此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

The Application of the Flipped Model in the Nursing Process and Evaluation of Its Reflection in the Clinic

2022年7月7日 更新者:nesibeyagmur、Sakarya University

Application of the Web Program Based on the Flipped Model in Nursıng Process Teaching and Evaluation of Its Reflect to the Clinic

Teaching the nursing process that nursing students will use throughout their professional career is very important. In this direction, considering the Z generation, innovative and technology-based teaching methods should be used. Since the subject of the nursing process is the building block of nursing, its teaching should also be effective. The use of innovative and technology-based education methods that will increase the active participation of the students in the teaching of the nursing process, reinforce the learning, and encourage them to use problem-solving and critical thinking skills has been very important in recent years. For this reason, this research was planned to examine the effect of flipped learning(FL) on students' problem solving and critical thinking skills and their views on this model in nursing process teaching. In this study, it will be carried out with mixed method. In the quantitative part of the research, pre-test-post-test, experimental design with randomized control group will be used, and in the qualitative part, case study and phenomenological design will be used.

研究概览

地位

完全的

详细说明

Ethics committee approval was obtained from the Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine.In this study, it will be carried out with mixed method.

In the quantitative part of this research, pre-test-post-test, experimental design with randomized control group will be used, and in the qualitative part, case study and phenomenological design will be applied. Considering the losses as a result of the G-power analysis, the sample of the research was planned to consist of 23 students in the intervention group and 23 students in the control group. A stratified randomization process will be carried out by applying the pre-test data to the students who meet the inclusion criteria of the study.

In this study, FL will be applied to the intervention group for 5 weeks, while the traditional method will be applied to the control group for 5 weeks.

In the quantitative dimension of the research, critical thinking disposition scale and problem solving inventory will be used. A semi-structured interview form will be used in the qualitative aspect of the research.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

46

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Serdivan
      • Sakarya、Serdivan、火鸡、54150
        • Nasibe Yağmur Ziyai

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 24年 (成人)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

Not having seen the subject of the nursing process before

  • Adequate internet access
  • Being willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not willing to participate in the study

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Experimental Group
FL will be applied to the intervention group. In this model, short videos of the course will be delivered to students via WhatsApp one week in advance. At the beginning of the lesson, students' deficiencies will be corrected by making kahoot. Afterwards, group work, case scenario, role-play scenario and conceptual map methods will be applied in the course.
FL was applied by Jonathan Bergmann and Aaron Sams in 2007 for high school students who had to be absent from chemistry class. Bergmann and Sams published all the learning activities they used during the lesson as videos. Bergmann and Sams (2012) stated that in this model, which they developed over time, it is not compulsory for the trainer to explain the entire course content in the videos, and the important thing is to allocate time to active learning methods during the course. In the FL model, the summary of the course content is presented to the individuals outside the classroom with tools such as video and power point presentations. In the lesson, activities are carried out for the active participation of the student. The student performs the course content outside of the classroom, and the homework and learning the course in the classroom.
无干预:Control Group
The subject of the nursing process will be transferred to the control group with powerpoint presentations by the educator. The activities in the other group will be presented by the trainer as an example.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CTTS)
大体时间:5 weeks
In this study, the "Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CTTS)" developed by Semerci (2016) was used. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the CTTS scale was determined as 0.96. This scale consists of 49 items scaled as "I totally disagree (1)", I mostly disagree (2), I partially agree (3), I mostly agree (4), I totally agree (5)". The CTTS total score ranges from 49 to 245. It was stated that the students who scored high on the scale had a high tendency to think critically. (Semerci 2016).
5 weeks

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Problem Solving Inventory (PSI)
大体时间:5 weeks
The Problem Solving Inventory used in the research is one of the tools that measures the individual's own perception of problem solving skills. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the PSI scale was determined as 0.88. The Turkish adaptation of the scale developed by Heppner and Petersen in 1982 was carried out by Şahin, Şahin and Heppner (1993). A high total score from the scale indicates that individuals perceive themselves as inadequate in problem solving, while a low total score indicates that individuals perceive themselves as sufficient in problem solving skills
5 weeks

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Focus group semi-structured interview form -qualitative part
大体时间:immediately after the intervention
Semi-structured focus group interview forms were used in the qualitative part of this study, which was conducted with a mixed research design. Focus group interview forms contain open-ended questions and allow new questions to be added when there is a need to deepen on a topic during the interview. Interview questions were prepared by the researcher as a result of the literature review. Afterwards, opinions were taken by two different experts, and necessary adjustments were made in the focus group interview form in line with these opinions. The final version of the interview form consists of six open-ended questions.
immediately after the intervention

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Sakarya University、Sakarya University

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2020年2月2日

初级完成 (实际的)

2021年12月31日

研究完成 (实际的)

2022年2月21日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2022年6月29日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2022年7月7日

首次发布 (实际的)

2022年7月13日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2022年7月13日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2022年7月7日

最后验证

2022年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 20/01/2020-E.889

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

护理龋齿的临床试验

Experimental的临床试验

3
订阅