Effect of adherence to self-monitoring of diet and physical activity on weight loss in a technology-supported behavioral intervention

Jing Wang, Susan M Sereika, Eileen R Chasens, Linda J Ewing, Judith T Matthews, Lora E Burke, Jing Wang, Susan M Sereika, Eileen R Chasens, Linda J Ewing, Judith T Matthews, Lora E Burke

Abstract

Background: Examination of mediating behavioral factors could explain how an intervention works and thus provide guidance to optimize behavioral weight-loss programs. This study examined the mediating role of adherence to self-monitoring of diet and physical activity on weight loss in a behavioral weight-loss trial testing the use of personal digital assistants (PDA) for self-monitoring.

Methods: Mediation analysis was conducted to examine the possible mediating role of adherence to self-monitoring of diet and physical activity between treatments using varying self-monitoring methods (paper record, PDA, and PDA with daily tailored feedback messages) and weight loss.

Findings: The sample (N = 210) was predominantly white (78%) and female (85%). Compared to a paper record, using a PDA for self-monitoring diet (P = 0.027) and physical activity (P = 0.014) had significant direct effects on weight loss at 12 months, as well as a significant indirect effect on outcomes through improved adherence to self-monitoring (P(S) < 0.001). Receiving an automated daily feedback message via PDA only had a significant indirect effect on weight through self-monitoring adherence to diet (P = 0.004) and physical activity (P = 0.002).

Conclusions: Adherence to self-monitoring of diet and physical activity is important as the underlying mechanism in this technology-supported behavioral weight-loss intervention.

Keywords: adherence; behavioral intervention; mediation analysis; mobile technology; self-monitoring; weight loss.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram. Abbreviations: PR, paper record; PDA, personal digital assistant; FB, feedback.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mediation model. Abbreviations: PR, paper record; PDA, personal digital assistant; DFB, daily feedback.

References

    1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235–241.
    1. Wing RR. Behavioral approaches to the treatment of obesity. In: Bray GA, Bourchard C, James WPT, editors. Handbook of Obesity: Clinical Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004. pp. 147–167.
    1. Wadden TA, Crerand CE, Brock J. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005;28(1):151–170.
    1. Baker RC, Kirschenbaum DS. Self-monitoring may be necessary for successful weight control. Behav Ther. 1993;24:377–394.
    1. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;6(3):219–224.
    1. Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(19):92–102.
    1. Helsel DL, Jakicic JM, Otto AD. Comparison of techniques for self-monitoring eating and exercise behaviors on weight loss in a correspondence- based intervention. Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(10):1807–1810.
    1. Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285(9):1172–1177.
    1. Webber KH, Tate DF, Ward DS, Bowling JM. Motivation and its relationship to adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss in a 16-week Internet behavioral weight loss intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42(3):161–167.
    1. Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(15):1620–1625.
    1. Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1833–1836.
    1. Butryn ML, Phelan S, Hill JO, Wing RR. Consistent self-monitoring of weight: a key component of successful weight loss maintenance. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15(12):3091–3096.
    1. Nothwehr F, Peterson NA. Healthy eating and exercise: strategies for weight management in the rural midwest. Health Educ Behav. 2005;32(2):253–263.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182.
    1. Acharya SD, Elci OU, Sereika SM, et al. Adherence to a behavioral weight loss treatment program enhances weight loss and improvements in biomarkers. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009;3:151–160.
    1. Burke LE, Conroy MB, Sereika SM, et al. The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: a randomized behavioral weight loss trial. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19(2):338–344.
    1. Burke LE, Choo J, Music E, et al. PREFER study: a randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management – rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials. 2006;27(1):34–48.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182.
    1. Blanson Henkemans OA, van der Boog PJ, Lindenberg J, et al. An online lifestyle diary with a persuasive computer assistant providing feedback on self-management. Technol Health Care. 2009;17(3):253–267.
    1. Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(1):92–102.
    1. Carels RA, Darby LA, Rydin S, Douglass OM, Cacciapaglia HM, O’Brien WH. The relationship between self-monitoring, outcome expectancies, difficulties with eating and exercise, and physical activity and weight loss treatment outcomes. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(3):182–190.
    1. Conroy MB, Yang K, Elci EU, et al. Physical activity self-monitoring and weight loss: 6-month results of the SMART trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1568–1574.
    1. Yon BA, Johnson RK, Harvey-Berino J, Gold BC, Howard AB. Personal digital assistants are comparable to traditional diaries for dietary self-monitoring during a weight loss program. J Behav Med. 2007;30(2):165–175.
    1. White MA, Martin PD, Newton RL, et al. Mediators of weight loss in a family-based intervention presented over the internet. Obes Res. 2004;12(7):1050–1059.
    1. Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Collins CE, Warren JM, Callister R. Exploring the mechanisms of weight loss in the SHED-IT intervention for overweight men: a mediation analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:76.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться