Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine
12. desember 2020 oppdatert av: huda fahmy, Aswan University Hospital
Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade: Pons and Cons
Supraclavicular brachial plexus approach is an alternative technique to general anesthesia resulting in a fast onset of a reliable blockage of the brachial plexus.
The use of ultrasound for the performance of supraclavicular block has become the gold standard since it enables the clinician to deposit the local anesthetic close to the nerves in real-time that improves the success rate with a safety margin.
Adjuvants are added to local anesthetic in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade to improve the quality of nerve blocks and the duration of analgesia.
It should be noted that no adjuvant has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prolongation of peripheral nerve blocks
Studieoversikt
Status
Fullført
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
There are multiple controversies among the previous studies for the use of different opioids as adjuvants for brachial plexus blockade to improve various block characteristics. Moreover, limited studies estimate the pons and cons of tramadol versus fentanyl as co-administrator to bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade.
In our study, we aim to assess the utility of fentanyl versus tramadol as co-administrator to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade in upper limb surgeries in a prospective randomized controlled fashion. The primary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on the onset and duration of sensory and motor block and the secondary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on postoperative analgesia, time of the request to rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesic consumption, and complications.
The patients were aged between 18 and 60, both gender, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. However, patients who had bleeding disorders got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery, had a history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases, local infections at the site where needle for the block is to be inserted, pregnant woman and in whom the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia were excluded from the study.
Patients were randomly allocated into three groups for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Randomization was established using the computer-generated closed envelopes method.
Group B (bupivacaine group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml normal saline Group F (fentanyl group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (1µg/kg-2 ml) Group T (tramadol group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (1mg/kg-2 ml)
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Faktiske)
66
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Aswan, Egypt, 81511
- Aswan university hospital
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
18 år til 60 år (Voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. scheduled for forearm or hand surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- bleeding disorders
- patients who got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery,
- history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases
- local infections at the site where the needle for the block is to be inserted
- a pregnant woman
- the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Trippel
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Aktiv komparator: Group B (bupivacaine group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus normal saline (2ml)
|
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side.
In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view.
After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe.
Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Group F (fentanyl group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (100µg-2 ml)
|
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side.
In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view.
After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe.
Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Group T (tramadol group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (100mg-2 ml)
|
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side.
In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view.
After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe.
Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Varighet av sensorisk blokkering i timer
Tidsramme: 24 timer
|
Det er tiden fra sensorisk blokkering begynner til tidspunktet for gjenoppretting av følelsen på operasjonsstedet
|
24 timer
|
|
Varighet av motorblokk i timer
Tidsramme: 24 timer
|
Det er tiden fra motorblokken begynner til gjenoppretting av global mobilitet i hånden og håndleddet.
|
24 timer
|
|
Onset time of sensory block in minutes
Tidsramme: 40 minutes
|
After the injection of the solution, every patient was checked for the onset of sensory blockade using goose soaked with iced normal saline by the following scale (three-point scale): Grade 0= perceived as normal sensation, Grade 1 = loss of cold sensation (analgesia), Grade 2= loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).
|
40 minutes
|
|
onset time of motor blockade in minutes using the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale)
Tidsramme: 40 minutes
|
the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale): Grade 0: Normal motor function, Grade 1: Decreased motor strength with the ability to move the fingers only, Grade 2: Complete motor block with an inability to move the fingers.
|
40 minutes
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperativ første analgetikaforespørselstid i timer
Tidsramme: 24 timer
|
ble tatt fra tidspunktet for fullstendig sensorisk blokkering til forespørselen om å redde analgesi når VAS > 4 cm.
|
24 timer
|
|
Gjennomsnittlig blodtrykk i mmHg
Tidsramme: 24 timer
|
ble målt før blokkeringen (0 min) og 5, 10, 15, 30 minutter, deretter 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 og 24 timer etter blokkeringen
|
24 timer
|
|
hjertefrekvens i slag/minutt
Tidsramme: 24 timer
|
ble målt før blokkeringen (0 min) og 5, 10, 15, 30 min, deretter 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 og 24 timer etter blokkeringen.
|
24 timer
|
|
perifer oksygenmetning
Tidsramme: 24 timer
|
ble målt før blokkeringen (0 min) og 5, 10, 15, 30 min, deretter 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 og 24 timer etter blokkeringen.
|
24 timer
|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS): the VAS consisted of a straight, vertical 10-cm line; the bottom point represented "no pain" = (0 cm) and the top "the worst pain you ever have" = (10 cm).
Tidsramme: 24 hours
|
Patients were asked to rate their pain intensity at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after the block
|
24 hours
|
|
Rescue analgesia in the form of 0.05 mg/kg morphine sulfate intravenously
Tidsramme: 24 hours
|
was given when VAS ≥ 4 cm
|
24 hours
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: huda fahmy, ph D, Aswan University
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
15. februar 2019
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
31. august 2020
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
30. september 2020
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
1. desember 2020
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
7. desember 2020
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
14. desember 2020
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
16. desember 2020
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
12. desember 2020
Sist bekreftet
1. desember 2020
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 337/2/19
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
produkt produsert i og eksportert fra USA
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .