The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change

David A Chambers, Russell E Glasgow, Kurt C Stange, David A Chambers, Russell E Glasgow, Kurt C Stange

Abstract

Background: Despite growth in implementation research, limited scientific attention has focused on understanding and improving sustainability of health interventions. Models of sustainability have been evolving to reflect challenges in the fit between intervention and context.

Discussion: We examine the development of concepts of sustainability, and respond to two frequent assumptions -'voltage drop,' whereby interventions are expected to yield lower benefits as they move from efficacy to effectiveness to implementation and sustainability, and 'program drift,' whereby deviation from manualized protocols is assumed to decrease benefit. We posit that these assumptions limit opportunities to improve care, and instead argue for understanding the changing context of healthcare to continuously refine and improve interventions as they are sustained. Sustainability has evolved from being considered as the endgame of a translational research process to a suggested 'adaptation phase' that integrates and institutionalizes interventions within local organizational and cultural contexts. These recent approaches locate sustainability in the implementation phase of knowledge transfer, but still do not address intervention improvement as a central theme. We propose a Dynamic Sustainability Framework that involves: continued learning and problem solving, ongoing adaptation of interventions with a primary focus on fit between interventions and multi-level contexts, and expectations for ongoing improvement as opposed to diminishing outcomes over time.

Summary: A Dynamic Sustainability Framework provides a foundation for research, policy and practice that supports development and testing of falsifiable hypotheses and continued learning to advance the implementation, transportability and impact of health services research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Program drift and voltage drop. Illustrating the concepts of 'program drift,’ in which the expected effect of an intervention is presumed to decrease over time as practitioners adapt the delivery of the intervention (A), and 'voltage drop,’ in which the effect of an intervention is presumed to decrease as testing moves from Efficacy to Effectiveness to Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research stages (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The dynamic sustainability framework. Illustrating the goal of maximizing the fit between interventions, practice settings, and the broader ecological system over time (represented by T0, T1,…,Tn), each of which has constituent components that may vary.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Using the dynamic sustainability framework as an engine for quality improvement. The DSF depicts a dynamic view of sustainability, which allows for the evolution of an intervention within a changing delivery system. The changes in the shape of the puzzle pieces and of the contexts reflects the ongoing change to interventions, practice settings, and care systems, and shows the use of quality improvement methods to optimize the 'fit’ and improve the public health benefit of sustained use of interventions.

References

    1. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F. et al.Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
    1. Glasgow RE, Chambers D. Developing Robust, Sustainable. Implementation systems using rigorous, rapid, and relevant science. Clin Transl Sci. 2012;5(1):48–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00383.x.
    1. Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(10):724–732.
    1. Flay BR. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med. 1986;15:451–474. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90024-1.
    1. Greenwald P, Cullen JW. The new emphasis in cancer control. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985;74:543–551.
    1. Stirman SW, Kimberly J, Cook N. et al.The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.
    1. Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM, Onken LS. A stage model of behavioral therapies research: getting started and moving on from stage 1. Clin Psychol. 2001;8(2):133–142.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National institutes of health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1274–1281. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755.
    1. Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire J, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(2):117–123. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:4–23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
    1. Kilbourne AM, Neumann MS, Pincus HA. et al.Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci. 2007;2:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-42.
    1. Weisz JR, Kazdin AE. Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. New York: Guildford Press; 2010.
    1. Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):637–644. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.023.
    1. Kaitin KI. Deconstructing the drug development process: the new face of innovation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(3):356–361. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.293.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S. et al.Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
    1. Prochaska JO, Evers KE, Prochaska JM. et al.Efficacy and effectiveness trials: examples from smoking cessation and bullying prevention. J Health Psychol. 2007;112(1):170–178.
    1. COMMIT Research Group. Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): summary of design and intervention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991;83:1620–1628.
    1. Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF, Etz RS. et al.Fidelity versus flexibility: translating evidence-base research into practice. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:S381–S389. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.005.
    1. Glisson C, Schoenwald SK, Hemmelgarn A. et al.Randomized trial of MST and ARC in a two-level evidence-based treatment implementation strategy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(4):537–550.
    1. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. New York: OUP; 2012.
    1. Chambers DA. Advancing sustainability research: challenging existing paradigms. Public Health Dent. 2011;1(71):S99–100.
    1. Shediac-Rizkallah MC, Bone LR. Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res. 1998;13(1):87–108. doi: 10.1093/her/13.1.87.
    1. Scheirer MA. Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. Am J Eval. 2005;26(3):320–347. doi: 10.1177/1098214005278752.
    1. Scheirer MA, Dearing JW. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(11):2059–2067. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300193.
    1. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev. 1983;48(2):147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101.
    1. Ory MG, Lee SM, Mier N. et al.The science of sustaining health behavior change: the health maintenance consortium. Am J Health Behav. 2010;34(6):647–659.
    1. Swerissen H, Crisp BC. The sustainability of health promotion interventions for different levels of social organization. Health Promot Interv. 2004;19(1):123–130. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah113.
    1. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5(4):401–416. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00209.x.
    1. Duckers ML, Wagner C, Vos L. et al.Understanding organisational development, sustainability, and diffusion of innovations within hospitals participating in a multilevel quality collaborative. Implementation science. 2011;6(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-18.
    1. Glasgow RE, Green LW, Taylor M. et Evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):646–654. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.016.
    1. Wandersman A, Imm P, Chinman M, Getting to Outcomes: Methods and tools for planning, evaluation and accountability. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention; 1999.
    1. Estabrooks PA, Smith-Ray RL, Dzewaltoski DA. et al.Sustainability of evidence-based community-based physical activity programs for older adults: lessons from Active for Life. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1(2):1–8.
    1. Wilson KD, Kurz RS. Bridging implementation and institutionalization within organizations: proposed employment of continuous quality improvement to further dissemination. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(2):109–116. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311887.06252.5f.
    1. McLaughlin CP, Kaluzny AD. Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2004.
    1. Homer JB, Hirsch GB. Systems dynamics modeling for public health: background and opportunities. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):452–458. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.062059.
    1. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323:625–628. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625.
    1. Ebi K. Climate change and health risks: assessing and responding to them through 'adaptive management. Health Aff. 2011;30(5):924–30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0071.
    1. Bushe GR, Marshak RJ. Revisioning organizational development: diagnostic and dialogic premises and patterns of practice. J Appl Behav Sci. 2009;45(3):348–368. doi: 10.1177/0021886309335070.
    1. Checkland P. Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Res. 2000;17:S11–S58. doi: 10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>;2-O.
    1. Stange KC, Breslau ES, Dietrich AJ. et al.State-of-the-art and future directions in multilevel interventions across the cancer control continuum. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012;44:20–31.
    1. Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2008;25(Supp 1):i20–i24.
    1. Bughlin J, Chui M, Johnson B. The next step in open innovation. 2012. (The McKinsey Quarterly). . Accessed.
    1. Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Glasgow RE, Am J Prev Med. 2012. pp. 639–45.
    1. Etheredge LM. A rapid-learning health system: what would a rapid-learning health system look like, and how might we get there. Health Aff. 2007. Web Exclusive Collection(26):w107-w118 (Published ahead of print January 26, 2007, doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w107.
    1. Meissner HI, Vernon SW, Rimer BK, Wilson KM, Rakowski W, Briss PA. et al.The future of research that promotes cancer screening. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):1251–9.
    1. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science. 2009;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
    1. Glasgow RE, Kaplan R, Ockene J. Society of Behavioral Medicine Health Policy Committee et al.Patient-reported measures of psychosocial issues and health behavior should be added to electronic health records. Health Affairs. 2012;31(3):497–504. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1295.
    1. Tanenbaum S. Evidence-based practice as mental health policy: three controversies and a caveat. Health Aff. 2005;24(1):163–173. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.163.
    1. Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S. et al.Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci. 2012;7:119. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-119.
    1. Estabrooks P, Glasgow RE, Dzewaltowski DA. Physical activity promotion through primary care. JAMA. 2003;289(22):2913–2916. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2913.
    1. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations (4th Edition) New York: Free Press; 1995.
    1. Senge PM, Kleiner A, Roberts C, The dance of change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. 1. New York: Currency/Doubleday; 1999.
    1. Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26:1–7.
    1. Institute of Medicine. A foundation for evidence-driven practice: A rapid learning system for cancer care. Workshop Summary. Washington, D.C: NAS Press; 2010.
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74:511–544. doi: 10.2307/3350391.
    1. Unutzer J, Powers D, Katon W. From establishing an evidence-based practice to implementation in real-world settings: IMPACT as a case study. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005;28(4):1079–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2005.09.001.
    1. Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B. et al.Integrated personal health records: Transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8(45):1–14.
    1. PatientsLikeMe. PatientsLikeMe website. 2012. . Accessed March 15, 2012.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Consensus Report. Washington, D.C: NAS Press; 2012.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться