Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

The Application of the Flipped Model in the Nursing Process and Evaluation of Its Reflection in the Clinic

7 juli 2022 uppdaterad av: nesibeyagmur, Sakarya University

Application of the Web Program Based on the Flipped Model in Nursıng Process Teaching and Evaluation of Its Reflect to the Clinic

Teaching the nursing process that nursing students will use throughout their professional career is very important. In this direction, considering the Z generation, innovative and technology-based teaching methods should be used. Since the subject of the nursing process is the building block of nursing, its teaching should also be effective. The use of innovative and technology-based education methods that will increase the active participation of the students in the teaching of the nursing process, reinforce the learning, and encourage them to use problem-solving and critical thinking skills has been very important in recent years. For this reason, this research was planned to examine the effect of flipped learning(FL) on students' problem solving and critical thinking skills and their views on this model in nursing process teaching. In this study, it will be carried out with mixed method. In the quantitative part of the research, pre-test-post-test, experimental design with randomized control group will be used, and in the qualitative part, case study and phenomenological design will be used.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljerad beskrivning

Ethics committee approval was obtained from the Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine.In this study, it will be carried out with mixed method.

In the quantitative part of this research, pre-test-post-test, experimental design with randomized control group will be used, and in the qualitative part, case study and phenomenological design will be applied. Considering the losses as a result of the G-power analysis, the sample of the research was planned to consist of 23 students in the intervention group and 23 students in the control group. A stratified randomization process will be carried out by applying the pre-test data to the students who meet the inclusion criteria of the study.

In this study, FL will be applied to the intervention group for 5 weeks, while the traditional method will be applied to the control group for 5 weeks.

In the quantitative dimension of the research, critical thinking disposition scale and problem solving inventory will be used. A semi-structured interview form will be used in the qualitative aspect of the research.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

46

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

  • Kalkon
    • Serdivan
      • Sakarya, Serdivan, Kalkon, 54150
        • Nasibe Yağmur Ziyai

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

18 år till 24 år (Vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Ja

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

Not having seen the subject of the nursing process before

  • Adequate internet access
  • Being willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not willing to participate in the study

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Övrig
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Experimentell: Experimental Group
FL will be applied to the intervention group. In this model, short videos of the course will be delivered to students via WhatsApp one week in advance. At the beginning of the lesson, students' deficiencies will be corrected by making kahoot. Afterwards, group work, case scenario, role-play scenario and conceptual map methods will be applied in the course.
Övrig: Experimental
FL was applied by Jonathan Bergmann and Aaron Sams in 2007 for high school students who had to be absent from chemistry class. Bergmann and Sams published all the learning activities they used during the lesson as videos. Bergmann and Sams (2012) stated that in this model, which they developed over time, it is not compulsory for the trainer to explain the entire course content in the videos, and the important thing is to allocate time to active learning methods during the course. In the FL model, the summary of the course content is presented to the individuals outside the classroom with tools such as video and power point presentations. In the lesson, activities are carried out for the active participation of the student. The student performs the course content outside of the classroom, and the homework and learning the course in the classroom.
Inget ingripande: Control Group
The subject of the nursing process will be transferred to the control group with powerpoint presentations by the educator. The activities in the other group will be presented by the trainer as an example.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CTTS)
Tidsram: 5 weeks
In this study, the "Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CTTS)" developed by Semerci (2016) was used. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the CTTS scale was determined as 0.96. This scale consists of 49 items scaled as "I totally disagree (1)", I mostly disagree (2), I partially agree (3), I mostly agree (4), I totally agree (5)". The CTTS total score ranges from 49 to 245. It was stated that the students who scored high on the scale had a high tendency to think critically. (Semerci 2016).
5 weeks

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Problem Solving Inventory (PSI)
Tidsram: 5 weeks
The Problem Solving Inventory used in the research is one of the tools that measures the individual's own perception of problem solving skills. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the PSI scale was determined as 0.88. The Turkish adaptation of the scale developed by Heppner and Petersen in 1982 was carried out by Şahin, Şahin and Heppner (1993). A high total score from the scale indicates that individuals perceive themselves as inadequate in problem solving, while a low total score indicates that individuals perceive themselves as sufficient in problem solving skills
5 weeks

Andra resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Focus group semi-structured interview form -qualitative part
Tidsram: immediately after the intervention
Semi-structured focus group interview forms were used in the qualitative part of this study, which was conducted with a mixed research design. Focus group interview forms contain open-ended questions and allow new questions to be added when there is a need to deepen on a topic during the interview. Interview questions were prepared by the researcher as a result of the literature review. Afterwards, opinions were taken by two different experts, and necessary adjustments were made in the focus group interview form in line with these opinions. The final version of the interview form consists of six open-ended questions.
immediately after the intervention

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

Sakarya University

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Sakarya University, Sakarya University

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Allmänna publikationer

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

2 februari 2020

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

31 december 2021

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

21 februari 2022

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

29 juni 2022

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

7 juli 2022

Första postat (Faktisk)

13 juli 2022

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

13 juli 2022

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

7 juli 2022

Senast verifierad

1 juli 2022

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Nyckelord

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • 20/01/2020-E.889

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

NEJ

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera