Motivational Interview Intervention to Help Patients Formulate Their Goals for Medical Care in the Emergency Department
2022年1月11日 更新者：Kei Ouchi、Brigham and Women's Hospital
A Pilot Study to Test the Acceptability and Feasibility of Brief Motivational Interview Intervention to Help Patients Formulate Their Goals for Medical Care in the Emergency Department
Test the acceptability and feasibility of a brief motivational interview intervention to facilitate advance care planning (ACP) conversations for older adults with serious co-morbid illness being discharged from the emergency department (ED).
The investigators will interview the participants to understand their perception of the intervention and collect patient-reported outcomes data after leaving the ED.
研究概览
详细说明
This study is designed to engage seriously ill older adults in conversations about their goals of care.
Our intervention is intended to help these patients understand the significance of ED visits in the course of their illnesses.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
75
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02115
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
65年 及以上 (年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥65 years of age
- English-speaking
- Capacity to consent
- AND ≥1 Serious illness (New York Heart Association stage 3 or 4 heart failure, oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive lung disease, chronic kidney disease on dialysis, and metastatic cancer.) OR determined by the emergency department provider that the patient has a high likelihood of death in the next 12 months ("I would not be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months.").
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute physical or emotional distress
- Determined by emergency department provider not to be appropriate
- Clearly documented goals for medical care already exists (e.g. medical order for life sustaining treatment - MOLST).
- Already enrolled in this study
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：卫生服务研究
- 分配：不适用
- 介入模型：单组作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Intervention Arm
This is a single arm study with all enrolled patients receiving the same brief motivational interview intervention.
|
A brief (<7minutes) interview by an emergency department clinician to empower patients to formulate and communicate their goals for medical care with patients' outpatient clinicians.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Who Found the Intervention Acceptable and Provided Suggestions for Improvement
大体时间：Immediately following the intervention in the emergency department.
|
The investigator will measure quantitatively and qualitatively whether patients found this intervention acceptable and provided suggestions for its improvement.
|
Immediately following the intervention in the emergency department.
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of the Intervention by Administering Clinicians.
大体时间：Immediately following the intervention in the emergency department.
|
The investigators will ask the emergency department clinicians who administered the intervention to report the intervention acceptability using a Likert scale survey.
|
Immediately following the intervention in the emergency department.
|
|
Patient's Quality of Life
大体时间：At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
|
The investigators will measure patient's quality of life using a validated survey measure (Quality of life at the end of life, QUAL-E, Steinhauser et al. 2004) at baseline and after the intervention.
QUAL-E consists of 25-items and measures 4 domains (symptom impact, relationship with the healthcare provider, preparation for the end of life, and life completion).
Each item is in a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (1 Not at all to 5 Completely), and lower scores indicate better outcomes for all domains except for the preparation for the end of life domain and life completion domain where higher scores indicate better outcomes.
The mean composite score is compared between baseline and 1 month after the intervention.
|
At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
|
|
Advance Care Planning Engagement Behavior
大体时间：At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
|
The investigators will measure patient's behaviors and actions for completing advance care planning using a validated survey measure (advance care planning engagement survey, Sudore et al 2017) at baseline and after the intervention.
The measure is a 4-item survey measuring actions and behaviors of advance care planning.
The additive composite score is calculated and ranges from 1 (least engagement) to 5 (most engagement).
|
At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
|
|
Patient Empowerment
大体时间：At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
|
The investigators will measure patient empowerment by using a validated survey measure (Patient Activation Measure, PAM™) at baseline and after the intervention.
|
At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
|
|
Patient Distress
大体时间：Within 7 days after the intervention.
|
The investigators will measure patient anxiety/distress regarding a particular event (in this case, our intervention) by using a validated survey measure (Impact of Event Scale - Revised, IES-R, Weiss 1996) within a week after the intervention. IES-R is a 22-item, 5-point Likert scale measure (ranging from 0 Not at all to 4 Extremely). Results consist of the mean rating for the total score and raw scores for three subscales: The Avoidance Scale, Intrusion Scale, and the Hyperarousal Scale. The scores give an indication of the level of impairment from post traumatic stress, where: 0 = No symptoms 1 = Few symptoms 2 = Moderate symptoms 3 = A High level of symptoms 4 = An Extremely high level of symptoms |
Within 7 days after the intervention.
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Kei Ouchi, MD, MPH、Brigham and Women's Hospital
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2017年8月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2019年5月31日
研究完成 (实际的)
2019年5月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2017年7月3日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2017年7月3日
首次发布 (实际的)
2017年7月5日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2022年1月13日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2022年1月11日
最后验证
2022年1月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.