Infant feeding modalities addressed in two different ways in Eastern Uganda

Ingunn Ms Engebretsen, Rebecca Shanmugam, A Elisabeth Sommerfelt, James K Tumwine, Thorkild Tylleskär, Ingunn Ms Engebretsen, Rebecca Shanmugam, A Elisabeth Sommerfelt, James K Tumwine, Thorkild Tylleskär

Abstract

Background: Durations of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and predominant breastfeeding (PBF) from two different assessments, among the same mother-infant population, were investigated to determine the degree to which the assessments yielded overlapping results.

Methods: Thirty Ugandan mother-infant pairs were followed up weekly from birth to three months of age with weekly short-time feeding recall: the 24-hour recall asked prior to the 1-week recall. In addition, at week 6 and 12 dietary recalls since-birth were conducted. Variables for the duration of EBF and PBF were created from the short-time feeding recalls and the dietary recalls since-birth, respectively. Mean durations of EBF and PBF from the two assessments were compared with Kaplan Meier analysis at week 6 and 12. Reproducibility of dietary recall instruments was also assessed.

Results: At six weeks postpartum the mean durations of EBF were 0.50 weeks (95% CI: 0, 1.02) according to the weekly short-time recalls and 1.51 weeks (95% CI: 0.66, 2.35) according to the recall since-birth (Mantel-Cox test, p = 0.049). The mean durations of PBF were 4.07 weeks (95% CI: 3.38, 4.77) according to the frequent short-time recalls and 4.50 weeks (95% CI: 3.93, 5.07) according to the recall since-birth, (Mantel-Cox-test, p = 0.82). At twelve weeks the mean durations of EBF were 0.5 weeks (95% CI: 0, 1.1) according to the weekly short-time recalls and 1.4 weeks (95% CI: 0.1, 2.7) according to the recall since-birth (Mantel-Cox-test, p = 0.15). The mean durations of PBF were 5.2 weeks (95% CI: 3.9, 6.5) according to the weekly short-time recalls and 6.6 weeks (95% CI: 5.4, 7.8) according to recall since-birth (Mantel-Cox-test, p = 0.20). Reports of feeding categories and early feeding practices showed high reproducibility.

Conclusion: Comparing duration of EBF and PBF in this group of mother-infant pairs showed overlapping results from the weekly short-time assessment and the recall since-birth at twelve weeks, with the latter yielding slightly longer duration of the respective feeding modalities. The retrospective recall since-birth could be assessed as a cost-reducing tool compared to the frequent follow-up addressing duration of respective infant feeding modalities for evaluation of programmes promoting safer infant feeding practices.

Trial registration: The study was part of formative studies for the ongoing study PROMISE EBF registered at https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00397150" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT00397150.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of short-time and 'since birth' dietary assessments for introduction of predominant breastfeeding (PBF), 6 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating proportion introducing water, water-based drinks, oral rehydration salts or fruit juices to breastfed infants (PBF) according to the frequent short-time recall, 24-hour recall and weekly 1-week recall (red) and recall 'since-birth' (blue) dietary assessments at six weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of short-time and 'since birth' dietary assessments for introduction of mixed feeding (MF), 6 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating proportion introducing milk and semi-solid feeds to breastfed infants (MF) according to the frequent short-time recall, 24-hour recall and weekly 1-week recall (red) and recall 'since-birth' (blue) dietary assessments at six weeks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of short-time and 'since birth' dietary assessments for introduction of predominant breastfeeding (PBF), 12 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating proportion introducing water, water-based drinks, oral rehydration salts or fruit juices to breastfed infants (PBF) according to the frequent short-time recall, 24-hour recall and weekly 1-week recall (red) and recall 'since-birth' (blue) dietary assessments at twelve weeks.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of short-time and since birth dietary assessments for introduction of mixed feeding (MF), 12 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating proportion introducing milk and semi-solid feeds to breastfed infants (MF) according to the frequent short-time recall, 24-hour recall and weekly 1-week recall (red) and recall 'since-birth' (blue) dietary assessments at twelve weeks.
Figure 5
Figure 5
a-b: Use of items qualifying for predominant breastfeeding (PBF) and mixed feeding (MF) for individuals by weekly assessment. The illustrations represent water-based items, ORS and fruit juices among breastfed infants (qualifying for PBF) (grid pattern, left, 5a) and milk-based and semi-solid items among breastfed infants (qualifying for MF) (line pattern, right, 5b) given to 30 Ugandan infants from the age of 0 to 12 weeks. The information is based on weekly short-time recall (24-hour recall and 1-week recall). Each row represent one infant and each column represent one week in Figure a and b, respectively. The individuals in the two figures are linked with given numbers from 1-30. Gray pattern represents missed visits.

References

    1. Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J. Where and why are 10 million children dying every year? Lancet. 2003;361:2226–2234. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13779-8.
    1. Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E, Haider BA, Kirkwood B, Morris SS, Sachdev HP, Shekar M. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet. 2008;371:417–440. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61693-6.
    1. Millenium development goals.
    1. Bryce J, Terreri N, Victora CG, Mason E, Daelmans B, Bhutta ZA, Bustreo F, Songane F, Salama P, Wardlaw T. Countdown to 2015: tracking intervention coverage for child survival. Lancet. 2006;368:1067–1076. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69339-2.
    1. Perre P Van de. Postnatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: the breast-feeding dilemma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:483–487. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90270-8.
    1. Coovadia HM, Bland RM. Preserving breastfeeding practice through the HIV pandemic. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:1116–1133.
    1. Coovadia HM, Rollins NC, Bland RM, Little K, Coutsoudis A, Bennish ML, Newell ML. Mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 infection during exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months of life: an intervention cohort study. Lancet. 2007;369:1107–1116. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60283-9.
    1. International Aids Society conference 2009: Abstract no. #WELBB101 (Mma Bana-study), #LBPEC01 (Kesho Bora-study) and #WELBC103 (BAN-study)
    1. HIV and Infant Feeding Technical Consultation Held on behalf of the Inter-agency Task Team (IATT) on Prevention of HIV Infections in Pregnant Women, Mothers and their Infants. Geneva: WHO; 2006.
    1. Leshabari SC, Blystad A, Moland KM. Difficult choices: infant feeding experiences of HIV-positive mothers in northern Tanzania. SAHARA J. 2007;4:544–555.
    1. de Paoli M, Manongi R, Helsing E, Klepp KI. Exclusive breastfeeding in the era of AIDS. J Hum Lact. 2001;17:313–320. doi: 10.1177/089033440101700405.
    1. Doherty T, Chopra M, Nkonki L, Jackson D, Greiner T. Effect of the HIV epidemic on infant feeding in South Africa: "When they see me coming with the tins they laugh at me". Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84:90–96. doi: 10.2471/BLT.04.019448.
    1. Revisions to WHO guidelines for antiretroviral treatment of pregnant women and prevention of HIV infection in infants.
    1. Towards universal access: Scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector. Geneva: WHO, Unicef, UNAIDS; 2008.
    1. HIV and Infant Feeding Guidelines for Decision Makers. WHO, UNICEF, UNAIDS, UNFPA; 2003.
    1. Engebretsen IM, Wamani H, Karamagi C, Semiyaga N, Tumwine J, Tylleskar T. Low adherence to exclusive breastfeeding in Eastern Uganda: a community-based cross-sectional study comparing dietary recall since birth with 24-hour recall. BMC Pediatr. 2007;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-7-10.
    1. Britton C, McCormick FM, Renfrew MJ, Wade A, King SE. Support for breastfeeding mothers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. p. CD001141.
    1. Bhandari N, Kabir AK, Salam MA. Mainstreaming nutrition into maternal and child health programmes: scaling up of exclusive breastfeeding. Matern Child Nutr. 2008;4(Suppl 1):5–23.
    1. Kramer MS, Kakuma R. The Optimal Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding: a Systematic Review. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
    1. Breastfeeding and Replacement Feeding Practices in the Context of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV. An Assessment Tool for Research. WHO/RHR/01.12 WHO/CAH/01.21. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
    1. Indicators for Assessing Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices Part 1 Definitions. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
    1. Bland RM, Rollins NC, Solarsh G, Broeck J Van den, Coovadia HM. Maternal recall of exclusive breast feeding duration. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88:778–783. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.9.778.
    1. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2006. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Uganda Bureau of Statistics Entebbe (UBOS) and ORC Macro; 2006.
    1. Tylleskar T. Preliminary results from the multi-centre cluster-randmised behaviour interventions trial PROMISE EBF: Exclusive breastfeeding promotion in Sub-Saharan Africa. 19th International Congress of Nutrition; 4-9 September; Bangkok, Thailand. 2009.
    1. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–363.
    1. Kappa Coefficients.
    1. EpiData home page.
    1. Vähätalo L, Bärlund S, Hannila ML, Uusitalo U, Pigg HM, Salonen M, Nucci A, Krischer JP, Knip M, Akerblom HK, Virtanen SM. Relative validity of a dietary interview for assessing infant diet and compliance in a dietary intervention trial. Matern Child Nutr. 2006;2:181–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2006.00063.x.
    1. Almroth S, Latham MC. Breast feeding practices in rural Jamaica. J Trop Pediatr. 1982;28:103–109.
    1. Edmond KM, Zandoh C, Quigley MA, Amenga-Etego S, Owusu-Agyei S, Kirkwood BR. Delayed breastfeeding initiation increases risk of neonatal mortality. Pediatrics. 2006;117:e380–386. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1496.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться