mood VAS-plot of the subject-wise CA percentile rank (inter-subject mean with standard deviation) matched with mood VAS quartiles (i.e. inter-quartile ranges).

References

    1. World Health Organization: Global Report. 2002. [Last accessed on 13 January 2007]
    1. Crosbie JH, McDonough SM, Gilmore DH, Wiggam MI. The adjunctive role of mental practice in the rehabilitation of the upper limb after hemiplegic stroke: a pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2004;18:60–68. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr702oa.
    1. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Mental Practice in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2007;38(4):1293–1297. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000260205.67348.2b.
    1. Dickstein R, Deutsch JE. Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2007;87(7):942–53. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060331.
    1. Braun S, Kleynen M, Schols J, Schack T, Beurskens A, Wade D. Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a framework. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(7):579–91. doi: 10.1177/0269215508090066.
    1. Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C. Motor imagery and direct brain computer communication Proc. IEEE. 2001;89(7):1123–34. doi: 10.1109/5.939829.
    1. Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2002;113:767–91. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3.
    1. Guger G, Edlinge G, Harkam W, Niedermayer I, Pfurtschelle G. How Many People are Able to Operate an EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)? IEEE Trans Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2003;11(2):145–147. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814481.
    1. Neuper. et al.Enhancement of Left Right Senorimotor EEG Differences During Feedback Regulated Motor Imagery. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 1999;16(4):373–382. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199907000-00010.
    1. Meng F, Tong K, Chan S, Wong W, Lui K, Tang K, Gao S. BCI-FES Training System Design and Implementation for Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients. Proceedings of the IJCNN. 2008. pp. 4102–4105.
    1. Mohapp A, Scherer R, Keinrath C, Grieshofer P, Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C. Single-trial EEG Classification of Executed and Imagined Hand Movements in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients. Proceedings of the 3rd Intl. BCI Workshop & Training Course, Graz. 2006. pp. 80–81.
    1. Ang KK, A clinical evaluation of non-invasive motor imagery-based brain-computer interface in stroke. Proceedings of the IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. Conf., 2008. 2008. pp. 4178–81.
    1. Ang KK, A clinical evaluation on the spatial patterns of non-invasive motor imagery-based brain-computer interface in stroke. Proceedings of the IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. Conf., 2008. 2008. pp. 4174–7.
    1. Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, Braun C, Dimyan MA, Ard T, Mellinge J, Caria A, Soekadar S, Fourkas A, Birbaumer N. Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:910–917. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505313.
    1. Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age and Ageing. 1972;1:233–238. doi: 10.1093/ageing/1.4.233.
    1. Bhavani G, Cockburn J, Lincoln N. The reliability of the Rivermead Assessment and implications for some commonly used assessments of perception. British Journal of Occupational Therap. 1983;46:17–19.
    1. Weiss T, Hansen E, Beyer L. Activation processes during mental practice in stroke patients. Int J Psychophys. 1994;17:91–100. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(94)90059-0.
    1. Crosbie JH, Lennon S, Basford JR, McDonough SM. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real. Disability & Rehabilitation. 2007;29(14):1139–1146.
    1. McFarland DJ, Miner LA, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. Mu and Beta topographies during motor imagery and actual movements. Brain Topography. 2000;12(3):177–186. doi: 10.1023/A:1023437823106.
    1. Coyle DH, Prasad G, McGinnity TM. A time-frequency approach to feature extraction for a brain-computer interface with a comparative analysis of performance measures. EURASIP Journal of Applied Signal Processing. 2005;2005(19):3141–3151. doi: 10.1155/ASP.2005.3141.
    1. Herman P, Prasad G, McGinnity TM, Coyle DH. Comparative analysis of spectral approaches to feature extraction for EEG-based motor imagery classification. IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2008;16(4):317–326. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2008.926694.
    1. Herman P, Prasad G, McGinnity TM. Design and on-line evaluation of type-2 fuzzy logic system-based framework for handling uncertainties in BCI classification. Proc of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference 2008, Vancouver, Canada;
    1. Herman P, Prasad G, McGinnity TM. Designing a Robust Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Classifier for Non-stationary Systems with Application in Brain-Computer Interfacing. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC 2008), Suntec Singapore. 2008.
    1. Mendel JM. Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions. Prentice-Hall, USA; 2001.
    1. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaya E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. European Neurology. 1980;19:382–389. doi: 10.1159/000115178.
    1. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–492. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001.
    1. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res. 1985;5:24–38.
    1. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:69–72.
    1. Glader E-L, Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Poststroke Fatigue: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study of Stroke Patients in Sweden. Stroke. 2002;33:1327–1333. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000014248.28711.D6.
    1. Van der Lee JH, Wagennaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomised clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369–2375.
    1. Hellar A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewar RL, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:714–719. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.6.714.
    1. Dittnera AJ, Wesselyb SC, Brown RG. The assessment of fatigue: A practical guide for clinicians and researchers. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2004;56:157–170. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00371-4.
    1. Shahid S, Sinha RK, Prasad G. Mu and beta rhythm modulations in motor imagery related post-stroke EEG: a study under BCI framework for post-stroke rehabilitation. BMC Neuroscience. 2010;11(Suppl 1):P127.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться