Comparison of upper airway patency in patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea during dexmedetomidine or propofol sedation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Hyun-Jung Shin, Eun-Young Kim, Jung-Won Hwang, Sang-Hwan Do, Hyo-Seok Na, Hyun-Jung Shin, Eun-Young Kim, Jung-Won Hwang, Sang-Hwan Do, Hyo-Seok Na

Abstract

Background: In addition to propofol, dexmedetomidine is a suitable alternative for intraoperative sedation in procedures requiring regional anesthesia. To date, however, little is known about the influences of each drug on upper airway patency. Accordingly, the authors investigated differences between dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation in the occurrence of upper airway obstruction and requirements for airway intervention in patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea.

Methods: Patients with an apnea/hypopnea index of 5-14/h according to Watch-PAT 200 analysis were enrolled in this study. Spinal anesthesia was routinely performed for surgery. Intraoperative sedation was initiated using either dexmedetomidine or propofol infusion at a level of modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale 3. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients exhibiting signs of upper airway obstruction. A sign of upper airway obstruction was defined as no detection of end-tidal carbon dioxide for at least 10 s despite respiratory efforts.

Results: A total of 50 patients were included in the final analysis (dexmedetomidine [n = 26]; propofol [n = 24]). During the intraoperative sedation period, there was a significantly lower proportion of patients exhibiting signs of upper airway obstruction in the dexmedetomidine group than in the propofol group (11.5% vs. 41.7%, P = 0.035). An artificial airway was inserted in 1 patients (3.8%) and 5 patient (20.8%) in the dexmedetomidine and propofol groups, respectively (P = 0.093).

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine sedation was associated with a lower incidence of upper airway obstruction than propofol sedation in patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea.

Trial registration number: Clinical trials.gov ( NCT02993718 ): Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; Obstructive sleep apnea; Propofol; Sedation.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki after the approval of Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (B-1411/275–003). Written informed consent was obtained from the enrolled patients before surgery.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of patients’ enrollment. AHI, apnea/hypopnea index; BMI, body mass index
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The change of modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale. A stable mid-modified OAA/S scales were presented at 30 min intervals. PACU, post-anesthetic care unit
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changed of mean arterial pressure and heart rate during sedation and postoperative period, PACU, post-anesthetic care unit

References

    1. Becker DE, Haas DA. Management of complications during moderate and deep sedation: respiratory and cardiovascular considerations. Anesth Prog. 2007;54(2):59–68. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2007)54[59:MOCDMA];2.
    1. Becker DE, Haas DA. Recognition and management of complications during moderate and deep sedation part 1: respiratory considerations. Anesth Prog. 2011;58(2):82–92. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-58.2.82.
    1. Liao P, Yegneswaran B, Vairavanathan S, Zilberman P, Chung F. Postoperative complications in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a retrospective matched cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56(11):819–828. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9190-y.
    1. Mador MJ, Goplani S, Gottumukkala VA, El-Solh AA, Akashdeep K, Khadka G, Abo-Khamis M. Postoperative complications in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2013;17(2):727–734. doi: 10.1007/s11325-012-0750-y.
    1. Hall JE, Uhrich TD, Barney JA, Arain SR, Ebert TJ. Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(3):699–705. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00035.
    1. Na HS, Song IA, Park HS, Hwang JW, Do SH, Kim CS. Dexmedetomidine is effective for monitored anesthesia care in outpatients undergoing cataract surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011;61(6):453–459. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.6.453.
    1. Ryu JH, Lee SW, Lee JH, Lee EH, Do SH, Kim CS. Randomized double-blind study of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for flexible bronchoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(3):503–511. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer400.
    1. Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Sagara S, Kanai T, Yahagi N. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2015;27(1):8–15. doi: 10.1111/den.12399.
    1. Huupponen E, Maksimow A, Lapinlampi P, Sarkela M, Saastamoinen A, Snapir A, Scheinin H, Scheinin M, Merilainen P, Himanen SL, et al. Electroencephalogram spindle activity during dexmedetomidine sedation and physiological sleep. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(2):289–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01537.x.
    1. Hsu YW, Cortinez LI, Robertson KM, Keifer JC, Sum-Ping ST, Moretti EW, Young CC, Wright DR, Macleod DB, Somma J. Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: part I: crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(5):1066–1076. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00005.
    1. Lee MH, Yang KH, Lee CS, Lee HS, Moon SY, Hwang SI, Song JH. The effect-site concentration of propofol producing respiratory depression during spinal anesthesia. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2011;61(2):122–126. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.2.122.
    1. Peacock JE, Luntley JB, O'Connor B, Reilly CS, Ogg TW, Watson BJ, Shaikh S. Remifentanil in combination with propofol for spontaneous ventilation anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80(4):509–511. doi: 10.1093/bja/80.4.509.
    1. Mahmoud M, Ishman SL, McConnell K, Fleck R, Shott S, Mylavarapu G, Gutmark E, Zou Y, Szczesniak R, Amin RS. Upper airway reflexes are preserved during Dexmedetomidine sedation in children with Down syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(5):721–727. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6592.
    1. Pang KP, Gourin CG, Terris DJ. A comparison of polysomnography and the WatchPAT in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(4):665–668. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.03.015.
    1. Hohener D, Blumenthal S, Borgeat A. Sedation and regional anaesthesia in the adult patient. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(1):8–16. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem342.
    1. Mingir T, Ervatan Z, Turgut N. Spinal Anaesthesia and perioperative anxiety. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014;42(4):190–195. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.99705.
    1. Vasu TS, Grewal R, Doghramji K. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and perioperative complications: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(2):199–207.
    1. Kaw R, Pasupuleti V, Walker E, Ramaswamy A, Foldvary-Schafer N. Postoperative complications in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 2012;141(2):436–441. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0283.
    1. Peng K, Li J, Ji FH, Li Z. Dexmedetomidine compared with propofol for pediatric sedation during cerebral angiography. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(6):549–554.
    1. Mahmoud M, Gunter J, Donnelly LF, Wang Y, Nick TG, Sadhasivam S. A comparison of dexmedetomidine with propofol for magnetic resonance imaging sleep studies in children. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(3):745–753. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181adc506.
    1. Mahmoud M, Radhakrishman R, Gunter J, Sadhasivam S, Schapiro A, McAuliffe J, Kurth D, Wang Y, Nick TG, Donnelly LF. Effect of increasing depth of dexmedetomidine anesthesia on upper airway morphology in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(6):506–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03311.x.
    1. Watt S, Sabouri S, Hegazy R, Gupta P, Heard C. Does dexmedetomidine cause less airway collapse than propofol when used for deep sedation? J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.035.
    1. Mathru M, Esch O, Lang J, Herbert ME, Chaljub G, Goodacre B, vanSonnenberg E. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway. Effects of propofol anesthesia and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in humans. Anesthesiology. 1996;84(2):273–279. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199602000-00004.
    1. Sundman E, Witt H, Sandin R, Kuylenstierna R, Boden K, Ekberg O, Eriksson LI. Pharyngeal function and airway protection during subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: volunteers examined by pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(5):1125–1132. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00016.
    1. Mahmoud M, Jung D, Salisbury S, McAuliffe J, Gunter J, Patio M, Donnelly LF, Fleck R. Effect of increasing depth of dexmedetomidine and propofol anesthesia on upper airway morphology in children and adolescents with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Anesth. 2013;25(7):529–541. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.04.011.
    1. Eastwood PR, Szollosi I, Platt PR, Hillman DR. Comparison of upper airway collapse during general anaesthesia and sleep. Lancet (London, England) 2002;359(9313):1207–1209. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08224-7.
    1. Arain SR, Ebert TJ. The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(2):461–466.
    1. Shah PJ, Dubey KP, Sahare KK, Agrawal A. Intravenous dexmedetomidine versus propofol for intraoperative moderate sedation during spinal anesthesia: a comparative study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016;32(2):245–249. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.168172.
    1. Bloor BC, Ward DS, Belleville JP, Maze M. Effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine in humans. II Hemodynamic changes. Anesthesiology. 1992;77(6):1134–1142. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199212000-00014.
    1. Goodchild CS, Serrao JM. Propofol-induced cardiovascular depression: science and art. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(4):641–642. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev320.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться