Efficacy of Mobile Apps to Support the Care of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Bráulio Cezar Bonoto, Vânia Eloisa de Araújo, Isabella Piassi Godói, Lívia Lovato Pires de Lemos, Brian Godman, Marion Bennie, Leonardo Mauricio Diniz, Augusto Afonso Guerra Junior, Bráulio Cezar Bonoto, Vânia Eloisa de Araújo, Isabella Piassi Godói, Lívia Lovato Pires de Lemos, Brian Godman, Marion Bennie, Leonardo Mauricio Diniz, Augusto Afonso Guerra Junior

Abstract

Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease that is considered a global public health problem. Education and self-monitoring by diabetic patients help to optimize and make possible a satisfactory metabolic control enabling improved management and reduced morbidity and mortality. The global growth in the use of mobile phones makes them a powerful platform to help provide tailored health, delivered conveniently to patients through health apps.

Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of mobile apps through a systematic review and meta-analysis to assist DM patients in treatment.

Methods: We conducted searches in the electronic databases MEDLINE (Pubmed), Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), including manual search in references of publications that included systematic reviews, specialized journals, and gray literature. We considered eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted after 2008 with participants of all ages, patients with DM, and users of apps to help manage the disease. The meta-analysis of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was performed in Review Manager software version 5.3.

Results: The literature search identified 1236 publications. Of these, 13 studies were included that evaluated 1263 patients. In 6 RCTs, there were a statistical significant reduction (P<.05) of HbA1c at the end of studies in the intervention group. The HbA1c data were evaluated by meta-analysis with the following results (mean difference, MD -0.44; CI: -0.59 to -0.29; P<.001; I²=32%).The evaluation favored the treatment in patients who used apps without significant heterogeneity.

Conclusions: The use of apps by diabetic patients could help improve the control of HbA1c. In addition, the apps seem to strengthen the perception of self-care by contributing better information and health education to patients. Patients also become more self-confident to deal with their diabetes, mainly by reducing their fear of not knowing how to deal with potential hypoglycemic episodes that may occur.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; mobile applications; self-care; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Bráulio Cezar Bonoto, Vânia Eloisa de Araújo, Isabella Piassi Godói, Lívia Lovato Pires de Lemos, Brian Godman, Marion Bennie, Leonardo Mauricio Diniz, Augusto Afonso Guerra Junior. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 01.03.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of selection of references to systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analysis of the risk of bias.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest-plot of glycated hemoglobin of diabetes patients who used a health app and have access physically or remotelly to health professionals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of glycated hemoglobin of diabetes patients who used a health app according to the number of selected app features.

References

    1. American Diabetes Association Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1033–46. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2625.
    1. Morrish NJ, Wang SL, Stevens LK, Fuller JH, Keen H. Mortality and causes of death in the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2001 Sep;44(Suppl 2):S14–21.
    1. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO; 2014. Global status report on non-communicable diseases .
    1. International Diabetes Federation. 2015. [2016-07-04]. IDF Diabetes Atlas, Seventh Edition .
    1. World Health Organization. [2015-08-30]. About diabetes
    1. Cramer JA, Benedict A, Muszbek N, Keskinaslan A, Khan ZM. The significance of compliance and persistence in the treatment of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: a review. Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jan;62(1):76–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01630.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01630.x.
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998 Sep 12;317(7160):703–13.
    1. Fernandez-Arias M, Acuna-Villaorduna A, Miranda JJ, Diez-Canseco F, Malaga G. Adherence to pharmacotherapy and medication-related beliefs in patients with hypertension in Lima, Peru. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e112875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112875.
    1. Gwadry-Sridhar FH, Manias E, Lal L, Salas M, Hughes DA, Ratzki-Leewing A, Grubisic M. Impact of interventions on medication adherence and blood pressure control in patients with essential hypertension: a systematic review by the ISPOR medication adherence and persistence special interest group. Value Health. 2013 Jul;16(5):863–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1631.
    1. McKee M, Chow CK. Improving health outcomes: innovation, coverage, quality and adherence. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012;1(1):43. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-1-43.
    1. DCCT Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
    1. International Diabetes Federation. 2011. [2015-08-30]. Diabetes Self-Management Education: A Right for All .
    1. Whitehead L, Seaton P. The Effectiveness of Self-Management Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps in Long-term Condition Management: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(5):e97. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4883.
    1. Goyal S, Morita P, Lewis GF, Yu C, Seto E, Cafazzo JA. The Systematic Design of a Behavioural Mobile Health Application for the Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2016 Feb;40(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.06.007.
    1. Sepah SC, Jiang L, Peters AL. Long-term outcomes of a Web-based diabetes prevention program: 2-year results of a single-arm longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e92. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4052.
    1. Torbjørnsen A, Jenum AK, Småstuen MC, Arsand E, Holmen H, Wahl AK, Ribu L. A Low-Intensity Mobile Health Intervention With and Without Health Counseling for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 1: Baseline and Short-Term Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Norwegian Part of RENEWING HEALTH. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;2(4):e52. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3535.
    1. Montori VM, Helgemoe PK, Guyatt GH, Dean DS, Leung TW, Smith SA, Kudva YC. Telecare for patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1088–94.
    1. Piette JD. Interactive behavior change technology to support diabetes self-management: where do we stand? Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct;30(10):2425–32. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1046.
    1. Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas EA. Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2009 Apr;15(3):231–40. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0099.
    1. Lee E, Tatara N, Arsand E, Hartvigsen G. Review of mobile terminal-based tools for diabetes diet management. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:23–7.
    1. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, Cao J, Chen J, Mo X, Huang J, Wang L, Gu D. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011 Apr;28(4):455–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03180.x.
    1. Mulvaney SA, Ritterband LM, Bosslet L. Mobile intervention design in diabetes: review and recommendations. Curr Diab Rep. 2011 Dec;11(6):486–93. doi: 10.1007/s11892-011-0230-y.
    1. Wei J, Hollin I, Kachnowski S. A review of the use of mobile phone text messaging in clinical and healthy behaviour interventions. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):41–8. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100322.
    1. Holtz B, Lauckner C. Diabetes management via mobile phones: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2012 Apr;18(3):175–84. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0119.
    1. Smith A. Pew Research Center. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2012. [2016-07-04]. Nearly half of American adults are smartphone owners
    1. Research2guidance. [2016-06-15]. 500m people will be using healthcare mobile applications in 2015
    1. Khalaf S. Flurry Insights. 2014. [2015-08-30]. Health and Fitness Apps Finally Take Off, Fueled by Fitness fanatics .
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
    1. Lobo Web Usability Guidelines For Smartphones: A Synergic Approach. IJIEE. 2011;1(1):33–37. doi: 10.7763/IJIEE.2011.V1.5.
    1. Woodroffe R, Yao GL, Meads C, Bayliss S, Ready A, Raftery J, Taylor RS. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation: a systematic review and modelling study. Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(21):1–179, iii.
    1. Higgins JA, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies.
    1. Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML, Barr EA, Ballew SH, Gruber-Baldini AL. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):1934–42. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0366.
    1. Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML, Barr EA, Park D, Shaikh F, Guralnik JM, Gruber-Baldini AL. Mobile Diabetes Intervention for Glycemic Control in 45- to 64-Year-Old Persons With Type 2 Diabetes. J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Feb;35(2):227–43. doi: 10.1177/0733464814542611.
    1. Hsu WC, Lau KH, Huang R, Ghiloni S, Le H, Gilroy S, Abrahamson M, Moore J. Utilization of a Cloud-Based Diabetes Management Program for Insulin Initiation and Titration Enables Collaborative Decision Making Between Healthcare Providers and Patients. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18(2):59–67. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0160.
    1. Rossi MC, Nicolucci A, Lucisano G, Pellegrini F, Di BP, Miselli V, Anichini R, Vespasiani G, Did SG. Impact of the “Diabetes Interactive Diary” telemedicine system on metabolic control, risk of hypoglycemia, and quality of life: a randomized clinical trial in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Aug;15(8):670–9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0021.
    1. Castelnuovo G, Manzoni GM, Cuzziol P, Cesa GL, Corti S, Tuzzi C, Villa V, Liuzzi A, Petroni ML, Molinari E. TECNOB Study: Ad Interim Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multidisciplinary Telecare Intervention for Obese Patients with Type-2 Diabetes. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2011;7:44–50. doi: 10.2174/1745017901107010044.
    1. Ho GY, Cattermole GN, Chan SS, Smith BE, Graham CA, Rainer TH. Noninvasive transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound-derived hemodynamic reference ranges in Chinese adolescents. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun;14(5):e225–32. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182772f78.
    1. Holmen H, Torbjørnsen A, Wahl AK, Jenum AK, Småstuen MC, Arsand E, Ribu L. A Mobile Health Intervention for Self-Management and Lifestyle Change for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 2: One-Year Results From the Norwegian Randomized Controlled Trial RENEWING HEALTH. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;2(4):e57. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3882.
    1. Berndt R, Takenga C, Preik P, Kuehn S, Berndt L, Mayer H, Kaps A, Schiel R. Impact of information technology on the therapy of type-1 diabetes: a case study of children and adolescents in Germany. J Pers Med. 2014;4(2):200–17. doi: 10.3390/jpm4020200.
    1. Orsama A, Lähteenmäki J, Harno K, Kulju M, Wintergerst E, Schachner H, Stenger P, Leppänen J, Kaijanranta H, Salaspuro V, Fisher WA. Active assistance technology reduces glycosylated hemoglobin and weight in individuals with type 2 diabetes: results of a theory-based randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Aug;15(8):662–9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0056.
    1. Kirwan M, Vandelanotte C, Fenning A, Duncan MJ. Diabetes self-management smartphone application for adults with type 1 diabetes: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e235. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2588.
    1. Drion I, Pameijer LR, van Dijk PR, Groenier KH, Kleefstra N, Bilo HJG. The Effects of a Mobile Phone Application on Quality of Life in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 May 11;9(5):1086–1091. doi: 10.1177/1932296815585871.
    1. Charpentier G, Benhamou P, Dardari D, Clergeot A, Franc S, Schaepelynck-Belicar P, Catargi B, Melki V, Chaillous L, Farret A, Bosson J, Penfornis A, TeleDiab SG. The Diabeo software enabling individualized insulin dose adjustments combined with telemedicine support improves HbA1c in poorly controlled type 1 diabetic patients: a 6-month, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter trial (TeleDiab 1 Study) Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar;34(3):533–9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1259.
    1. Rossi MC, Nicolucci A, Di BP, Bruttomesso D, Girelli A, Ampudia FJ, Kerr D, Ceriello A, Mayor C, Pellegrini F, Horwitz D, Vespasiani G. Diabetes Interactive Diary: a new telemedicine system enabling flexible diet and insulin therapy while improving quality of life: an open-label, international, multicenter, randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):109–15. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1327.
    1. Ministério da Saúde. Brasília: 2013. [2016-07-04]. Estratégias para o cuidado da pessoa com doença crônica: diabetes mellitus .
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837–53.
    1. American Diabetes Association Implications of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care. 2003 Jan;26(suppl 1):S25–S27. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.S25.
    1. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, Miyata T, Isami S, Motoyoshi S, Kojima Y, Furuyoshi N, Shichiri M. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995 May;28(2):103–17.
    1. Irwig L, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis C, Lau J, Colditz G, Chalmers TC, Mosteller F. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Apr 15;120(8):667–76.
    1. Fisher M, Friedman SB, Strauss B. The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):143–6.
    1. mhealtheconomics. [2015-08-30]. Developed to research2guidance
    1. Statista. [2015-08-29]. Share of mobile phone users that use a smartphone in Brazil from 2011 to 2017
    1. Statista. [2015-08-29]. Number of mobile phone users in Brazil from 2011 to 2018 (in millions)
    1. The World Bank. [2015-08-29]. Internet users (per 100 people) .
    1. Holzinger A, Searle G, Nischelwitzer A. On some aspects of improving mobile applications for the elderly. In: Stephanidis C, editor. Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. pp. 923–932.
    1. Lorenz A, Oppermann R, Zahl L, Mielke D. Personalized mobile health monitoring for elderly. 9th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services; September 09-12, 2007; Singapore. 2007.
    1. Mallenius S, Rossi M, Tuunainen VK. USC. 2010. Factors affecting the adoption and use of mobile devices and services by elderly people? results from a pilot study .
    1. Lorenz A, Oppermann R. Mobile health monitoring for the elderly: Designing for diversity. Pervasive Mob Comput. 2008 Oct 15;5(5):478–495. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2008.09.010.
    1. Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, Wong YK. Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int J Med Inform. 2009 Dec;78(12):788–801. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.001.
    1. Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. MIS Quarterly. 2000 Mar;24(1):115–139. doi: 10.2307/3250981.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться