Genetic polymorphisms associated with increased risk of developing chronic myelogenous leukemia

Heriberto Bruzzoni-Giovanelli, Juan R González, François Sigaux, Bruno O Villoutreix, Jean Michel Cayuela, Joëlle Guilhot, Claude Preudhomme, François Guilhot, Jean-Luc Poyet, Philippe Rousselot, Heriberto Bruzzoni-Giovanelli, Juan R González, François Sigaux, Bruno O Villoutreix, Jean Michel Cayuela, Joëlle Guilhot, Claude Preudhomme, François Guilhot, Jean-Luc Poyet, Philippe Rousselot

Abstract

Little is known about inherited factors associated with the risk of developing chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). We used a dedicated DNA chip containing 16 561 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) covering 1 916 candidate genes to analyze 437 CML patients and 1 144 healthy control individuals. Single SNP association analysis identified 139 SNPs that passed multiple comparisons (1% false discovery rate). The HDAC9, AVEN, SEMA3C, IKBKB, GSTA3, RIPK1 and FGF2 genes were each represented by three SNPs, the PSM family by four SNPs and the SLC15A1 gene by six. Haplotype analysis showed that certain combinations of rare alleles of these genes increased the risk of developing CML by more than two or three-fold. A classification tree model identified five SNPs belonging to the genes PSMB10, TNFRSF10D, PSMB2, PPARD and CYP26B1, which were associated with CML predisposition. A CML-risk-allele score was created using these five SNPs. This score was accurate for discriminating CML status (AUC: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.58-0.64). Interestingly, the score was associated with age at diagnosis and the average number of risk alleles was significantly higher in younger patients. The risk-allele score showed the same distribution in the general population (HapMap CEU samples) as in our control individuals and was associated with differential gene expression patterns of two genes (VAPA and TDRKH). In conclusion, we describe haplotypes and a genetic score that are significantly associated with a predisposition to develop CML. The SNPs identified will also serve to drive fundamental research on the putative role of these genes in CML development.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00219739.

Keywords: CML; SNPs; genetic predisposition; myeloid leukemia.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All the authors read and approved the final manuscript and declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1. Manhattan Plot presenting p-values (−log10…
Figure 1. Manhattan Plot presenting p-values (−log10 scale) for the association between CML patients and controls for the 13 937 SNPs passing quality control criteria
The horizontal line indicates the 1% FDR significance threshold.
Figure 2. SNP selection procedure and prediction…
Figure 2. SNP selection procedure and prediction of the probability of developing CML
A)A classification tree was developed to discriminate CML versus control individuals, using the SNPs obtained from a stepwise multivariate logistic model from the 139 selected SNPs in the single analysis. As an example, individuals carrying two copies of a minor allele B of SNP rs376864 are more likely to develop CML than individuals carrying the normal allele and hence were classified as CML patients. For individuals carrying at least one normal allele, the SNP rs14178 was also taken into account; individuals having normal alleles for rs14178 and rs6668196 were classified as controls, however, individuals having a normal allele for rs14178 and two rare alleles for rs6668196 were classified as CML. B) Variable importance plot used to create the classification tree. The barplot shows a large decay of importance from the sixth SNP, so only the first five SNPs were used to classify individuals (i.e. in the classification tree in A). C) Distribution of the genetic score (sum of risk alleles) created using the five selected SNPs obtained from the classification tree methodology. D) ROC curve and its AUC value.
Figure 3. Average number of risk alleles…
Figure 3. Average number of risk alleles as a function of age at diagnosis
Genetic risk alleles are more frequent in younger patients, with risk starting to increase again for older patients (>75 years). The X-axis depicts the number of risk alleles grouped in different categories (0, 1, 2, 3, +4 alleles). The right Y-axis represents the number of individuals (bars) while the left Y-axis shows the mean age (dots) for each risk score category.

References

    1. Malak S, Labopin M, Saint-Martin C, Bellanne-Chantelot C, Najman A, French Group of Familial Myeloproliferative D Long term follow up of 93 families with myeloproliferative neoplasms: life expectancy and implications of JAK2V617F in the occurrence of complications. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2012;49:170–176.
    1. Boultwood J, Perry J, Zaman R, Fernandez-Santamaria C, Littlewood T, Kusec R, Pellagatti A, Wang L, Clark RE, Wainscoat JS. High-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrayanalysis and ASXL1 gene mutation screening in chronic myeloid leukemia during disease progression. Leukemia. 2010;24:1139–1145.
    1. Zhang SJ, Shi JY, Li JY. GATA-2L359 V mutation is exclusively associated with CML progression but not other hematological malignancies and GATA-2 P250A is a novel single nucleotide polymorphism. Leuk Res. 2009;33:1141–1143.
    1. Angelini S, Soverini S, Ravegnini G, Barnett M, Turrini E, Thornquist M, Pane F, Hughes TP, White DL, Radich J, Kim DW, Saglio G, Cilloni D, et al. Association between imatinib transporters and metabolizing enzymes genotype and response in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving imatinib therapy. Haematologica. 2013;98:193–200.
    1. Crossman LC, O'Hare T, Lange T, Willis SG, Stoffregen EP, Corbin AS, O'Brien SG, Heinrich MC, Druker BJ, Middleton PG, Deininger MW. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the coding region of ABL and its effects on sensitivity to imatinib. Leukemia. 2005;19:1859–1862.
    1. Delord M, Rousselot P, Cayuela JM, Sigaux F, Guilhot J, Preudhomme C, Guilhot F, Loiseau P, Raffoux E, Geromin D, Genin E, Calvo F, Bruzzoni-Giovanelli H. High imatinib dose overcomes insufficient response associated with ABCG2 haplotype in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients. Oncotarget. 2013;4:1582–1591.
    1. Dulucq S, Bouchet S, Turcq B, Lippert E, Etienne G, Reiffers J, Molimard M, Krajinovic M, Mahon FX. Multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) polymorphisms are associated with majormolecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2008;112:2024–2027.
    1. Guillem VM, Cervantes F, Martinez J, Alvarez-Larran A, Collado M, Camos M, Sureda A, Maffioli M, Marugan I, Hernandez-Boluda JC. XPC genetic polymorphisms correlate with the response to imatinib treatment in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:482–486.
    1. Kim DH, Sriharsha L, Xu W, Kamel-Reid S, Liu X, Siminovitch K, Messner HA, Lipton JH. Clinical relevance of a pharmacogenetic approach using multiple candidate genes to predict response and resistance to imatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4750–4758.
    1. Kim DH, Kong JH, Byeun JY, Jung CW, Xu W, Liu X, Kamel-Reid S, Kim YK, Kim HJ, Lipton JH. The IFNG (IFN-gamma) genotype predicts cytogenetic and molecular response to imatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5339–5350.
    1. Kim DH, Xu W, Kamel-Reid S, Liu X, Jung CW, Kim S, Lipton JH. Clinical relevance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFA) and VEGF receptor (VEGFR2) gene polymorphism on the treatment outcome following imatinib therapy. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1179–1188.
    1. Kim DH, Xu W, Ma C, Liu X, Siminovitch K, Messner HA, Lipton JH. Genetic variants in the candidate genes of the apoptosis pathway and susceptibility to chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2009;113:2517–2525.
    1. Liu YC, Hsiao HH, Yang WC, Liu TC, Chang CS, Yang MY, Lin PM, Hsu JF, Lee CP, Lin SF. MDM2 promoter polymorphism and p53 codon 72 polymorphism in chronic myeloid leukemia: The association between MDM2 promoter genotype and disease susceptibility, age of onset, and blast-free survival in chronic phase patients receiving imatinib. Mol Carcinog. 2014;53:951–959.
    1. Ma X, Ruan G, Wang Y, Li Q, Zhu P, Qin YZ, Li JL, Liu YR, Ma D, Zhao H. Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms with linkage disequilibrium in the human programmed cell death 5 gene 5′ regulatory region affect promoter activity and the susceptibility of chronic myelogenous leukemia in Chinese population. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:8592–8599.
    1. Taspinar M, Aydos SE, Comez O, Elhan AH, Karabulut HG, Sunguroglu A. CYP1A1, GST gene polymorphisms and risk of chronic myeloid leukemia. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008;138:12–17.
    1. Ozten N, Sunguroglu A, Bosland MC. Variations in glutathione-S-transferase genes influence riskof chronic myeloid leukemia. Hematol Oncol. 2012;30:150–155.
    1. Chen HC, Hu WX, Liu QX, Li WK, Chen FZ, Rao ZZ, Liu XF, Luo YP, Cao YF. Genetic polymorphisms of metabolic enzymes CYP1A1, CYP2D6, GSTM1 and GSTT1 and leukemia susceptibility. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008;17:251–258.
    1. Zhang Y, Wang B, Ye S, Liu S, Liu M, Shen C, Teng Y, Qi J. Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor gene polymorphisms in patients with leukemia: possible association with susceptibility to the disease. Leuk Res. 2010;34:55–58.
    1. Dong S, Liu Y, Chen J. MTHFR gene polymorphism and risk of myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:8913–8919.
    1. Kim DH, Lee ST, Won HH, Kim S, Kim MJ, Kim HJ, Kim SH, Kim JW, Kim HJ, Kim YK, Sohn SK, Moon JH, Jung CW, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies novel loci associated with susceptibility to chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011;117:6906–6911.
    1. Preudhomme C, Guilhot J, Nicolini FE, Guerci-Bresler A, Rigal-Huguet F, Maloisel F, Coiteux V, Gardembas M, Berthou C, Vekhoff A, Rea D, Jourdan E, Allard C, et al. Imatinib plus peginterferon alfa-2a in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl JMed. 2010;363:2511–2521.
    1. Ahmed I, Tamouza R, Delord M, Krishnamoorthy R, Tzourio C, Mulot C, Nacfer M, Lambert JC, Beaune P, Laurent-Puig P, Loriot MA, Charron D, Elbaz A. Association between Parkinson's disease and the HLA-DRB1 locus. Mov Disord. 2012;27:1104–1110.
    1. Wigginton JE, Cutler DJ, Abecasis GR. A note on exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:887–893.
    1. Yang Q, Wang Y. Methods for Analyzing Multivariate Phenotypes in Genetic Association Studies. J Probab Stat. 2012;2012:652569.
    1. Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med. 1990;9:811–818.
    1. Sinnwell J, PaS D.J. haplo.stats: Statistical Analysis of Haplotypes with Traits and Covariates when Linkage Phase is Ambiguous. R package version 1.6.11
    1. Zhang K, Chang S, Cui S, Guo L, Zhang L, Wang J. ICSNPathway: identify candidate causal SNPs and pathways from genome-wide association study by one analytical framework. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W437–443.
    1. Nagelkerke N. A Note on a General Definition of the Coefficient of Determination. Biometrika. 1991;78:691–692.
    1. Gonzalez JR, Armengol L, Sole X, Guino E, Mercader JM, Estivill X, Moreno V. SNPassoc: an R package to perform whole genome association studies. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:644–645.
    1. International HapMap Project Available at:
    1. EMBL 1000 Genomes Project.
    1. R Development Core Team . R: Alanguage and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2008. URL: ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
    1. Tapper W, Jones AV, Kralovics R, Harutyunyan AS, Zoi K, Leung W, Godfrey AL, Guglielmelli P, Callaway A, Ward D, Aranaz P, White HE, Waghorn K, et al. Genetic variation at MECOM, TERT, JAK2 and HBS1L-MYB predisposes to myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6691.
    1. Ghiaur G, Yegnasubramanian S, Perkins B, Gucwa JL, Gerber JM, Jones RJ. Regulation of human hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal by the microenvironment's control of retinoic acid signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:16121–16126.
    1. Clancy L, Mruk K, Archer K, Woelfel M, Mongkolsapaya J, Screaton G, Lenardo MJ, Chan FK. Preligand assembly domain-mediated ligand-independent association between TRAIL receptor 4 (TR4) and TR2 regulates TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:18099–18104.
    1. Yang Y, Burke RV, Jeon CY, Chang SC, Chang PY, Morgenstern H, Tashkin DP, Mao J, Cozen W, Mack TM, Rao J, Zhang ZF. Polymorphisms of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and survival of lung cancer and upper aero-digestive tract cancers. Lung Cancer. 2014;85:449–456.
    1. Wada T, Yamashita Y, Saga Y, Takahashi K, Koinuma K, Choi YL, Kaneda R, Fujiwara S, Soda M, Watanabe H, Kurashina K, Hatanaka H, Enomoto M, et al. Screening for genetic abnormalities involved in ovarian carcinogenesis using retroviral expression libraries. Int J Oncol. 2009;35:973–976.
    1. Ozbas-Gerceker F, Bozman N, Kok S, Pehlivan M, Yilmaz M, Pehlivan S, Oguzkan-Balci S. Association of an LMP2 polymorphism with acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:6399–6402.
    1. Yang XW, Wang P, Liu JQ, Zhang H, Xi WD, Jia XH, Wang KK. Coordinated regulation of the immunoproteasome subunits by PML/RARalpha and PU. 1 in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Oncogene. 2014;33:2700–2708.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться