Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules with Macrocalcification and Rim Calcification Based on Ultrasound Patterns

Hwa Seon Shin, Dong Gyu Na, Wooyul Paik, So Jin Yoon, Hye Yun Gwon, Byeong Joo Noh, Won Jun Kim, Hwa Seon Shin, Dong Gyu Na, Wooyul Paik, So Jin Yoon, Hye Yun Gwon, Byeong Joo Noh, Won Jun Kim

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association of macrocalcification and rim calcification with malignancy and to stratify the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules with macrocalcification and rim calcification based on ultrasound (US) patterns.

Materials and methods: The study included a total of 3603 consecutive nodules (≥ 1 cm) with final diagnoses. The associations of macrocalcification and rim calcification with malignancy and malignancy risk of the nodules were assessed overall and in subgroups based on the US patterns of the nodules. The malignancy risk of the thyroid nodules was categorized as high (> 50%), intermediate (upper-intermediate: > 30%, ≤ 50%; lower-intermediate: > 10%, ≤ 30%), and low (≤ 10%).

Results: Macrocalcification was independently associated with malignancy in all nodules and solid hypoechoic (SH) nodules (p < 0.001). Rim calcification was not associated with malignancy in all nodules (p = 0.802); however, it was independently associated with malignancy in partially cystic or isoechoic and hyperechoic (PCIH) nodules (p = 0.010). The malignancy risks of nodules with macrocalcification were classified as upper-intermediate and high in SH nodules, and as low and lower-intermediate in PCIH nodules based on suspicious US features. The malignancy risks of nodules with rim calcification were stratified as low and lower-intermediate based on suspicious US features.

Conclusion: Macrocalcification increased the malignancy risk in all and SH nodules with or without suspicious US features, with low to high malignancy risks depending on the US patterns. Rim calcification increased the malignancy risk in PCIH nodules, with low and lower-intermediate malignancy risks based on suspicious US features. However, the role of rim calcification in risk stratification of thyroid nodules remains uncertain.

Keywords: Calcification; Data systems; Risk assessment; Thyroid nodule; Ultrasonography.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology.

Figures

Fig. 1. Flow diagram of patient enrollment.…
Fig. 1. Flow diagram of patient enrollment. CNB = core needle biopsy, FNA = fine-needle aspiration, US = ultrasound
Fig. 2. A 55-year-old woman with a…
Fig. 2. A 55-year-old woman with a 1.2-cm right thyroid lobe nodule.
The ultrasound image shows solid hypoechoic nodule with macrocalcification with posterior shadowing (arrow). A final diagnosis of conventional papillary carcinoma was established based on surgical pathology findings.
Fig. 3. A 48-year-old woman with a…
Fig. 3. A 48-year-old woman with a 2.7-cm left thyroid lobe nodule.
The ultrasound image shows a solid, predominantly isoechoic nodule with incomplete rim calcification (short arrows) and a microcalcification (punctate echogenic foci) (long arrow). A final diagnosis of minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma was established based on surgical pathology findings.
Fig. 4. A 63-year-old woman with a…
Fig. 4. A 63-year-old woman with a 2.0-cm left thyroid lobe nodule.
The ultrasound image shows a solid hypoechoic nodule with incomplete rim calcification (short arrows) and suspicious ultrasound features of nonparallel orientation (taller than wide) and microcalcification (punctate echogenic foci) (long arrow), as well as multiple large echogenic foci. Findings from repeated ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations were nondiagnostic and core needle biopsy revealed benign follicular nodule with degeneration. A follow-up ultrasound performed 9 years after the initial fine-needle aspiration showed no change in the size of the nodule.

References

    1. Ha EJ, Lim HK, Yoon JH, Baek JH, Do KH, Choi M, et al. Primary imaging test and appropriate biopsy methods for thyroid nodules: guidelines by Korean Society of Radiology and National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Korean J Radiol. 2018;19:623–631.
    1. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–133.
    1. Shin JH, Baek JH, Chung J, Ha EJ, Kim JH, Lee YH, et al. Ultrasonography diagnosis and imaging-based management of thyroid nodules: revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17:370–395.
    1. Gharib H, Papini E, Garber JR, Duick DS, Harrell RM, Hegedüs L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Medical Guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules--2016 update. Endocr Pract. 2016;22:622–639.
    1. Russ G, Bonnema SJ, Erdogan MF, Durante C, Ngu R, Leenhardt L. European Thyroid Association guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules in adults: the EU-TIRADS. Eur Thyroid J. 2017;6:225–237.
    1. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:587–595.
    1. Frates MC, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Kunreuther E, Contreras M, Cibas ES, et al. Prevalence and distribution of carcinoma in patients with solitary and multiple thyroid nodules on sonography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:3411–3417.
    1. Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, Na DG, Baek JH, Lee YH, et al. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation--multicenter retrospective study. Radiology. 2008;247:762–770.
    1. Lu Z, Mu Y, Zhu H, Luo Y, Kong Q, Dou J, et al. Clinical value of using ultrasound to assess calcification patterns in thyroid nodules. World J Surg. 2011;35:122–127.
    1. Seo H, Na DG, Kim JH, Kim KW, Yoon JW. Ultrasound-based risk stratification for malignancy in thyroid nodules: a four-tier categorization system. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:2153–2162.
    1. Na DG, Baek JH, Sung JY, Kim JH, Kim JK, Choi YJ, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system risk stratification of thyroid nodules: categorization based on solidity and echogenicity. Thyroid. 2016;26:562–572.
    1. Zheng Y, Xu S, Kang H, Zhan W. A single-center retrospective validation study of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. Ultrasound Q. 2018;34:77–83.
    1. Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Reading CC, Langer JE, Beland MD, Szabunio MM, et al. Multiinstitutional analysis of thyroid nodule risk stratification using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:1331–1341.
    1. Wang Z, Zhang H, Zhang P, He L, Dong W. Diagnostic value of ultrasound-detected calcification in thyroid nodules. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2014;43:102–106.
    1. Na DG, Kim DS, Kim SJ, Ryoo JW, Jung SL. Thyroid nodules with isolated macrocalcification: malignancy risk and diagnostic efficacy of fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy. Ultrasonography. 2016;35:212–219.
    1. Seo HS, Lee DH, Park SH, Min HS, Na DG. Thyroid follicular neoplasms: can sonography distinguish between adenomas and carcinomas? J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;37:493–500.
    1. Kobayashi K, Fujimoto T, Ota H, Hirokawa M, Yabuta T, Masuoka H, et al. Calcifications in thyroid tumors on ultrasonography: calcification types and relationship with histopathological type. Ultrasound Int Open. 2018;4:E45–E51.
    1. Kuo TC, Wu MH, Chen KY, Hsieh MS, Chen A, Chen CN. Ultrasonographic features for differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma and follicular adenoma. Asian J Surg. 2019;43:339–346.
    1. Kim BM, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Hong SW, Son EJ, et al. Sonographic differentiation of thyroid nodules with eggshell calcifications. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:1425–1430.
    1. Park M, Shin JH, Han BK, Ko EY, Hwang HS, Kang SS, et al. Sonography of thyroid nodules with peripheral calcifications. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;37:324–328.
    1. Malhi HS, Velez E, Kazmierski B, Gulati M, Deurdulian C, Cen SY, et al. Peripheral thyroid nodule calcifications on sonography: evaluation of malignant potential. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213:672–675.
    1. Hoang JK, Middleton WD, Farjat AE, Teefey SA, Abinanti N, Boschini FJ, et al. Interobserver variability of sonographic features used in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:162–167.
    1. Malhi H, Beland MD, Cen SY, Allgood E, Daley K, Martin SE, et al. Echogenic foci in thyroid nodules: significance of posterior acoustic artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:1310–1316.
    1. Zayadeen AR, Abu-Yousef M, Berbaum K. JOURNAL CLUB: retrospective evaluation of ultrasound features of thyroid nodules to assess malignancy risk: a step toward TIRADS. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207:460–469.
    1. Ha SM, Chung YJ, Ahn HS, Baek JH, Park SB. Echogenic foci in thyroid nodules: diagnostic performance with combination of TIRADS and echogenic foci. BMC Med Imaging. 2019;19:28.
    1. Hiromura T, Tanaka YO, Nishioka T, Tomita K. Serous psammocarcinoma of the ovary: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:490–492.
    1. Ayala C, Healy GB, Robson CD, Vargas SO. Psammomatous calcification in association with a benign thyroglossal duct cyst. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:241–243.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться