Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine

12. december 2020 opdateret af: huda fahmy, Aswan University Hospital

Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade: Pons and Cons

Supraclavicular brachial plexus approach is an alternative technique to general anesthesia resulting in a fast onset of a reliable blockage of the brachial plexus. The use of ultrasound for the performance of supraclavicular block has become the gold standard since it enables the clinician to deposit the local anesthetic close to the nerves in real-time that improves the success rate with a safety margin. Adjuvants are added to local anesthetic in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade to improve the quality of nerve blocks and the duration of analgesia. It should be noted that no adjuvant has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prolongation of peripheral nerve blocks

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

There are multiple controversies among the previous studies for the use of different opioids as adjuvants for brachial plexus blockade to improve various block characteristics. Moreover, limited studies estimate the pons and cons of tramadol versus fentanyl as co-administrator to bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade.

In our study, we aim to assess the utility of fentanyl versus tramadol as co-administrator to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade in upper limb surgeries in a prospective randomized controlled fashion. The primary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on the onset and duration of sensory and motor block and the secondary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on postoperative analgesia, time of the request to rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesic consumption, and complications.

The patients were aged between 18 and 60, both gender, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. However, patients who had bleeding disorders got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery, had a history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases, local infections at the site where needle for the block is to be inserted, pregnant woman and in whom the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia were excluded from the study.

Patients were randomly allocated into three groups for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Randomization was established using the computer-generated closed envelopes method.

Group B (bupivacaine group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml normal saline Group F (fentanyl group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (1µg/kg-2 ml) Group T (tramadol group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (1mg/kg-2 ml)

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

66

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Aswan, Egypten, 81511
        • Aswan University Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 60 år (Voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. scheduled for forearm or hand surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bleeding disorders
  • patients who got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery,
  • history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases
  • local infections at the site where the needle for the block is to be inserted
  • a pregnant woman
  • the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Tredobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Group B (bupivacaine group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus normal saline (2ml)
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe. The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side. In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view. After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe. Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
Aktiv komparator: Group F (fentanyl group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (100µg-2 ml)
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe. The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side. In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view. After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe. Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.
Aktiv komparator: Group T (tramadol group)
patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (100mg-2 ml)
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe. The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side. In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view. After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe. Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Varighed af sensorisk blokering i timer
Tidsramme: 24 timer
Det er tiden fra sensorisk blokering begynder til tidspunktet for genoprettelse af følelsen på operationsstedet
24 timer
Varighed af motorblokering i timer
Tidsramme: 24 timer
Det er tiden fra motorisk blokering begynder til genoprettelsen af ​​global mobilitet i hånden og håndleddet.
24 timer
Onset time of sensory block in minutes
Tidsramme: 40 minutes
After the injection of the solution, every patient was checked for the onset of sensory blockade using goose soaked with iced normal saline by the following scale (three-point scale): Grade 0= perceived as normal sensation, Grade 1 = loss of cold sensation (analgesia), Grade 2= loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).
40 minutes
onset time of motor blockade in minutes using the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale)
Tidsramme: 40 minutes
the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale): Grade 0: Normal motor function, Grade 1: Decreased motor strength with the ability to move the fingers only, Grade 2: Complete motor block with an inability to move the fingers.
40 minutes

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Postoperativ første analgetikaanmodningstid i timer
Tidsramme: 24 timer
blev taget fra tidspunktet for fuldstændig sensorisk blokering til anmodningen om at redde analgesi, når VAS > 4 cm.
24 timer
Gennemsnitligt blodtryk i mmHg
Tidsramme: 24 timer
blev målt før blokeringen (0 min) og 5, 10, 15, 30 minutter derefter 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 og 24 timer efter blokeringen
24 timer
puls i slag/minut
Tidsramme: 24 timer
blev målt før blokeringen (0 min) og 5, 10, 15, 30 minutter derefter 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 og 24 timer efter blokeringen.
24 timer
perifer iltmætning
Tidsramme: 24 timer
blev målt før blokeringen (0 min) og 5, 10, 15, 30 minutter derefter 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 og 24 timer efter blokeringen.
24 timer
Visual analog scale (VAS): the VAS consisted of a straight, vertical 10-cm line; the bottom point represented "no pain" = (0 cm) and the top "the worst pain you ever have" = (10 cm).
Tidsramme: 24 hours
Patients were asked to rate their pain intensity at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after the block
24 hours
Rescue analgesia in the form of 0.05 mg/kg morphine sulfate intravenously
Tidsramme: 24 hours
was given when VAS ≥ 4 cm
24 hours

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: huda fahmy, ph D, Aswan University

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

15. februar 2019

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

31. august 2020

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

30. september 2020

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

1. december 2020

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

7. december 2020

Først opslået (Faktiske)

14. december 2020

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

16. december 2020

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

12. december 2020

Sidst verificeret

1. december 2020

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 337/2/19

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade

Abonner