Effect of tofacitinib on dactylitis and patient-reported outcomes in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: post-hoc analysis of phase III studies

Ana-Maria Orbai, Philip J Mease, Philip S Helliwell, Oliver FitzGerald, Dona L Fleishaker, Rajiv Mundayat, Pamela Young, Ana-Maria Orbai, Philip J Mease, Philip S Helliwell, Oliver FitzGerald, Dona L Fleishaker, Rajiv Mundayat, Pamela Young

Abstract

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This post-hoc analysis of two phase III studies in patients with PsA treated with tofacitinib assessed dactylitis by location, and the impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods: Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo. Endpoints included change from baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS), proportions of patients with dactylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), and PROs (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI]; Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-F]; Short Form-36 Health Survey [SF-36] Physical Component Summary [PCS], Mental Component Summary [MCS], and physical functioning [PF]; arthritis pain; and Work Limitations Questionnaire [WLQ]). Descriptive statistics were generated by visit and treatment. Change from baseline in PROs were evaluated by multivariate linear regression.

Results: The analysis included 373/337 patients with baseline DSS > 0/DSS = 0. Regardless of location, DSS improvements in patients with DSS > 0 were greater from month 1 with tofacitinib (10 mg BID) versus placebo. For patients with DSS > 0/DSS = 0, both doses of tofacitinib led to mean dactylitis presence ≤ 15%/< 2% for all digits at month 6, and PASDAS (by dactylitis location) was lower versus placebo at month 3. Dactylitis location was not significantly associated with change from baseline in PROs.

Conclusion: Tofacitinib resulted in sustained improvements in dactylitis irrespective of location, with minimal emergence of new dactylitis. Trial registration NCT01877668; NCT01882439.

Keywords: Dactylitis; Patient-reported outcomes; Psoriatic arthritis; Spondyloarthritis; Tofacitinib.

Conflict of interest statement

A-M Orbai has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Horizon, Janssen, and Novartis; and is a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB. PJ Mease has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sun, and UCB; is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sun, and UCB; and has been on speakers’ bureaus for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB. PS Helliwell has received consulting fees from Eli Lilly; and has received fees for educational services from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer Inc. O FitzGerald has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB; has received consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Pfizer Inc; and has been on speakers’ bureaus for AbbVie, Janssen, and Pfizer Inc. DL Fleishaker, R Mundayat, and P Young are employees and shareholders of Pfizer Inc.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Change from baseline in DSS and dactylitic digits count (patients with baseline DSS > 0). Data for a DSS and b dactylitis digit count were stratified by dactylitis location and pooled from OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond. *Comparisons where the 95% CI for tofacitinib does not overlap with the 95% CI for placebo. Dactylitis was defined as swelling of an entire digit; DSS ranged from 0 to 60 (60 = highest dactylitis severity) [20]. BID twice daily, CI confidence interval, DSS Dactylitis Severity Score, N total number of patients with DSS > 0 at baseline, n number of patients applicable for each category
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of patients with dactylitis stratified by location (patients with baseline DSS > 0). Data for a right hand fingers, b left hand fingers, c right foot toes, and d left foot toes were pooled from OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond. *Comparisons where the 95% CI for tofacitinib does not overlap with the 95% CI for placebo. Dactylitis was defined as swelling of an entire digit; DSS ranged from 0 to 60 (60 = highest dactylitis severity) [20]. BID twice daily, CI confidence interval, DSS Dactylitis Severity Score, N total number of patients with DSS > 0 at baseline, n number of patients applicable for each category
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PASDAS by dactylitis location in patients with DSS > 0 or DSS = 0 at baseline. Data for patients with a DSS > 0 and b DSS = 0 at baseline were pooled from OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond. *Comparisons where the 95% CI for tofacitinib does not overlap with the 95% CI for placebo. Dactylitis was defined as swelling of an entire digit; DSS ranged from 0 to 60 (60 = highest dactylitis severity) [20]. BID twice daily, CI confidence interval, DSS Dactylitis Severity Score, N total number of patients, PASDAS Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change from baseline in HAQ-DI scores and response rates. Change from baseline data in a HAQ-DI score and b HAQ-DI response rate† by dactylitis location in patients with DSS > 0 at baseline; and c HAQ-DI score and d HAQ-DI response rate†, in patients with DSS = 0 at baseline were pooled from OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond. *Comparisons where the 95% CI for tofacitinib does not overlap with the 95% CI for placebo. †Defined as ≥ 0.35-point decrease from baseline in HAQ-DI score. Dactylitis was defined as swelling of an entire digit; DSS ranged from 0 to 60 (60 = highest dactylitis severity) [20]. BID twice daily, CI confidence interval, DSS Dactylitis Severity Score, HAQ-DI Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, N total number of patients, n number of patients applicable for each category

References

    1. Ritchlin CT, Colbert RA, Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(10):957–970. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505557.
    1. Gladman DD, Antoni C, Mease P, Clegg DO, Nash P. Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(Suppl 2):ii14–ii17.
    1. Mease PJ, Armstrong AW. Managing patients with psoriatic disease: the diagnosis and pharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis. Drugs. 2014;74(4):423–441. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0191-y.
    1. Kavanaugh A, Helliwell P, Ritchlin CT. Psoriatic arthritis and burden of disease: patient perspectives from the population-based Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (MAPP) survey. Rheumatol Ther. 2016;3(1):91–102. doi: 10.1007/s40744-016-0029-z.
    1. Rosen CF, Mussani F, Chandran V, Eder L, Thavaneswaran A, Gladman DD. Patients with psoriatic arthritis have worse quality of life than those with psoriasis alone. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51(3):571–576. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker365.
    1. Kaeley GS, Eder L, Aydin SZ, Gutierrez M, Bakewell C. Dactylitis: a hallmark of psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48(2):263–273. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.02.002.
    1. Gladman DD, Ziouzina O, Thavaneswaran A, Chandran V. Dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis: prevalence and response to therapy in the biologic era. J Rheumatol. 2013;40(8):1357–1359. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130163.
    1. Brockbank JE, Stein M, Schentag CT, Gladman DD. Dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis: a marker for disease severity? Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(2):188–190. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.018184.
    1. Orbai AM, de Wit M, Mease P, Shea JA, Gossec L, Leung YY, et al. International patient and physician consensus on a psoriatic arthritis core outcome set for clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(4):673–680. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210242.
    1. Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, Soriano ER, Acosta-Felquer ML, Armstrong AW, et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(5):1060–1071.
    1. Helliwell PS. Therapies for dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis. A systematic review. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(7):1439–1441.
    1. Antoni C, Krueger GG, de Vlam K, Birbara C, Beutler A, Guzzo C, et al. Infliximab improves signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis: results of the IMPACT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(8):1150–1157. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.032268.
    1. Antoni CE, Kavanaugh A, Kirkham B, Tutuncu Z, Burmester GR, Schneider U, et al. Sustained benefits of infliximab therapy for dermatologic and articular manifestations of psoriatic arthritis: results from the infliximab multinational psoriatic arthritis controlled trial (IMPACT) Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(4):1227–1236. doi: 10.1002/art.20967.
    1. Gladman DD, Sampalis JS, Illouz O, Guérette B. Responses to adalimumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who have not adequately responded to prior therapy: effectiveness and safety results from an open-label study. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(9):1898–1906. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100069.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. XELJANZ® (tofacitinib) highlights of prescribing information. . Accessed 22 Jan 2022.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Tofacitinib (Xeljanz): summary of product characteristics. 2019. . Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
    1. Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O, van der Heijde D, Merola JF, Avila-Zapata F, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo for psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(16):1537–1550. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615975.
    1. Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF, Behrens F, Blanco R, Kaszuba A, et al. Tofacitinib for psoriatic arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(16):1525–1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615977.
    1. Nash P, Coates LC, Fleishaker D, Kivitz AJ, Mease PJ, Gladman DD, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib up to 48 months in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: final analysis of the OPAL Balance long-term extension study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021;3(4):E270–E283. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00010-2.
    1. Helliwell PS, Firth J, Ibrahim GH, Melsom RD, Shah I, Turner DE. Development of an assessment tool for dactylitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(9):1745–1750.
    1. Helliwell PS, FitzGerald O, Fransen J, Gladman DD, Kreuger GG, Callis-Duffin K, et al. The development of candidate composite disease activity and responder indices for psoriatic arthritis (GRACE project) Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(6):986–991. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201341.
    1. Helliwell PS, FitzGerald O, Fransen J. Composite disease activity and responder indices for psoriatic arthritis: a report from the GRAPPA 2013 meeting on development of cutoffs for both disease activity states and response. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(6):1212–1217. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140172.
    1. Bruce B, Fries JF. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5 Suppl 39):S14–S18.
    1. Mease PJ, Woolley JM, Bitman B, Wang BC, Globe DR, Singh A. Minimally important difference of Health Assessment Questionnaire in psoriatic arthritis: relating thresholds of improvement in functional ability to patient-rated importance and satisfaction. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(11):2461–2465. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110546.
    1. Chandran V, Bhella S, Schentag C, Gladman DD. Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale is valid in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(7):936–939. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.065763.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Maruish ME. User's manual for the SF-36v2 health survey. 2. Lincoln: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2007.
    1. Strand V, Boers M, Idzerda L, Kirwan JR, Kvien TK, Tugwell PS, et al. It's good to feel better but it's better to feel good and even better to feel good as soon as possible for as long as possible. Response criteria and the importance of change at OMERACT 10. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(8):1720–7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110392.
    1. Strand V, Sharp V, Koenig AS, Park G, Shi Y, Wang B, et al. Comparison of health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis and effects of etanercept treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(7):1143–1150. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200387.
    1. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Chernoff M, Fried B, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36(6):729–740. doi: 10.1002/art.1780360601.
    1. Lerner D, Amick BC, 3rd, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D. The work limitations questionnaire. Med Care. 2001;39(1):72–85. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200101000-00009.
    1. Lerner D, Chang H, Rogers WH, Benson C, Schein J, Allaire S. A method for imputing the impact of health problems on at-work performance and productivity from available health data. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51(5):515–524. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a82517.
    1. Gladman DD, Orbai A-M, Klitz U, Wei JC-C, Gallo G, Birt J, et al. Ixekizumab and complete resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis: integrated analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials in psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1831-0.
    1. Sondag M, Verhoeven F, Guillot X, Prati C, Wendling D. Efficacy of new treatments for dactylitis of psoriatic arthritis: update of literature review. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(2):591–596. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4328-3.
    1. Rose S, Toloza S, Bautista-Molano W, Helliwell PS, GRAPPA Dactylitis Study Group Comprehensive treatment of dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(11):2295–300. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140879.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться