Quantifying the Influence of Expert Modeling
2019年4月30日 更新者：Ashley Franklin、Oregon Health and Science University
Quantifying the Influence of Expert Modeling on Novice Nurse Competence and Self-Efficacy
The purpose of this study is to learn more about the effects of various types of simulation preparation methods on novice nurses' competence and self-efficacy.
Participants will be recruited from an academic course (N424 Integrated Practicum).
Participants will be randomized to three intervention groups (i.e.
expert modeling video, voice over PowerPoint, and traditional readings).
All participants will complete self-efficacy surveys and two simulations.
During simulation, participants will be scored based on their competence according to a performance rubric.
The hypothesis is that participants in the expert modeling group will demonstrate more change in competence and report more change in self-efficacy scores than participants in other groups.
研究概览
地位
完全的
详细说明
Investigators will compare self-confidence and competence scores between the three groups after the pre-test and posttest simulations.
The self-efficacy survey is an 7-item scale that involves participants rating their self-efficacy about providing care for multiple patients.
Participants rate their self-efficacy on a 1 to 5 (not confident to very confident scale).
The survey takes 5 minutes to complete.
The self-efficacy survey has been used in many simulation research studies previously with novice nurses.
Competence will be measured with a rater-observation measure which has previously been used in simulation research.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
20
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Oregon
-
Ashland、Oregon、美国、97520
- Oregon Health & Science University, School of Nursing
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 至 60年 (成人)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Enrolled in capstone clinical course
- Oregon Consortium for Nursing Education curriculum
- Ashland, OR
Exclusion Criteria:
- No exclusion criteria
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：三倍
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Expert Modeling
Participants will have access to 70 minutes of expert modeling videos available over 5 weeks on an online learning management system.
The investigator will be the expert model in the videos.
Expert modeling videos will address content related to seven concepts: Taking report with a graphic organizer worksheet, prioritizing patient care, delegating to unlicensed assistive personnel, safety checks in patient rooms, focused physical assessments, safe medication administration, and using a standardized healthcare provider communication tool on the telephone.
|
Participants in all groups have common readings related to policies for nursing care in acute care facilities.
There will be additional handouts related to performing safety checks and a focused physical assessment.
70 minutes of expert modeling videos
|
|
有源比较器：Voice Over PowerPoint
Participants will have access to 60 minutes of voice over PowerPoint slides, available over 5 weeks on an online learning management system, specifically to match exposure and content with the expert modeling video group.
The script for PowerPoint will contain content related to the aforementioned seven concepts.
There will be static photos, but no expert modeling videos, on PowerPoint slides.
The investigator will narrate the voice over PowerPoint.
|
Participants in all groups have common readings related to policies for nursing care in acute care facilities.
There will be additional handouts related to performing safety checks and a focused physical assessment.
60 minutes of Voice Over PowerPoint presentations
|
|
安慰剂比较：Reading
Participants will have access to articles, policies, and procedures on an online learning management system.
The estimated time required for participants to review these materials is 45 minutes
|
Participants in all groups have common readings related to policies for nursing care in acute care facilities.
There will be additional handouts related to performing safety checks and a focused physical assessment.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument
大体时间：Change from baseline on Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument at 5 weeks
|
Change from baseline on Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument at 5 weeks
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
National League for Nursing Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Learning scale
大体时间：Change from baseline on NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Learning scale at 5 weeks
|
Change from baseline on NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Learning scale at 5 weeks
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Ashley Franklin、Oregon Health and Science University
- 学习椅：Christopher S Lee, PhD、Oregon Health and Science University
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始
2013年11月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2014年6月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2014年6月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2014年3月24日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2014年3月26日
首次发布 (估计)
2014年3月31日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2019年5月2日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2019年4月30日
最后验证
2019年4月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他研究编号
- MPtSim-Ashland
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.