Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine
Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade: Pons and Cons
研究概览
详细说明
There are multiple controversies among the previous studies for the use of different opioids as adjuvants for brachial plexus blockade to improve various block characteristics. Moreover, limited studies estimate the pons and cons of tramadol versus fentanyl as co-administrator to bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade.
In our study, we aim to assess the utility of fentanyl versus tramadol as co-administrator to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade in upper limb surgeries in a prospective randomized controlled fashion. The primary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on the onset and duration of sensory and motor block and the secondary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on postoperative analgesia, time of the request to rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesic consumption, and complications.
The patients were aged between 18 and 60, both gender, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. However, patients who had bleeding disorders got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery, had a history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases, local infections at the site where needle for the block is to be inserted, pregnant woman and in whom the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia were excluded from the study.
Patients were randomly allocated into three groups for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Randomization was established using the computer-generated closed envelopes method.
Group B (bupivacaine group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml normal saline Group F (fentanyl group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (1µg/kg-2 ml) Group T (tramadol group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (1mg/kg-2 ml)
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Aswan、埃及、81511
- Aswan university hospital
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. scheduled for forearm or hand surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- bleeding disorders
- patients who got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery,
- history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases
- local infections at the site where the needle for the block is to be inserted
- a pregnant woman
- the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：三倍
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器：Group B (bupivacaine group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus normal saline (2ml)
|
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side.
In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view.
After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe.
Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
|
|
有源比较器：Group F (fentanyl group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (100µg-2 ml)
|
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side.
In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view.
After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe.
Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
|
|
有源比较器：Group T (tramadol group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (100mg-2 ml)
|
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side.
In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view.
After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe.
Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
感觉阻滞持续时间（小时）
大体时间：24小时
|
是从感觉阻滞开始到手术部位感觉恢复的时间
|
24小时
|
|
运动阻滞持续时间（以小时为单位）
大体时间：24小时
|
这是从运动阻滞开始到恢复手部和腕部整体活动能力的时间。
|
24小时
|
|
Onset time of sensory block in minutes
大体时间：40 minutes
|
After the injection of the solution, every patient was checked for the onset of sensory blockade using goose soaked with iced normal saline by the following scale (three-point scale): Grade 0= perceived as normal sensation, Grade 1 = loss of cold sensation (analgesia), Grade 2= loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).
|
40 minutes
|
|
onset time of motor blockade in minutes using the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale)
大体时间：40 minutes
|
the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale): Grade 0: Normal motor function, Grade 1: Decreased motor strength with the ability to move the fingers only, Grade 2: Complete motor block with an inability to move the fingers.
|
40 minutes
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
术后首次镇痛请求时间（小时）
大体时间：24小时
|
从完全感觉阻滞到 VAS > 4 cm 时要求抢救镇痛。
|
24小时
|
|
平均血压（mmHg）
大体时间：24小时
|
在阻滞前（0 分钟）和阻滞后 5、10、15、30 分钟以及阻滞后 1、2、3、6、12、18 和 24 小时测量
|
24小时
|
|
心跳率/分钟
大体时间：24小时
|
在阻滞前（0 分钟）和阻滞后 5、10、15、30 分钟以及 1、2、3、6、12、18 和 24 小时测量。
|
24小时
|
|
外周血氧饱和度
大体时间：24小时
|
在阻滞前（0 分钟）和阻滞后 5、10、15、30 分钟以及 1、2、3、6、12、18 和 24 小时测量。
|
24小时
|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS): the VAS consisted of a straight, vertical 10-cm line; the bottom point represented "no pain" = (0 cm) and the top "the worst pain you ever have" = (10 cm).
大体时间：24 hours
|
Patients were asked to rate their pain intensity at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after the block
|
24 hours
|
|
Rescue analgesia in the form of 0.05 mg/kg morphine sulfate intravenously
大体时间：24 hours
|
was given when VAS ≥ 4 cm
|
24 hours
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员：huda fahmy, ph D、Aswan University
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
在美国制造并从美国出口的产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.