Efficacy and Safety of Febuxostat Extended and Immediate Release in Patients With Gout and Renal Impairment: A Phase III Placebo-Controlled Study

Kenneth G Saag, Michael A Becker, Andrew Whelton, Barbara Hunt, Majin Castillo, Krisztina Kisfalvi, Lhanoo Gunawardhana, Kenneth G Saag, Michael A Becker, Andrew Whelton, Barbara Hunt, Majin Castillo, Krisztina Kisfalvi, Lhanoo Gunawardhana

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of febuxostat extended release (XR) and immediate release (IR) in patients with gout and normal or impaired renal function.

Methods: This was a 3-month, phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients (n = 1,790) with a history of gout and normal or impaired (mild-to-severe) renal function were randomized to receive placebo, febuxostat IR 40 or 80 mg, or febuxostat XR 40 or 80 mg once daily (1:1:1:1:1 ratio). End points included proportions of patients with a serum urate (UA) level of <5.0 mg/dl at month 3 (primary end point), a serum UA level of <6.0 mg/dl at month 3, and ≥1 gout flare requiring treatment over 3 months (secondary end points).

Results: Both febuxostat formulations led to significantly greater proportions of patients achieving a serum UA level of <5.0 mg/dl or <6.0 mg/dl at month 3 (P < 0.001 for all comparisons versus placebo). Equivalent doses of febuxostat XR and IR had similar treatment effects on serum UA level end points; however, a significantly greater proportion of patients achieved a serum UA level of <5.0 mg/dl with XR 40 mg versus IR 40 mg. Similar proportions of patients experienced ≥1 gout flare across treatment groups. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were low and evenly distributed between treatment arms. A preplanned subgroup analysis demonstrated that febuxostat formulations were well tolerated and generally effective on serum UA level end points (versus placebo) across all renal function subgroups.

Conclusion: Both formulations of febuxostat (XR and IR) were well tolerated and effective in patients with gout and normal or impaired renal function, including patients with severe renal impairment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02139046.

© 2018 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. Subgroup numbers are from the full analysis set. In the safety analysis set, 1 patient was randomized to receive placebo but received febuxostat (FBX) immediate release (IR) 40 mg and so was included in the FBX IR 40 mg group. All patients received prophylaxis for gout flares over the 3‐month double‐blind treatment period. QD = once daily; XR = extended release.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of patients (in full analysis set) who achieved primary and secondary outcomes. Based on multiplicity adjustment, the level of significance was set at P < 0.025 for primary comparisons. * = P < 0.001 versus placebo. † = P = 0.001 versus equivalent‐dose immediate release (IR) formulation. FBX = febuxostat; XR = extended release.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Renal subgroup analysis, with treatment group comparisons were based on the Cui, Hung, and Wang Z test statistic. A, Percentage of patients who achieved a serum urate (sUA) level of <5.0 mg/dl (primary end point) at month 3. * = P < 0.05 versus placebo; † = P < 0.05 versus equivalent‐dose immediate release (IR) formulation. B, Percentage of patients who achieved a serum UA level of <6.0 mg/dl at month 3. * = P ≤ 0.001 versus placebo; † = P < 0.05 versus equivalent‐dose IR formulation. C, Percentage of patients who experienced ≥1 gout flare that required treatment over the 3‐month study period. * = P < 0.05 versus placebo. Patients were stratified by baseline renal function; normal renal function was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥90 ml/minute, mild renal impairment as an eGFR of ≥60–89 ml/minute, moderate renal impairment as an eGFR of ≥30–59 ml/minute, and severe renal impairment as an eGFR of ≥15–29 ml/minute. FBX = febuxostat; XR = extended release.

References

    1. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2008. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:3136–41.
    1. Hsu CY, Iribarren C, McCulloch CE, Darbinian J, Go AS. Risk factors for end‐stage renal disease: 25‐year follow‐up. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:342–50.
    1. Iseki K, Oshiro S, Tozawa M, Iseki C, Ikemiya Y, Takishita S. Significance of hyperuricemia on the early detection of renal failure in a cohort of screened subjects. Hypertens Res 2001;24:691–7.
    1. Kang DH, Nakagawa T. Uric acid and chronic renal disease: possible implication of hyperuricemia on progression of renal disease. Semin Nephrol 2005;25:43–9.
    1. Obermayr RP, Temml C, Gutjahr G, Knechtelsdorfer M, Oberbauer R, Klauser‐Braun R. Elevated uric acid increases the risk for kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;19:2407–13.
    1. Sonoda H, Takase H, Dohi Y, Kimura G. Uric acid levels predict future development of chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol 2011;33:352–7.
    1. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Comorbidities of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: NHANES 2007‐2008. Am J Med 2012;125:679–87.
    1. Krishnan E. Reduced glomerular function and prevalence of gout: NHANES 2009‐10. PLoS One 2012;7:e50046.
    1. Roughley MJ, Belcher J, Mallen CD, Roddy E. Gout and risk of chronic kidney disease and nephrolithiasis: meta‐analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Res Ther 2015;17:90.
    1. Zyloprim (allopurinol) product monograph. Vaughan (ON): AA Pharma Inc.; 2010. URL: .
    1. Khanna D, Fitzgerald JD, Khanna PP, Bae S, Singh MK, Neogi T, et al. 2012. American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:1431–46.
    1. Saag KG, Whelton A, Becker MA, MacDonald P, Hunt B, Gunawardhana L. Impact of febuxostat on renal function in gout patients with moderate‐to‐severe renal impairment. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:2035–43.
    1. Uloric (febuxostat) prescribing information. Deerfield (IL): Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. 2013. URL: .
    1. Hande KR, Noone RM, Stone WJ. Severe allopurinol toxicity: description and guidelines for prevention in patients with renal insufficiency. Am J Med 1984;76:47–56.
    1. Thurston MM, Phillips BB, Bourg CA. Safety and efficacy of allopurinol in chronic kidney disease. Ann Pharmacother 2013;47:1507–16.
    1. Stamp LK, Chapman PT, Barclay ML, Horne A, Frampton C, Tan P, et al. A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of allopurinol dose escalation to achieve target serum urate in people with gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1522–8.
    1. Becker MA, Schumacher HR Jr, Wortmann RL, MacDonald PA, Palo WA, Eustace D, et al. Febuxostat, a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase: a twenty‐eight–day, multicenter, phase II, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐response clinical trial examining safety and efficacy in patients with gout. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:916–23.
    1. Becker MA, Schumacher HR Jr, Wortmann RL, MacDonald PA, Eustace D, Palo WA, et al. Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia and gout. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2450–61.
    1. Becker MA, Schumacher HR, MacDonald PA, Lloyd E, Lademacher C. Clinical efficacy and safety of successful longterm urate lowering with febuxostat or allopurinol in subjects with gout. J Rheumatol 2009;36:1273–82.
    1. Becker MA, Schumacher HR, Espinoza LR, Wells AF, MacDonald P, Lloyd E, et al. The urate‐lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat in the treatment of the hyperuricemia of gout: the CONFIRMS trial. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12:R63.
    1. Schumacher HR Jr, Becker MA, Wortmann RL, MacDonald PA, Hunt B, Streit J, et al. Effects of febuxostat versus allopurinol and placebo in reducing serum urate in subjects with hyperuricemia and gout: a 28‐week, phase III, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group trial. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1540–8.
    1. Schumacher HR Jr, Becker MA, Lloyd E, MacDonald PA, Lademacher C. Febuxostat in the treatment of gout: 5‐yr findings of the FOCUS efficacy and safety study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:188–94.
    1. Febuxostat: study number. TMX‐67_106. Clinical study report. Deerfield (IL): Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc.; 2012. URL: .
    1. Gunawardhana L, Becker MA, Whelton A, Hunt B, Castillo M, Saag K. Efficacy and safety of febuxostat extended release and immediate release in patients with gout and moderate renal impairment: phase II placebo‐controlled study. Arthritis Res Ther 2018;20:99.
    1. Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, Decker JL, McCarty DJ, Yu TF. Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 1977;20:895–900.
    1. Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, Barskova V, Becce F, Castaneda‐Sanabria J, et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence‐based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:29–42.
    1. Whelton A, MacDonald PA, Zhao L, Hunt B, Gunawardhana L. Renal function in gout: long‐term treatment effects of febuxostat. J Clin Rheumatol 2011;17:7–13.
    1. Whelton A, MacDonald PA, Chefo S, Gunawardhana L. Preservation of renal function during gout treatment with febuxostat: a quantitative study. Postgrad Med 2013;125:106–14.
    1. Curiel RV, Guzman NJ. Challenges associated with the management of gouty arthritis in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2012;42:166–78.
    1. Dalbeth N, Kumar S, Stamp L, Gow P. Dose adjustment of allopurinol according to creatinine clearance does not provide adequate control of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. J Rheumatol 2006;33:1646–50.
    1. Sarawate CA, Brewer KK, Yang W, Patel PA, Schumacher HR, Saag KG, et al. Gout medication treatment patterns and adherence to standards of care from a managed care perspective. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:925–34.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться