Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Motivational Interview Intervention to Help Patients Formulate Their Goals for Medical Care in the Emergency Department

11. januar 2022 opdateret af: Kei Ouchi, Brigham and Women's Hospital

A Pilot Study to Test the Acceptability and Feasibility of Brief Motivational Interview Intervention to Help Patients Formulate Their Goals for Medical Care in the Emergency Department

Test the acceptability and feasibility of a brief motivational interview intervention to facilitate advance care planning (ACP) conversations for older adults with serious co-morbid illness being discharged from the emergency department (ED). The investigators will interview the participants to understand their perception of the intervention and collect patient-reported outcomes data after leaving the ED.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

This study is designed to engage seriously ill older adults in conversations about their goals of care. Our intervention is intended to help these patients understand the significance of ED visits in the course of their illnesses.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

75

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

65 år og ældre (Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥65 years of age
  • English-speaking
  • Capacity to consent
  • AND ≥1 Serious illness (New York Heart Association stage 3 or 4 heart failure, oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive lung disease, chronic kidney disease on dialysis, and metastatic cancer.) OR determined by the emergency department provider that the patient has a high likelihood of death in the next 12 months ("I would not be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months.").

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute physical or emotional distress
  • Determined by emergency department provider not to be appropriate
  • Clearly documented goals for medical care already exists (e.g. medical order for life sustaining treatment - MOLST).
  • Already enrolled in this study

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Intervention Arm
This is a single arm study with all enrolled patients receiving the same brief motivational interview intervention.
A brief (<7minutes) interview by an emergency department clinician to empower patients to formulate and communicate their goals for medical care with patients' outpatient clinicians.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Number of Patients Who Found the Intervention Acceptable and Provided Suggestions for Improvement
Tidsramme: Immediately following the intervention in the emergency department.
The investigator will measure quantitatively and qualitatively whether patients found this intervention acceptable and provided suggestions for its improvement.
Immediately following the intervention in the emergency department.

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Acceptability of the Intervention by Administering Clinicians.
Tidsramme: Immediately following the intervention in the emergency department.
The investigators will ask the emergency department clinicians who administered the intervention to report the intervention acceptability using a Likert scale survey.
Immediately following the intervention in the emergency department.
Patient's Quality of Life
Tidsramme: At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
The investigators will measure patient's quality of life using a validated survey measure (Quality of life at the end of life, QUAL-E, Steinhauser et al. 2004) at baseline and after the intervention. QUAL-E consists of 25-items and measures 4 domains (symptom impact, relationship with the healthcare provider, preparation for the end of life, and life completion). Each item is in a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (1 Not at all to 5 Completely), and lower scores indicate better outcomes for all domains except for the preparation for the end of life domain and life completion domain where higher scores indicate better outcomes. The mean composite score is compared between baseline and 1 month after the intervention.
At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
Advance Care Planning Engagement Behavior
Tidsramme: At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
The investigators will measure patient's behaviors and actions for completing advance care planning using a validated survey measure (advance care planning engagement survey, Sudore et al 2017) at baseline and after the intervention. The measure is a 4-item survey measuring actions and behaviors of advance care planning. The additive composite score is calculated and ranges from 1 (least engagement) to 5 (most engagement).
At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
Patient Empowerment
Tidsramme: At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
The investigators will measure patient empowerment by using a validated survey measure (Patient Activation Measure, PAM™) at baseline and after the intervention.
At baseline (in-person) and 1 month after (over the phone) the intervention.
Patient Distress
Tidsramme: Within 7 days after the intervention.

The investigators will measure patient anxiety/distress regarding a particular event (in this case, our intervention) by using a validated survey measure (Impact of Event Scale - Revised, IES-R, Weiss 1996) within a week after the intervention. IES-R is a 22-item, 5-point Likert scale measure (ranging from 0 Not at all to 4 Extremely).

Results consist of the mean rating for the total score and raw scores for three subscales:

The Avoidance Scale, Intrusion Scale, and the Hyperarousal Scale.

The scores give an indication of the level of impairment from post traumatic stress, where: 0 = No symptoms 1 = Few symptoms 2 = Moderate symptoms 3 = A High level of symptoms 4 = An Extremely high level of symptoms

Within 7 days after the intervention.

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Kei Ouchi, MD, MPH, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. august 2017

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

31. maj 2019

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

31. maj 2019

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

3. juli 2017

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

3. juli 2017

Først opslået (Faktiske)

5. juli 2017

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

13. januar 2022

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

11. januar 2022

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2022

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 2016P002637

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Motiverende samtale

Kliniske forsøg med Brief motivational interview intervention

Abonner