Observations on significant hemodynamic changes caused by a high concentration of epidurally administered ropivacaine: correlation and prediction study of stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in thoracic epidural anesthesia

Jeong-Min Hong, Hyeon Jeong Lee, Young-Jae Oh, Ah Rhem Cho, Hyae Jin Kim, Do-Won Lee, Wang-Seok Do, Jae-Young Kwon, Haekyu Kim, Jeong-Min Hong, Hyeon Jeong Lee, Young-Jae Oh, Ah Rhem Cho, Hyae Jin Kim, Do-Won Lee, Wang-Seok Do, Jae-Young Kwon, Haekyu Kim

Abstract

Background: Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) exacerbates hypotension due to peripheral vasodilator effects following the use of general anesthetics. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic changes caused by three different concentrations of epidural ropivacaine and to evaluate the performance of the stroke-volume variation (SVV) and central venous pressure (CVP) during TEA with general anesthesia.

Methods: A total of 120 patients were administered 8 mL of ropivacaine solution via epidural injection, following randomization into one of three groups based on the concentration of ropivacaine in the study solution: 0.75%, 0.375%, or 0.2%. Hemodynamics were monitored for 30 min after loading. We analyzed the hemodynamic changes in the subgroups according to an age cutoff of 60 years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to characterize the relationship of the SVV, CVP, and a 20% decrease in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) following TEA.

Results: Data from 109 patients were analyzed. MAP and systemic vascular resistance index were significantly decreased, and SVV was significantly increased after epidural loading only in the 0.75% ropivacaine group. There was a significant difference in hemodynamics between young and elderly subgroups in the 0.75% ropivacaine group. SVV showed a negative correlation with MAP, whereas CVP showed no correlation. The ROC analysis of SVV demonstrated a weak predictive ability of a 20% decrease in MAP at 10 min after the loading dose, with an area-under-the-curve of 0.687 and a 9.5% optimal cutoff value (sensitivity, 60.6%; specificity, 68.9%).

Conclusions: A high concentration of ropivacaine through TEA caused a significant decrease in the systemic vascular resistance and blood pressure. More significant decreases were shown in the elderly patients. Though the change of SVV showed a negative correlation with hypotension and indicated functional hypovolemia after TEA, the predictability was limited.

Clinical trials registration: Number: NCT01559285 , date: January 24, 2013.

Keywords: Epidural administration; Epidural, local, ropivacaine; Stroke volume variability.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by IRB of the Yangsan Hospital of Pusan National University with the number 05–2011-054. The written informed consent was obtained from patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Hemodynamic changes following epidural administration of ropivacaine. MAP (P = 0.039) and SVRI (P = 0.026) were significantly decreased in 0.75% ropivacaine group compared with other groups. Concordant increase in SVV was remarkably increased in 0.75% group compared with 0.375% and 0.2% group through the study period (P = 0.017). * mean P < 0.05 compared with 0.2% group and † means P < 0.05 compared with 0.375% group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses to predict change of mean arterial blood pressure after thoracic epidural anesthesia. The AUC of SVV was 0.687 (95% CI, 0.587–0.787) whereas AUC of CVP (0.477 [95% CI, 0.369–0.584]). The performance to predict 20% change of mean arterial pressure was significantly different (P = 0.026). The optimal cutoff value of SVV to discriminate between responders and non-responders was 9.5% (sensitivity: 60.6%, specificity: 68.9%)

References

    1. Liu S, Carpenter RL, Neal JM. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:1474–1506. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199506000-00019.
    1. Steinbrook RA. Epidural anesthesia and gastrointestinal motility. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:837–844. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199804000-00029.
    1. Simeoforidou M, Vretzakis G, Bareka M, Chantzi E, Flossos A, Giannoukas A, Tsilimingas N. Thoracic epidural analgesia with levobupivacaine for 6 postoperative days attenuates sympathetic activation after thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:817–823. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.08.003.
    1. Shi WZ, Miao YL, Yakoob MY, Cao JB, Zhang H, Jiang YG, LH X, Mi WD. Recovery of gastrointestinal function with thoracic epidural vs. systemic analgesia following gastrointestinal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:923–932. doi: 10.1111/aas.12375.
    1. Veering BT, Cousins MJ. Cardiovascular and pulmonary effects of epidural anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;28:620–635.
    1. Whiteside R, Jones D, Bignell S, Lang C, Lo SK. Epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl following major gynaecological surgery: the effect of volume and concentration on pain relief and motor impairment. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:720–724. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013581.
    1. Dernedde M, Stadler M, Bardiau F, Boogaerts J. Comparison of different concentrations of levobupivacaine for post-operative epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47:884–890. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00182.x.
    1. Bromage PR. Mechanism of action of extradural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 1975;47(suppl):199–211.
    1. Ginosar Y, Weiniger CF, Kurz V, Babchenko A, Nitzan M, Davidson E. Sympathectomy-mediated vasodilatation: a randomized concentration ranging study of epidural bupivacaine. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:213–221. doi: 10.1007/s12630-008-9036-z.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Naropin (Ropivacaine HCL) injection. 2006. . Accessed 25 June 2017.
    1. Dernedde M, Stadler M, Bardiau F, Boogaerts JG. Comparison of 2 concentrations of levobupivacaine in postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. J Clin Anesth. 2005;17:531–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.01.007.
    1. Liu SS, Moore JM, Luo AM, Trautman WJ, Carpenter RL. Comparison of three solutions of ropivacaine/fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:727–733. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199903000-00014.
    1. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care. 2008;12:R82. doi: 10.1186/cc6933.
    1. Manecke GR, Jr, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:3–7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.08.004.
    1. Liu SS, Ware PD, Rajendran S. Effects of concentration and volume of 2-chloroprocaine on epidural anesthesia in volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:1288–1293. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199706000-00009.
    1. Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Anesth. 2011;25:904–916. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1217-1.
    1. Park WY, Hagins FM, Rivat EL, Macnamara TE. Age and epidural dose response in adult men. Anesthesiology. 1982;56:318–320. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198204000-00020.
    1. Wink J, Wolterbeek R, Aarts LP, Koster SC, Versteegh MI, Veering BT. Upper thoracic epidural anaesthesia: effects of age on neural blockade and cardiovascular parameters. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:767–775. doi: 10.1111/aas.12087.
    1. Holman SJ, Bosco RR, Kao TC, Mazzilli MA, Dietrich KJ, Rolain RA, Stevens RA. What constitutes an effective but safe initial dose of lidocaine to test a thoracic epidural catheter? Anesth Analg. 2001;93:749–754. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200109000-00040.
    1. Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R. Effect of age on extradural dose requirement in thoracic extradural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71:445–446. doi: 10.1093/bja/71.3.445.
    1. Kanonidou Z, Karystianou G. Anesthesia for the elderly. Hippokratia. 2007;11:175–177.
    1. Suehiro K, Okutani R. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:772–775. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.03.014.
    1. Xu Z, Zhang J, Xia Y, Deng X. Accuracy of pulse oximeter perfusion index in thoracic epidural anesthesia under basal general anesthesia. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:1728–1734.
    1. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988;240:1285–1293. doi: 10.1126/science.3287615.
    1. Hadian M, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients. J Crit Care. 2011;26:328. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.08.018.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться