Comparison of the Vasomotor Function and Myocardial Flow in Patients Treated With Bioresorbable and Metallic Stents at 1 Year (BVS-Flow)
Comparison of the Vasomotor Function and Myocardial Flow in Patients Treated
Background: A total of 25-50% of patients with stable coronary atherosclerosis treated with metallic stent implantation remain with effort angina despite optimal medical treatment and absence of stent restenosis at 1 year. The most plausible cause of persistent effort angina after stent implantation is microcirculatory dysfunction. Coronary circulation matches the myocardial blood supply and oxygen consumption. Metallic stent implantation has been related with endothelial dysfunction and impaired coronary blood flow reserve (relation between coronary blood flow at rest and maximal hyperemia) of the treated vessel at 1 year.
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) has been shown to improve the endothelial function and to improve the angina symptoms at 1 year. However, the coronary blood flow of BVS has never been tested.
Main objective: To determine differences in the blood average peak velocity at maximal hyperemia with adenosine infusion between patients treated with bioresorbable and metallic coronary stents at 1 year after stent implantation.
Methodology: A total of 70 patients are 1:1 randomized to everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES) versus everolimus-eluting BVS implantation in patients with stable coronary disease. At 1 year, patients undergo to invasive coronary angiography prior cessation of vasomotor drugs. A pressure/Doppler wire is advanced distally to the "treated segment" and the endothelial (acetylcholine) and non-endothelial (adenosine and nitroglycerine) vasomotor function is assessed with quantitative coronary angiography and pressure and Doppler measurements. Angina test questionnaires are obtained at different time-points of the study.
Expected results: A difference between patients treated with BVS and EES of 12.0 cm/sc in the maximal average peak velocity (APV) under maximal hyperemia (with adenosine administration) is expected, as assessed by Doppler measurements, at 1 year after stent implantation. The study is powered to assess superiority in terms of maximal APV favoring patients treated with BVS.
Studieöversikt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Fas
- Fas 4
Kontakter och platser
Studieorter
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spanien, 08003
- Hospital Del Mar
-
Barcelona, Spanien, 08036
- Hospital Clinic
-
-
Barcelona
-
L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spanien, 08173
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
Tar emot friska volontärer
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with stable angina or silent angina with myocardial ischemia detected by non-invasive tests or patients with acute coronary syndromes with no increase of > 5 times the upper value of normality of cardiac biomarkers (troponin).
- Patients with coronary artery disease with angiographic stenosis >
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Övrig
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Enda
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS)
Patients with stable coronary angina with coronary artery disease suitable to be treated with a bioresorbable vascular scaffold.
|
Andra namn:
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Everolimus-eluting stent (EES)
Patients with stable coronary angina with coronary artery disease suitable to be treated with a Everolimus-eluting stent .
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Tidsram |
|---|---|
|
Difference in the average peak velocity at maximal hyperemia between bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and everolimus-eluting stents as assessed by doppler wire measurement.
Tidsram: 1-year after stent implantation
|
1-year after stent implantation
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Tidsram |
|---|---|
|
Difference in endothelial dysfunction with acetyl-choline infusion between bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and everolimus-eluting stents as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (4% of lumen reduction)
Tidsram: 1-year after stent implantation
|
1-year after stent implantation
|
Andra resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Tidsram |
|---|---|
|
Difference in fractional flow reserve at maximal hyperemia between the two treatment groups as assessed by pressure-wire measurement
Tidsram: 1-year after stent implantation
|
1-year after stent implantation
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Samarbetspartners
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Uppskatta)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- 20151810
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .