Differences in Music Perception Skills Between Child, Teen and Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
10 juni 2013 uppdaterad av: University of Zurich
Adult recipients of cochlear implants (CI) generally loose interest in listening to music. This may be due to the rather limited spectral resolution of CI. However, child CI-recipients, if offered the opportunity, like to listen to music. They participate actively in musical acitivities, such as singing, dancing or playing an instrument. Thus, there seems to be a fundamental difference in the music perception of people who receive CI as child or as adult.
This study assesses music perception skills of child, teen and adult cochlear implant recipients in settings with simple tone sequences and in a more complex, melodious context.
Studieöversikt
Status
Avslutad
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Studietyp
Observationell
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
50
Kontakter och platser
Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.
Studieorter
-
-
ZH
-
Zurich, ZH, Schweiz, 8091
- University Hospital Zurich,
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
3 år till 70 år (Barn, Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)
Tar emot friska volontärer
Nej
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Allt
Testmetod
Icke-sannolikhetsprov
Studera befolkning
Healthy CI recipients that receive their regular follow-ups in the ENT-clinic of the Zurich University Hospital.
Beskrivning
Inclusion criteria:
- Participants are uni- or bilateral CI recipients.
- Participants are at least 3 years old.
- Participants received CI one or more years before.
- Participants are healthy.
- Participation in the study is voluntary.
- Participants and their legal custodians have read the information for participants at least one day prior to the test and given their written consent.
Exclusion criteria:
- Surgery for CI carried out less than one year before the test.
- Children less than 3 years old.
- Reduced cognitive capabilities due to old age.
- Physical or mental handicaps.
Studieplan
Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
Kohorter och interventioner
Grupp / Kohort |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Children aged 3 - 10 years
Assessment of music perception skills with cochlear implant recipients aged 3 - 10 years
|
A sequence of tones is presented to participants.
Then the same sequence is presented again, with the 4th tone being one to six half tones different from the first sequence.
Participants are asked to indicate when they hear a difference betweent the first and the second sequence.
|
|
Teenagers aged 11 - 15 years
Assessment of music perception skills with cochlear implant recipients aged 11 - 15 years
|
A sequence of tones is presented to participants.
Then the same sequence is presented again, with the 4th tone being one to six half tones different from the first sequence.
Participants are asked to indicate when they hear a difference betweent the first and the second sequence.
|
|
Adults aged 16 - 70 years
Assessment of music perception skills with cochlear implant recipients aged 16 - 70 years
|
A sequence of tones is presented to participants.
Then the same sequence is presented again, with the 4th tone being one to six half tones different from the first sequence.
Participants are asked to indicate when they hear a difference betweent the first and the second sequence.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Does the age at which a person receives a cochlear implant influence music perception skills?
Tidsram: Test and retest are taken within 6 months
|
The test assesses wether cochlear implant carriers are able to hear the difference betweent two sequences of sounds, where in the second sequence on tone is different from the first sequence. If a difference is perceived, then the test assesses how big this difference has to be in order to be heard. The first and the second test are no more than six months apart; both times the same procedure is followed. The test is carried out with three age groups:
|
Test and retest are taken within 6 months
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Do the results of the primary outcome measure depend on the tone sequence presented to the cochlear implant recipients?
Tidsram: Test and retest are no more than 6 months apart
|
The test is carried out with three different tone sequences:
|
Test and retest are no more than 6 months apart
|
Andra resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
How can the findings of the primary and the secondary outcome measure be used to improve music perception with existing cochlear implants?
Tidsram: 6 months
|
Can the results of the primary and the secondary outcome measure be applied to improve music perception with existing cochlear implants - e.g. by changing / adapting algorithms?
|
6 months
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.
Sponsor
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Dorothe Veraguth, MD, University Hospital Zurich, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.
Allmänna publikationer
- Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci. 2000 Mar;11(2):153-8. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00231.
- Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2005 May;203(1-2):134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.010.
- Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):303-4. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.303.
- Nicholas JG, Geers AE. Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age. Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):286-98. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6.
- Svirsky MA, Teoh SW, Neuburger H. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):224-33. doi: 10.1159/000078392.
- Fujita S, Ito J. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Jul;108(7 Pt 1):634-40. doi: 10.1177/000348949910800702.
- Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S. Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Nov;112(5 Pt 1):2155-64. doi: 10.1121/1.1506688.
- Peretz I, Hyde KL. What is specific to music processing? Insights from congenital amusia. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Aug;7(8):362-367. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00150-5.
- Fitzsimons M, Sheahan N, Staunton H. Gender and the integration of acoustic dimensions of prosody: implications for clinical studies. Brain Lang. 2001 Jul;78(1):94-108. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2448.
- K. Gfeller, S. A. Witt, L. J. Spencer, J. Stordahl and B. Tomblin (1999), Musical Involvement and Enjoyment of Children Who Use Cochlear Implants, Volta Review, 100(4), pp. 213-233
- Mitani C, Nakata T, Trehub SE, Kanda Y, Kumagami H, Takasaki K, Miyamoto I, Takahashi H. Music recognition, music listening, and word recognition by deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):29S-33S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031547a.
- Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):618-26. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174e787.
- Looi V, She J. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol. 2010 Feb;49(2):116-28. doi: 10.3109/14992020903405987.
- Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, Woodworth G, Fearn R, Knutson JF, Witt S, Stordahl J. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002 Mar;3(1):29-53. doi: 10.1179/cim.2002.3.1.29.
- Trehub SE, Cohen AJ, Thorpe LA, Morrongiello BA. Development of the perception of musical relations: semitone and diatonic structure. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Aug;12(3):295-301. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.3.295.
Studieavstämningsdatum
Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.
Studera stora datum
Studiestart
1 november 2011
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
1 juli 2012
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
1 juli 2012
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
10 juni 2013
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
10 juni 2013
Första postat (Uppskatta)
12 juni 2013
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Uppskatta)
12 juni 2013
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
10 juni 2013
Senast verifierad
1 maj 2013
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- VD_2011_11_15
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .