Colorectal and interval cancers of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in the Basque Country (Spain)

Isabel Portillo, Eunate Arana-Arri, Isabel Idigoras, Isabel Bilbao, Lorea Martínez-Indart, Luis Bujanda, Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Isabel Portillo, Eunate Arana-Arri, Isabel Idigoras, Isabel Bilbao, Lorea Martínez-Indart, Luis Bujanda, Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea

Abstract

Aim: To assess proportions, related conditions and survival of interval cancer (IC).

Methods: The programme has a linkage with different clinical databases and cancer registers to allow suitable evaluation. This evaluation involves the detection of ICs after a negative faecal inmunochemical test (FIT), interval cancer FIT (IC-FIT) prior to a subsequent invitation, and the detection of ICs after a positive FIT and confirmatory diagnosis without colorectal cancer (CRC) detected and before the following recommended colonoscopy, IC-colonoscopy. We conducted a retrospective observational study analyzing from January 2009 to December 2015 1193602 invited people onto the Programme (participation rate of 68.6%).

Results: Two thousand five hundred and eighteen cancers were diagnosed through the programme, 18 cases of IC-colonoscopy were found before the recommended follow-up (43542 colonoscopies performed) and 186 IC-FIT were identified before the following invitation of the 769200 negative FITs. There was no statistically significant relation between the predictor variables of ICs with sex, age and deprivation index, but there was relation between location and stage. Additionally, it was observed that there was less risk when the location was distal rather than proximal (OR = 0.28, 95%CI: 0.20-0.40, P < 0.0001), with no statistical significance when the location was in the rectum as opposed to proximal. When comparing the screen-detected cancers (SCs) with ICs, significant differences in survival were found (P < 0.001); being the 5-years survival for SCs 91.6% and IC-FIT 77.8%.

Conclusion: These findings in a Population Based CRC Screening Programme indicate the need of population-based studies that continue analyzing related factors to improve their detection and reducing harm.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Diagnosis; Faecal immunochemical test; Interval cancer; Mortality; Population Screening Programme; Survival.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: No conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of colorectal cancer stages by location and type.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meyer survival curve by different colorectal cancer types.

References

    1. Lopez de Munain A. Incidencia del cáncer en la comunidad autónoma de Euskadi, 2013. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Departamento de Salud, Servicio de Registros e Información Sanitaria. Available from: .
    1. Department of Health and Consumer Affairs. Cancer in the Basque Country. Incidence, mortality, survival and their trends. 1st edn. Gasteiz: Eusko Jaurlaritzaren Argitalpen Zerbitzu Nagusia, 2010. Available from: .
    1. von Karsa L, Anttila A, Ronco G, Ponti A, Malila N, Arbyn M, Segnan N, Castillo-Beltran M, Boniol M, Ferlay J, et al. Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on cancer screening. Available from: .
    1. Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs. The National Health System Cancer Strategy. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo: Madrid, 2006. Available from: .
    1. Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality. The National Health System Cancer Strategy. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, 2009. Available from: .
    1. Portillo I, Idígoras I, Ojembarrena E, Arana-Arri E, Zubero MB, Pijoán JI, López Urrutia A, Marqués ML. [Main results of the colorectal cancer screening program in the Basque Country (Spain)] Gac Sanit. 2013;27:358–361.
    1. Portillo I, Idígoras I, Ojembarrena E, Arana E, Luis Hurtado J, Basurko R, Tapia M, Luz Peña M. [Lesions detected in a colorectal cancer screening program in the Basque Country: first round (2009-2011)] Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;36:301–308.
    1. Hurtado JL, Bacigalupe A, Calvo M, Esnaola S, Mendizabal N, Portillo I, Idigoras I, Millán E, Arana-Arri E. Social inequalities in a population based colorectal cancer screening programme in the Basque Country. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1021.
    1. Bujanda L, Sarasqueta C, Castells A, Pellisé M, Cubiella J, Gil I, Cosme A, Arana-Arri E, Mar I, Idigoras I, et al. Colorectal cancer in a second round after a negative faecal immunochemical test. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27:813–818.
    1. Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Brussels: European Commission; 2011: 386. Available from: .
    1. Robinson MHE, Hardcastle JD, Moss SM, Amar SS, Chamberlain JO, Armitage NCM, Scholefield JH, Mangham CM. The risk of screening: data from the Nottingham randomized controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Gut. 1999;45:588–592.
    1. Anttila A, Lönnberg S, Ponti A, Suonio E, Villain P, Coebergh JW, von Karsa L. Towards better implementation of cancer screening in Europe through improved monitoring and evaluation and greater engagement of cancer registries. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:241–251.
    1. GISCoR Working Group, Zorzi M (Coordinator) Detection of the interval cancers and estimate of the sensitivity of colorectal cancer screening programmes. Working report. Epidemiol Prev 2013; 37 (2-3) suppl 1. Available from: .
    1. Zubero MB, Arana-Arri E, Pijoan JI, Portillo I, Idigoras I, López-Urrutia A, Samper A, Uranga B, Rodríguez C, Bujanda L. Population-based colorectal cancer screening: comparison of two fecal occult blood test. Front Pharmacol. 2014;4:175.
    1. Jover R and Grupo de trabajo de la AEG-SEED. Programa de calidad en la colonoscopia de cribado. Ed. EdimSa. Madrid 164p. Available from: .
    1. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE, Compton CC, Hess KR, Sullivan DC, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Chicago: Springer 7th ed. 2010: 615-649
    1. Domínguez-Berjón MF, Borrell C, Cano-Serral G, Esnaola S, Nolasco A, Pasarín MI, Ramis R, Saurina C, Escolar-Pujolar A. [Constructing a deprivation index based on census data in large Spanish cities(the MEDEA project)] Gac Sanit. 2008;22:179–187.
    1. Stegeman I, de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, van Leerdam M, van Ballegooijen M, Kraaijenhagen RA, Fockens P, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E, Bossuyt PM. Risk factors for false positive and for false negative test results in screening with fecal occult blood testing. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:2408–2414.
    1. Sanduleanu S, le Clercq CM, Dekker E, Meijer GA, Rabeneck L, Rutter MD, Valori R, Young GP, Schoen RE. Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. Gut. 2015;64:1257–1267.
    1. Zorzi M, Fedato C, Grazzini G, Stocco FC, Banovich F, Bortoli A, Cazzola L, Montaguti A, Moretto T, Zappa M, et al. High sensitivity of five colorectal screening programmes with faecal immunochemical test in the Veneto Region, Italy. Gut. 2011;60:944–949.
    1. Gill MD, Bramble MG, Rees CJ, Lee TJ, Bradburn DM, Mills SJ. Comparison of screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers in the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:417–421.
    1. Steele RJ, Stanners G, Lang J, Brewster DH, Carey FA, Fraser CG. Interval cancers in a national colorectal cancer screening programme. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4:587–594.
    1. Moss SM, Campbell C, Melia J, Coleman D, Smith S, Parker R, Ramsell P, Patnick J, Weller DP. Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot. Gut. 2012;61:101–107.
    1. Steele RJ, McClements PL, Libby G, Carey FA, Fraser CG. Patterns of uptake in a biennial faecal occult blood test screening programme for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:28–32.
    1. Garcia M, Domènech X, Vidal C, Torné E, Milà N, Binefa G, Benito L, Moreno V. Interval cancers in a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer in catalonia, Spain. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:672410.
    1. Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA, Schatzkin A, Cross AJ, Zauber AG, Church TR, Lance P, et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut. 2014;63:949–956.
    1. le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ, Bakker CM, Keulen ET, de Ridder RJ, Winkens B, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut. 2014;63:957–963.
    1. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Hoffmeister M. Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut. 2012;61:1576–1582.
    1. Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TM, Pappas L, Boucher K, Provenzale D, Rowe KG, Mineau GP, Smith K, Pimentel R, et al. Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:950–960.
    1. Richter JM, Campbell EJ, Chung DC. Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:46–51.
    1. Digby J, Fraser CG, Carey FA, Lang J, Stanners G, Steele RJ. Interval cancers using a quantitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for haemoglobin when colonoscopy capacity is limited. J Med Screen. 2016;23:130–134.
    1. Gill MD, Bramble MG, Hull MA, Mills SJ, Morris E, Bradburn DM, Bury Y, Parker CE, Lee TJ, Rees CJ. Screen-detected colorectal cancers are associated with an improved outcome compared with stage-matched interval cancers. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:2076–2081.
    1. Morris EJ, Whitehouse LE, Farrell T, Nickerson C, Thomas JD, Quirke P, Rutter MD, Rees C, Finan PJ, Wilkinson JR, et al. A retrospective observational study examining the characteristics and outcomes of tumours diagnosed within and without of the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:757–764.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться