此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Staff Experiences in Robotic Theatres

2021年4月29日 更新者:University of Leicester

A Qualitative Study of Staff Experiences and Practices Within the Robotic Theatre Setup

Studies have shown that team work impacts patients safety. This is particularly the case in surgical theatres where individuals from different backgrounds (surgeon, anaesthetists, nurses, ..etc) work together to achieve a common goal which is looking after the patient. The robotic theatre set up is different due to the physical separation of the surgeon from the patient and the rest of the team. This may represent a communication challenge. The Study investigators aim to study theatre staff experiences and practices of communication and teamwork in this special setup, investigating any challenges participants may be facing and possible ways of adapting to them. Staff opinions and suggestions for improvement will be explored for utmost surgical performance and patient safety.

The study will involve two parts:1) individual staff interviews and 2) teamwork observations during real life surgery. The two parts should complement each other giving an overall picture of the teamwork in the robotic theatre setup.

研究概览

地位

完全的

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

54

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Leicester、英国
        • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Participants will be theatre staff, from any surgical discipline, who are involved in robotic surgery practice at University Hospitals of Leicester and Cambridge University Hospital. This includes, but not limited to surgeons (primary and assistants), nurses (scrub, circulating, or student), anaesthetists (including trainees) and operating department practitioners (ODP).

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Robotic theatre staff as above.
  2. Willing and able to participate.
  3. Good command of the English language.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Theatre staff not involved in robotic surgery.
  2. Participants not willing / unable to participate.
  3. Staff that have not worked in a conventional theatre setup before.
  4. Inability to read/speak/understand English.
  5. Lack of capacity for consent.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Robotic procedures
Experiences and practices in Robotic theatres will be studied via semi-structured interviews with staff as well as team observations during real time robotic surgery. As the study is a qualitative one, data collection will continue till we reach saturation of theoretical categories. We expect 20 interviews and 10 observations to suffice.
This is a qualitative study involving staff interviews and observations. No intervention is being applied.
Non-Robotic procedures

Staff involved in robotic surgery will have almost definitely worked in non-robotic theatres ie major abdominal and laparoscopic. Staff interviews will explore differences in experiences and practices between these different theatre setups.

In addition, we aim to observe further 5 non-robotic procedures to evaluate staff teamwork and communication within the more regular theatre setup.

This is a qualitative study involving staff interviews and observations. No intervention is being applied.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Robotic staff experiences.
大体时间:1 year
This will be explored using individual interviews and team observations. Textual data of interview transcripts and observation field notes will be analysed using constant comparative method.
1 year
Robotic staff practices
大体时间:1 year
This will be explored using individual interviews and team observations. Textual data of interview transcripts and observation field notes will be analysed using constant comparative method.
1 year

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Staff communication in robotic theatres.
大体时间:1 year
This will be explored using individual interviews and team observations. Textual data of interview transcripts and observation field notes will be analysed using constant comparative method.
1 year
Staff teamwork
大体时间:1 year
This will be explored using individual interviews and team observations. Textual data of interview transcripts and observation field notes will be analysed using constant comparative method.
1 year

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2018年7月8日

初级完成 (实际的)

2019年3月21日

研究完成 (实际的)

2019年3月21日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2018年2月19日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2018年2月26日

首次发布 (实际的)

2018年3月5日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2021年5月3日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2021年4月29日

最后验证

2021年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 0647
  • 237227 (其他标识符:Integrated Research Application System (IRAS))

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

No intervention的临床试验

订阅