Comparison of the Vasomotor Function and Myocardial Flow in Patients Treated With Bioresorbable and Metallic Stents at 1 Year (BVS-Flow)
Comparison of the Vasomotor Function and Myocardial Flow in Patients Treated
Background: A total of 25-50% of patients with stable coronary atherosclerosis treated with metallic stent implantation remain with effort angina despite optimal medical treatment and absence of stent restenosis at 1 year. The most plausible cause of persistent effort angina after stent implantation is microcirculatory dysfunction. Coronary circulation matches the myocardial blood supply and oxygen consumption. Metallic stent implantation has been related with endothelial dysfunction and impaired coronary blood flow reserve (relation between coronary blood flow at rest and maximal hyperemia) of the treated vessel at 1 year.
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) has been shown to improve the endothelial function and to improve the angina symptoms at 1 year. However, the coronary blood flow of BVS has never been tested.
Main objective: To determine differences in the blood average peak velocity at maximal hyperemia with adenosine infusion between patients treated with bioresorbable and metallic coronary stents at 1 year after stent implantation.
Methodology: A total of 70 patients are 1:1 randomized to everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES) versus everolimus-eluting BVS implantation in patients with stable coronary disease. At 1 year, patients undergo to invasive coronary angiography prior cessation of vasomotor drugs. A pressure/Doppler wire is advanced distally to the "treated segment" and the endothelial (acetylcholine) and non-endothelial (adenosine and nitroglycerine) vasomotor function is assessed with quantitative coronary angiography and pressure and Doppler measurements. Angina test questionnaires are obtained at different time-points of the study.
Expected results: A difference between patients treated with BVS and EES of 12.0 cm/sc in the maximal average peak velocity (APV) under maximal hyperemia (with adenosine administration) is expected, as assessed by Doppler measurements, at 1 year after stent implantation. The study is powered to assess superiority in terms of maximal APV favoring patients treated with BVS.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- Fase 4
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Barcelona, España, 08003
- Hospital del Mar
-
Barcelona, España, 08036
- Hospital Clinic
-
-
Barcelona
-
L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España, 08173
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with stable angina or silent angina with myocardial ischemia detected by non-invasive tests or patients with acute coronary syndromes with no increase of > 5 times the upper value of normality of cardiac biomarkers (troponin).
- Patients with coronary artery disease with angiographic stenosis >
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Otro
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Único
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS)
Patients with stable coronary angina with coronary artery disease suitable to be treated with a bioresorbable vascular scaffold.
|
Otros nombres:
|
|
Comparador activo: Everolimus-eluting stent (EES)
Patients with stable coronary angina with coronary artery disease suitable to be treated with a Everolimus-eluting stent .
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
Difference in the average peak velocity at maximal hyperemia between bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and everolimus-eluting stents as assessed by doppler wire measurement.
Periodo de tiempo: 1-year after stent implantation
|
1-year after stent implantation
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
Difference in endothelial dysfunction with acetyl-choline infusion between bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and everolimus-eluting stents as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (4% of lumen reduction)
Periodo de tiempo: 1-year after stent implantation
|
1-year after stent implantation
|
Otras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
Difference in fractional flow reserve at maximal hyperemia between the two treatment groups as assessed by pressure-wire measurement
Periodo de tiempo: 1-year after stent implantation
|
1-year after stent implantation
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 20151810
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .