Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

En studie för att lära sig om Zavegepant som akut behandling av migrän hos asiatiska vuxna

29 april 2026 uppdaterad av: Pfizer

En fas 3, randomiserad, dubbelblind, placebokontrollerad, parallell gruppstudie för att utvärdera effektiviteten och säkerheten hos Zavegepant Intranasal (IN) för akut behandling av migrän hos asiatiska vuxna

Syftet med denna studie är att lära sig hur säker och effektiv zavegepant är jämfört med placebo vid akut behandling av migrän hos asiatiska vuxna. Migrän är en mycket smärtsam huvudvärk med andra associerade symtom som illamående, fotofobi och fonofobi. En placebo är en ofarlig behandling som inte har någon medicinsk effekt.

Denna studie söker deltagare som:

  • ha minst 1 års migränhistoria innan du går in i studien.
  • ha 2 till 8 migränanfall av måttlig eller svår intensitet under var och en av de 3 månaderna innan studien påbörjades.
  • har mindre än 15 dagar med huvudvärk under var och en av de 3 månaderna innan du går in i studien. Huvudvärken kan antingen bero på migrän eller inte.

Deltagarna i denna studie kommer att få zavegepant eller placebo intranasalt. Intranasal betyder medicin som ges genom näsan. Zavegepant eller placebo kommer att tas om deltagarna har migränhuvudvärk av måttlig eller svår intensitet.

Studien kommer att jämföra upplevelserna hos personer som får zavegepant med upplevelserna hos personer som får placebo. Detta kommer att hjälpa till att se om zavegepant är säkert och effektivt för asiatiska vuxna.

Deltagarna kommer att vara med i denna studie i upp till cirka 16 veckor. Deltagarna kommer att ha 3 studiebesök på studiemottagningen och 1 genom telefonkontakt.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

1414

Fas

  • Fas 3

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

  • Kina
      • Beijing, Kina, 100044
        • Peking University People's Hospital
      • Beijing, Kina, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
      • Chongqing, Kina, 404000
        • Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital
      • Chongqing, Kina
        • The fourth people's hospital of chongqing
      • Shanghai, Kina, 200120
        • Shanghai East Hospital
      • Tianjin, Kina, 300000
        • Tianjin Union Medical Center
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, Kina, 230011
        • The Second People's Hospital of Hefei
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Kina, 100050
        • Beijing Friendship hospital, Capital Medical University
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Kina, 100853
        • The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
    • Chongqing Municipality
      • Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, Kina, 400016
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
    • Hainan
      • Haikou, Hainan, Kina, 570311
        • Hainan General Hospital
    • Hebei
      • Wuhan, Hebei, Kina, 430060
        • Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
    • Henan
      • Luoyang, Henan, Kina, 471003
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science &Technology
      • Luoyang, Henan, Kina, 471000
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science &Technology
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, Kina, 450000
        • People's Hospital of Zhengzhou
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, Kina, 430074
        • Wuhan Third Hospital
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, Kina, 410013
        • The Third XIANGYA Hospital of Central South University
      • Changsha, Hunan, Kina, 410004
        • Changsha Central Hospital
    • Jiangsu
      • Lianyungang, Jiangsu, Kina, 222006
        • The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, Kina, 210011
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, Kina, 215004
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
      • Wuxi, Jiangsu, Kina, 214023
        • Wuxi People's Hospital
      • Wuxi, Jiangsu, Kina, 214125
        • Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University
      • Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, Kina, 212008
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University
    • Jiangxi
      • Pingxiang, Jiangxi, Kina, 337055
        • Pingxiang People's Hospital
    • Jilin
      • Changchun, Jilin, Kina, 130000
        • The First Hospital of Jilin University
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, Kina, 110016
        • The People's Hospital of Liaoning Province
    • Ningxia
      • Yinchuan, Ningxia, Kina, 750001
        • The First People's Hospital of Yinchuan
      • Yinchuan, Ningxia, Kina, 750003
        • General Hospital of Ningxia Medical Hospital
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, Kina, 710061
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, Kina, 710068
        • Shaanxi Provincial People' Hospital
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, Kina, 710075
        • Xian Gaoxin Hospital
      • Xianyang, Shaanxi, Kina, 716099
        • Xianyang Hospital of Yan'an University
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, Kina, 250012
        • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
      • Jinan, Shandong, Kina, 250013
        • Jinan Central Hospital
      • Jining, Shandong, Kina, 272000
        • Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University
      • Liaocheng, Shandong, Kina, 252000
        • Liaocheng People's Hospital
      • Qingdao, Shandong, Kina, 266042
        • Qingdao Central Hospital
      • Rizhao, Shandong, Kina, 276800
        • People's Hospital of Rizhao
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina, 200040
        • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina, 200123
        • Shanghai East Hospital
    • Shanxi
      • Changzhi, Shanxi, Kina, 046000
        • Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, Kina, 650032
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Kina, 310016
        • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
      • Rui’an, Zhejiang, Kina, 325200
        • Ruian People's Hospital
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Kina, 325000
        • The First Affiliated Hosptial of Wenzhou Medical University
  • Sydkorea
      • Seoul, Sydkorea, 03181
        • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Sydkorea, 13620
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    • Kyǒnggi-do
      • Goyang-si, Kyǒnggi-do, Sydkorea, 10380
        • Inje University - Ilsan Paik Hospital
      • Hwaseong-si, Kyǒnggi-do, Sydkorea, 18450
        • Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital
      • Seongnam, Kyǒnggi-do, Sydkorea, 13620
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
      • Uijeongbu-si, Kyǒnggi-do, Sydkorea, 11765
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu ST. Mary's Hospital
    • Pusan-kwangyǒkshi
      • Busan, Pusan-kwangyǒkshi, Sydkorea, 49201
        • Dong-A University Hospital
    • Seoul-teukbyeolsi [seoul]
      • Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi [seoul], Sydkorea, 03080
        • Seoul National University Hospital
      • Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi [seoul], Sydkorea, 05505
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi [seoul], Sydkorea, 03722
        • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
      • Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi [seoul], Sydkorea, 01830
        • Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University
      • Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi [seoul], Sydkorea, 07804
        • Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital
  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11490
        • Tri-Service General Hospital
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
        • Chang Gung Medical Foundation-Linkou Branch

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

  • Vuxen
  • Äldre vuxen

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Beskrivning

Inklusionskriterier:

  • Asiatiska deltagare i åldern 18 år eller äldre vid screening.

  • Deltagare med minst 1 års historia av migrän (med eller utan aura) före screeningbesöket, i överensstämmelse med en diagnos enligt International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3:e upplagan, inklusive följande:

    1. Migränanfall förekommer i mer än 1 år med början före 50 års ålder.
    2. Migränanfall varar i genomsnitt cirka 4-72 timmar om de inte behandlas.
    3. Inte mer än 8 attacker av måttlig eller svår smärtintensitet per månad under de senaste 3 månaderna.
    4. Deltagarna måste kunna skilja migränattacker från spänningar/klusterhuvudvärk.
    5. Minst 2 konsekventa migränanfall av måttlig eller svår intensitet under var och en av de 3 månaderna före screeningbesöket och under screeningfasen (deltagares självrapportering).
    6. Mindre än 15 dagar med huvudvärk (migrän eller icke-migrän) per månad under var och en av de 3 månaderna före screeningbesöket och under hela screeningfasen (deltagares självrapportering).
    7. Deltagare på profylaktisk migränmedicin tillåts fortsätta att behandlas om de har haft en stabil dos i minst 3 månader före screeningbesöket och om dosen inte förväntas ändras till och med slutet av behandlingsbesöket.
    8. Deltagare med kontraindikationer för användning av triptaner kan inkluderas förutsatt att de uppfyller alla andra kriterier för studieinträde.

Exklusions kriterier:

  • Historik av retinal migrän, basilär migrän eller hemiplegisk migrän.
  • Historik eller aktuella tecken på okontrollerad, instabil eller nyligen diagnostiserad kardiovaskulär eller kardiometabolisk sjukdom.
  • Allvarlig depression, ångestsyndrom eller annan betydande psykiatrisk störning.
  • Akuta eller kroniska smärtsyndrom, psykiatriska tillstånd, demens eller betydande neurologiska störningar (andra än migrän) som stör studiebedömningar.
  • Tillstånd som kan påverka administreringen eller absorptionen av den nasala produkten.
  • Överanvändning av läkemedelshuvudvärk.

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Fyrdubbla

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Placebo-jämförare: Placebo
Läkemedel: Placebo
Engångsdos av matchande placebo tas inom behandlingsfasen.
Experimentell: Zavegepant
Zavegepant intranasal 10 mg
Läkemedel: Zavegepant
Deltagarna kommer att få aktiv engångsdos tillräcklig för att behandla 1 migränhuvudvärk av måttlig eller svår intensitet inom behandlingsfasen.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Percentage of Participants With Pain Freedom at 2 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: At 2 hours post-dose
Pain freedom was defined as pain intensity being none at the specified time point. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).
At 2 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) at 2 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: At 2 hours post-dose
MBS was selected from nausea, phonophobia or photophobia before dosing by the participants. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants who recorded an MBS (present) before dosing and did not have the MBS (absent) at the time of evaluation (i.e., 2 hours post-dose) were reported.
At 2 hours post-dose

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Percentage of Participants With Pain Relief at 15 Minutes Post-dose
Tidsram: At 15 minutes post-dose
Pain relief was defined as pain intensity being none or mild at the specified time point. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).
At 15 minutes post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Pain Relief at 30 Minutes Post-dose
Tidsram: At 30 minutes post-dose
Pain relief was defined as pain intensity being none or mild at the specified time point. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).
At 30 minutes post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Pain Relief at 2 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: At 2 hours post-dose
Pain relief was defined as pain intensity being none or mild at the specified time point. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).
At 2 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants Who Returned to Normal Function at 2 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: At 2 hours post-dose
Participants recorded their functional disability level using a 4-point numeric rating scale (0= normal, 1= mildly impaired, 2= severely impaired, 3= required bedrest). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants who had functional disability (mildly impaired, severely impaired, or required bedrest) at the time of dosing and then returned to normal function level at the time of evaluation (i.e., 2 hours post-dose) were reported.
At 2 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Pain Relief From 2 to 24 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: From 2 hours post-dose to 24 hours post-dose
Pain relief was defined as pain intensity being none or mild at the specified time point. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). This outcome of sustained pain relief was defined as pain intensity being mild or none at all time points from 2 to 24 hours post-dose with missing data <=1 time point from 3 to 8 hours post-dose.
From 2 hours post-dose to 24 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Pain Relief From 2 to 48 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: From 2 hours post-dose to 48 hours post-dose
Pain relief was defined as pain intensity being none or mild at the specified time point. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). This outcome of sustained pain relief was defined as pain intensity being mild or none at all time points from 2 to 48 hours post-dose with missing data <=1 time point from 3 to 8 hours post-dose.
From 2 hours post-dose to 48 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants Who Returned to Normal Function at 30 Minutes Post-dose
Tidsram: At 30 minutes post-dose
Participants recorded their functional disability level using a 4-point numeric rating scale (0= normal, 1= mildly impaired, 2= severely impaired, 3= required bedrest). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants who had functional disability (mildly impaired, severely impaired, or required bedrest) at the time of dosing and then returned to normal function level at the time of evaluation (i.e., 30 minutes post-dose) were reported.
At 30 minutes post-dose
Percentage of Participants Who Returned to Normal Function at 60 Minutes Post-dose
Tidsram: At 60 minutes post-dose
Participants recorded their functional disability level using a 4-point numeric rating scale (0= normal, 1= mildly impaired, 2= severely impaired, 3= required bedrest). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants who had functional disability (mildly impaired, severely impaired, or required bedrest) at the time of dosing and then returned to normal function level at the time of evaluation (i.e., 60 minutes post-dose) were reported.
At 60 minutes post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Phonophobia at 2 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: At 2 hours post-dose
Freedom from phonophobia was defined as phonophobia absent at specified time point for participants with the phonophobia present at the time of dosing. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants who had phonophobia at the time of dosing and then recorded phonophobia absent at the time of evaluation (i.e., 2 hours post-dose) were reported.
At 2 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Photophobia at 2 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: At 2 hours post-dose
Freedom from photophobia was defined as photophobia absent at specified time point for participants with the photophobia present at the time of dosing. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants who had photophobia at the time of dosing and then recorded photophobia absent at the time of evaluation (i.e., 2 hours post-dose) were reported.
At 2 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Nausea at 2 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: At 2 hours post-dose
Freedom from nausea was defined as nausea absent at specified time point for participants with the nausea present at the time of dosing. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants who had nausea at the time of dosing and then recorded nausea absent at time of evaluation (i.e., 2 hours post-dose) were reported.
At 2 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Pain Freedom From 2 to 24 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: From 2 hours post-dose to 24 hours post-dose
Pain freedom was defined as pain intensity being none at the specified time point. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). Sustained pain freedom was defined as pain intensity being none at all time points from 2 to 24 hours post-dose with missing data <=1 time point from 3 to 8 hours post-dose.
From 2 hours post-dose to 24 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Pain Freedom From 2 to 48 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: From 2 hours post-dose to 48 hours post-dose
Pain freedom was defined as pain intensity being none at the specified time point. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). Sustained pain freedom was defined as pain intensity being none at all time points from 2 to 48 hours post-dose with missing data <=1 time point from 3 to 8 hours post-dose.
From 2 hours post-dose to 48 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Pain Relapse at Any Time Point After 2 Hours Post-dose to 48 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: From after 2 hours post-dose to 48 hours post-dose
Pain relapse was defined as pain intensity of mild, moderate, or severe at any time point after 2 hours to 48 hours post-dose for participants with pain intensity of none at 2 hours post-dose. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).
From after 2 hours post-dose to 48 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants Taking Rescue Medication Within 24 Hours Post-dose
Tidsram: Within 24 hours post-dose
Participants who did not experience relief (pain intensity of none or mild) of their migraine headache at the end of 2 hours post-dose, or the migraine was relieved at 2 hours post-dose, but then recurred to a moderate or severe pain intensity level, were permitted to use the following rescue medications: aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen (or any other type of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug), acetaminophen up to 1000 mg/day (this included Excedrin Migraine), antiemetics (for example, metoclopramide or promethazine), or baclofen.
Within 24 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With Pain Relief at 60 Minutes Post-dose
Tidsram: At 60 minutes post-dose
Pain relief was defined as pain intensity being none or mild at the specified time point. Participants recorded their headache pain intensity using 4-point numeric rating scale (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).
At 60 minutes post-dose
Percentage of Participants Who Returned to Normal Function at 15 Minutes Post-dose
Tidsram: At 15 minutes post-dose
Participants recorded their functional disability level using a 4-point numeric rating scale (0= normal, 1= mildly impaired, 2= severely impaired, 3= required bedrest). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants who had functional disability (mildly impaired, severely impaired, or required bedrest) at the time of dosing and then returned to normal function level at the time of evaluation (i.e., 15 minutes post-dose) were reported.
At 15 minutes post-dose
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) of Moderate or Severe Intensity: On-Treatment Period
Tidsram: On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Moderate AE: A type of AE that was usually alleviated with additional specific therapeutic intervention. The event interfered with usual activity/activities of daily living (ADL), causing discomfort, but posed no significant or permanent risk of harm to the research participant. Severe AE: A type of AE that interrupted usual ADL, or significantly affected clinical status, or might have required intensive therapeutic intervention.
On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days
Number of Participants With AEs of Moderate or Severe Intensity: Follow-up Period
Tidsram: Follow-up period: Follow-up period was after the EOT visit and through the follow-up visit, up to 33 days
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Moderate AE: A type of AE that was usually alleviated with additional specific therapeutic intervention. The event interfered with usual ADL, causing discomfort, but posed no significant or permanent risk of harm to the research participant. Severe AE: A type of AE that interrupted usual ADL, or significantly affected clinical status, or might have required intensive therapeutic intervention.
Follow-up period: Follow-up period was after the EOT visit and through the follow-up visit, up to 33 days
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): On-Treatment Period
Tidsram: On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or nonpathogenic, or other situations.
On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days
Number of Participants With SAEs: Follow-up Period
Tidsram: Follow-up period: Follow-up period was after the EOT visit and through the follow-up visit, up to 33 days
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or nonpathogenic, or other situations.
Follow-up period: Follow-up period was after the EOT visit and through the follow-up visit, up to 33 days
Number of Participants With Local Irritation AEs: On-Treatment Period
Tidsram: On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Local irritation AEs were associated with intranasal administration of study intervention (e.g., dysgeusia, nasal discomfort, oropharyngeal pain, throat irritation, and laryngeal discomfort).
On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days
Number of Participants With Local Irritation AEs: Follow-up Period
Tidsram: Follow-up period: Follow-up period was after the EOT visit and through the follow-up visit, up to 33 days
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Local irritation AEs were associated with intranasal administration of study intervention (e.g., dysgeusia, nasal discomfort, oropharyngeal pain, throat irritation, and laryngeal discomfort).
Follow-up period: Follow-up period was after the EOT visit and through the follow-up visit, up to 33 days
Number of Participants With Grade 3 to 4 Hematological Test Abnormalities: On-Treatment Period
Tidsram: On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days
Hematological test abnormalities included: anemia, eosinophilia, hemoglobin increased, leukocytosis, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophils count decreased, platelet count decreased and white blood cell decreased. Only those hematology test categories in which at least one participant in at least one reporting arm experienced a Grade 3 or Grade 4 abnormality were reported in this outcome measure. The hematological test abnormalities grade 3 to 4 were graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0.
On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days
Number of Participants With Grade 3 to 4 Clinical Chemistry Test Abnormalities: On-Treatment Period
Tidsram: On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days
Clinical chemistry test abnormalities included: alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, blood lactate dehydrogenase increased, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increased, chronic kidney disease, creatinine increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia and hyponatremia. Only those clinical chemistry test categories in which at least one participant in at least one reporting arm experienced a Grade 3 or Grade 4 abnormality were reported in this outcome measure. The clinical chemistry test abnormalities grade 3 to 4 were graded according to the CTCAE v 5.0.
On-treatment period: On-treatment period was from the administration of study intervention and through the EOT visit, up to 10 days

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

Pfizer

Utredare

  • Studierektor: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Användbara länkar

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

29 november 2023

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

30 maj 2025

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

30 maj 2025

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

3 augusti 2023

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

3 augusti 2023

Första postat (Faktisk)

14 augusti 2023

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

22 maj 2026

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

29 april 2026

Senast verifierad

1 april 2026

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • C5301008
  • NCT05989048 (Registeridentifierare: ClinicalTrials.gov)

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivning

Pfizer kommer att ge tillgång till individuella avidentifierade deltagardata och relaterade studiedokument (t.ex. protokoll, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) på begäran från kvalificerade forskare, och med förbehåll för vissa kriterier, villkor och undantag. Ytterligare information om Pfizers kriterier för datadelning och process för att begära åtkomst finns på: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Ja

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

produkt tillverkad i och exporterad från U.S.A.

Ja

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera