One-Year Results From the SURPASS Observational Registry of the CTAG Stent-Graft With the Active Control System

Giovanni Federico Torsello, Angeliki Argyriou, Konstantinos Stavroulakis, Michel J Bosiers, Martin Austermann, Giovanni B Torsello, SURPASS Registry Collaborators, Manuel Alonso Pérez, Dittmar Böckler, Stefano Bonardelli, Jan Brunkwall, Nabil Chakfé, Giovanni Dialetto, Jorge Fernandez Noya, Robin Heijmen, José Antonio Lechón Saz, Ian Loftus, Nicola Mangialardi, Simon McPherson, Bijan Modarai, Karin Pfister, Jean Picquet, Artai Pirouzram, Giovanni Torsello, Hence Verhagen, Anders Wanhainen, Kak Khee Yeung, Giovanni Federico Torsello, Angeliki Argyriou, Konstantinos Stavroulakis, Michel J Bosiers, Martin Austermann, Giovanni B Torsello, SURPASS Registry Collaborators, Manuel Alonso Pérez, Dittmar Böckler, Stefano Bonardelli, Jan Brunkwall, Nabil Chakfé, Giovanni Dialetto, Jorge Fernandez Noya, Robin Heijmen, José Antonio Lechón Saz, Ian Loftus, Nicola Mangialardi, Simon McPherson, Bijan Modarai, Karin Pfister, Jean Picquet, Artai Pirouzram, Giovanni Torsello, Hence Verhagen, Anders Wanhainen, Kak Khee Yeung

Abstract

Purpose: To report the outcomes from the observational SURPASS registry, which was created to assess the performance of the Conformable TAG (CTAG) stent-graft with the Active Control System (ACS) in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in a real-world setting. Materials and Methods: The SURPASS registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT03286400) was an observational, prospective, single-arm, post-market, international study that enrolled patients undergoing TEVAR using the CTAG with ACS for both acute and chronic thoracic aortic disease between October 2017 and July 2018. The CTAG with ACS features 2-stage deployment of the stent-graft and an optional angulation mechanism that modifies only the proximal end of the stent-graft. During the observation period, 127 patients (mean age 67.1±12.1 years, range 27-86; 92 men) were enrolled and treated for an array of aortic pathologies, including chronic and acute lesions and 4 ruptured descending thoracic aneurysms. The primary outcome of this study was technical success; secondary outcomes were clinical success and major adverse events at 30 days and 12 months. The numbers of 2-stage device deployments and applications of the angulation mechanism were recorded, along with the reasons for use. Results: Technical success of the TEVAR was 97.6% owing to unintentional partial coverage of supra-aortic branches in 3 cases (the vessels were patent on imaging). The stent-graft was repositioned at its intermediate diameter in 79 patients (62.2%), and the angulation feature was applied in 64 cases (50.4%), mainly to improve proximal wall apposition and orthogonality in the aorta. The desired effect was achieved in 60 cases (93.8%). There was no device compression, bird-beak configuration, fracture, or graft occlusion. The 30-day and 12-month clinical success rates were 97.6% and 92.9%, respectively. There were 3 aorta-related deaths at 30 days and a further 3 at 12 months. Fatalities were due to a retrograde type A dissection (0.8%), paraplegia, bowel ischemia, sepsis in the setting of a mycotic aneurysm, aneurysm rupture post aortoesophageal fistula, and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. Three endoleaks (2 type Ia and 1 type III) required reintervention. Conclusion: In the SURPASS registry, the use of the CTAG device with ACS showed promising outcomes despite the challenging pathologies. The new delivery system enables a controlled staged delivery with in situ adjustments during positioning, facilitating the treatment of complex aortic disease.

Keywords: aortic arch pathologies; chronic dissection; complications; conformability; endograft; endoleak; reintervention; stent-graft; thoracic aortic aneurysm; thoracic aortic aneurysms; thoracic endovascular aortic repair; type B aortic dissection.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A 54-year-old man with multiple comorbidities had a type B aortic dissection diagnosed in 2013 (4 years prior). (A) The last computed tomography angiogram (CTA) showed aneurysm growth to 6 cm maximum diameter in the descending thoracic aorta. (B) After angiography, a TGM 45-45-20E CTAG device was placed just distal to the left subclavian artery. (C) After deployment, a bird-beak configuration (white arrow) was detected. (D) The angulation control mechanism was used for a more complete apposition to the inner aortic curvature. In total, 3 devices were implanted, leaving the celiac trunk patent. (E) In the control CTA scan 12 months later, the stent-graft was aligned with the aorta and the aneurysm sac had shrunk.

References

    1. Walsh SR, Tang TY, Sadar U, et al. Endovascular stenting versus open surgery for thoracic aortic disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative results. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:1094–1098.
    1. Shah AA, Barfield EM, Andersen DN, et al. Results of thoracic endovascular repair 6 years after United States Food and Drug Administration Approval. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1394–1399.
    1. Fillinger M, Greenberg R, McKinsey J, et al. Reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1022–1033.
    1. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Spampinato B, Mazzaeo G, et al. Impact of the bird-beak configuration on postoperative outcome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2019;26:771–778.
    1. Cheng D, Martin J, Shennib H, et al. Endovascular aortic repair versus open surgical repair for descending thoracic aortic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:986–1001.
    1. Makaroun MS, Dillavou ED, Wheatly GH, et al.; Gore TAG Investigators. Five-year results of endovascular treatment with the Gore TAG device compared with open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:912–918.
    1. Reyes GME, Martins GG, Valenzuela FV, et al. Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair focused on bird-beak and oversizing in blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;50:140–147.
    1. Hsu HL, Chen CK, Chen PL, et al. The impact of bird-beak configuration on aortic remodeling of distal arch pathology after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the Zenith Pro-Form TX2 thoracic endograft. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:80–88.
    1. Canaud L, Alric P, Desgranges P, et al. Factors favoring stent graft collapse after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:1553–1557.
    1. Ueda T, Fleischmann D, Dake MD, et al. Incomplete endograft apposition to the aortic arch: bird-beak configuration increases risk of endoleak formation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Radiology. 2010;255:645–652.
    1. Boufi M, Guivier-Curien C, Deplano Y, et al. Risk factors analysis of bird beak occurrence after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50:37–43.
    1. Mariani C, van der Weijde E, Smith T, et al. The GORE TAG conformable thoracic stent graft with the new ACTIVE CONTROL deployment system. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:432–437.
    1. Böckler D, Brunkwall J, Taylor PR, et al.; CTAG Registry Investigators. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch pathologies with the Conformable Thoracic Aortic Graft: early and 2 year results from a European multicenter registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:791–800.
    1. Torsello GB, Torsello GF, Osada N, et al. Midterm results from the TRAVIATA registry: treatment of the thoracic aortic disease with the Valiant stent graft. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17:137–150.
    1. Heijmen RH, Thompson MM, Fattori R, et al. Valiant thoracic stent graft deployed with the new Captivia delivery system: Procedural and 30-day results of the Valiant Captivia registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19:213–225.
    1. Azizzadeh A, Desai N, Arko FR, 3rd, et al. Pivotal results for the Valiant Navion stent graft in the Valiant EVO global clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:1399–1408.e1.
    1. Torsello GF, Inchingolo M, Austermann M, et al. Durability of a low-profile stent graft for thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(6):1638–1643.
    1. Riambau V, Zipfel B, Coppi G, et al.; RELAY Endovascular Registry for Thoracic Disease RESTORE Investigators. Final operative and midterm results of the European experience in the RELAY Endovascular Registry for Thoracic Disease (RESTORE) study. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:565–573.
    1. Zipfel B, Zaefferer P, Riambau V, et al.; RESTORE II Study Group. Worldwide results from the RESTORE II on elective endografting of thoracic aneurysms and dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:1466–1475.
    1. Chen Y, Zhang S, Liu L, et al. Retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e004649.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться